SECTION:

ECONOMIC RESEARCH

TITLE:

Empirical Analysis of the Impact of Uncertainty on Consumer Markets in Russian Regions

Gulnara F. Romashkina, Maksim R. Zanchuk

Размер файла 2.828 MB Размер файла Full text

RAR (Research Article Report)

JEL D12, E21, G41

https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2026_22_3_2_380_391

AUTHORS

Gulnara F. Romashkina

Tyumen State University, Tyumen, Russia

E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7764-5566

SPIN-code: 7764-5566

ResearcherID: O-7221-2017

Scopus Author ID: 57219916692

Maksim R. Zanchuk

Tyumen State University, Tyumen, Russia

E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0000-9912-1416

SPIN-code: 9904-4280

FOR CITATION

Romashkina G.F., Zanchuk M.R. Empirical Analysis of the Impact of Uncertainty on Consumer Markets in Russian Regions. Uroven' Zhizni Naseleniya Regionov Rossii=Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2026;22(3):380–391. https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2026_22_3_2_380_391 (In Russ.)

ABSTRACT

The last decade has been characterized by an increasing role of fundamental uncertainty in the Russian economy, related to both external and internal factors. The consumer behaviour across Russian regions, on the one hand, is influenced by standard factors, describing the macroeconomic situation, while on the other hand, it is exposed to panic responses and information asymmetry. The purpose of this article is to conduct a study of the impact of perceived fundamental uncertainty on consumer behavior using the theoretical developments of the Keynesian and post-Keynesian scientific traditions, using data from Russian regions. The empirical analysis is based on regional data from the Russian state statistics for the period from 2000 to 2024. The main method of analysis is a stepwise regression with random effects, where the dependent variable is the average propensity to consume. In the study, various nonlinear models were tested to estimate the possibilities of considering uncertainty. The level of uncertainty was assessed on an information uncertainty index, which was calculated based on the mentions of the term «uncertainty» in newspapers. The rest of the parameters formed a standard set of macroeconomic indicators. The main result of the study was the confirmation of a statistically significant positive connection between news uncertainty and the average propensity to consume. It was concluded that increased uncertainty provokes panic consumption, reflecting an increased propensity to consume while maintaining the significance of standard macroeconomic parameters (GRP per capita, real income and unemployment rate). Possibilities for nonlinear modeling were revealed in describing consumer behavior using the example of Russian regions. There were presented the examples of models that describe the specificity of Russian regions more adequately. Highly significant regional differences were revealed, reflecting the participation of hidden regional factors in the formation of consumer behavior. Thus, the research has confirmed the heuristic possibilities of post-Keynesian theory in describing the dynamics of consumer behavior on empirical data.

KEYWORDS

consumer behavior, propensity, uncertainty, post-Keynesianism, expectations, panel data

INFORMATION ABOUT THE AUTHORS

Gulnara F. Romashkina

Doctor of Sociology, Professor, Tyumen State University.

Maksim R. Zanchuk

Postgraduate Student, Tyumen State University.

REFERENCES

  1. Keynes D. General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. Moscow: Publishing House Eksmo; 2022. 960 p. ISBN 978-5-04-166327-8 (In Russ.)
  2. Lavoie M., Seccareccia M. L'économie Post-Keynésienne, Une pensée Hétérodoxe Méconnue? Revue Interventions Economiques. 2022;67:1–22. https://doi.org/10.4000/interventionseconomiques.16208
  3. Makar S.V., Yarasheva A.V. Consumer Behavior of Russians: Opportunities and Priorities. Narodonaselenie=Population. 2022;25(4):68–78. https://doi.org/10.19181/population.2022.25.4.6 (In Russ.)
  4. Hristov H., Millard J., Pravst I., et al. European Household Spending and Socio-Economic Impacts on Food Behavior During the First Wave of COVID-19. Frontiers in Nutrition. 2022;9:869091. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2022.869091
  5. Pastukhova E.YA., Belchik T.A., Kochneva O.P. Monetary Incomes, Poverty and Consumer Expenditures in the Regions: Long-Term Trends and Impact Factors. Voprosy Upravleniya=Management Issues. 2023;17(3):5–18. https://doi.org/10.22394/2304-3369-2023-3-5-18 (In Russ.)
  6. Shneiderman I.M., Yarasheva A.V., Makar S.V. Financial Behavior of the Russian Population: Regional Differences. Voprosy Statistiki=Bulletin of Statistics. 2021;28(6):59–68. https://doi.org/10.34023/2313-6383-2021-28-6-59-68 (In Russ.)
  7. Gulyugina A.A. Consumer Spending and Purchasing Power of the Russian Population Under Sanctions: Level, Structure, Crisis Manifestations. Uroven' zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii=Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2024;20(4):530–542. https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2024_20_4_4_530_542 (In Russ.)
  8. Manou K., Papapetrou E. Does Uncertainty Matter for Household Consumption? A Mean and a two Tails Approach. Journal of Economics and Finance. 2025;49(4):909–941. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12197-025-09727-9
  9. Dhakal C., Acharya B., Wang S. Food Spending in the United States During the First Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Frontiers in Public Health. 2022;10:1–7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.912922
  10. Zakeri M., Radfar A., Bayati M., et al. Lessons from the Pandemic: An Interrupted Time Series Analysis of Food and Non-Food Household Expenditures in Iran. BMC Public Health. 2025;25(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-25230-6
  11. Drakopoulos S.A. The Marginalization of Absolute and Relative Income Hypotheses of Consumption and the Role of Fiscal Policy. The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought. 2021;28(6):965–984. https://doi.org/10.1080/09672567.2021.1946120
  12. Drakopoulos S.A. Theories of Consumption. MPRA Paper. 2021;108215.
  13. Komarovskaya N.V. Defining Uncertainty. Voprosy Teoreticheskoi Ekonomiki=Issues of Economic Theory. 2025;((1)26):51–64. https://doi.org/10.52342/2587-7666VTE_2025_1_51_64 (In Russ.)
  14. Stiglitz J.E. The Contributions of the Economics of Information to Twentieth Century Economics. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 2000;115(4):1441–1478. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355300555015
  15. Akerlof J., Shiller R. Spiritus Animalis: How Human Psychology Drives the Economy, and Why it Matters for Global Capitalism. Moscow; Publishing House United_Press; 2010. 273 p. ISBN 978-5-904522-33-9 (In Russ.)
  16. Radaev V.V. Emotionally Loaded Consumption in Modern Russia. Part One: Theoretical Basis for Research. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny=Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes. 2023;(5):202–220. https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2023.5.2491 (In Russ.)
  17. Radaev V.V. Emotionally Loaded Consumption in Contemporary Russia: Specific Features, Main Factors and Financial Consequences. Part 2: Empirical Estimates. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny=Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes. 2023;(6):17–34. https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2023.6.2501 (In Russ.)
  18. Drakopoulos S.A. Post-Keynesian Economics: New Foundations by Marc Lavoie. Chapter 2: Theory of Choice. Review of Political Economy. 2023;35(4):1034–1044. https://doi.org/10.1080/09538259.2023.2208064
  19. Lavoie M. A Post Keynesian Approach to Consumer Choice. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics. 1994;16(4):539–562. https://doi.org/10.1080/01603477.1994.11489999