ARTICLE OF THE ISSUE
TITLE
Social Support for Family, Motherhood and Childhood:
Russia and the World Experience
Dzhomart F. Aliev, Evgenii Sh. Gontmakher, Vladimir V. Trubin
 322-338 |
 2.828 MB |
 Full text |
INDEX
RAR (Research Article Report)
https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2024_20_3_1_322_338
AUTHORS
Dzhomart F. Aliev
Russian State Social University, Russia, Moscow
e-mail:
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-0127-9414
РИНЦ Author ID: 1168750
Evgenii Sh. Gontmakher
Russian State Social University, Russia, Moscow
e-mail:
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1060-9111
SPIN-код: 3178-9682
РИНЦ AuthorID: 300275
ResearcherID: J-7690-2015
Scopus Author ID: 56538613900
Vladimir V. Trubin
Russian State Social University, Russia, Moscow
e-mail:
SPIN-код: 7208-2045
РИНЦ AuthorID: 734143
FOR CITATION
Aliev D.F., Gontmakher E.Sh., Trubin V.V. Social Support for Family, Motherhood and Childhood: Russia and the World Experience. Uroven' zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii=Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2024;20(3):322-338. https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2024_20_3_1_322_338 (In Russ.)
ABSTRACT
During 2023, the Russian State Social University conducted research work on the analysis of the system of state support for family,
motherhood and childhood in Russia, as well as in the countries of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD),
in the post-Soviet space, as well as in the BRICS and BRICS+ member states. The purpose of this article is: firstly, a brief summary of
the results obtained and, secondly, the formation of recommendations for improving the Russian practice of state support for the family,
motherhood and childhood. The authors analyzed in detail the legal, financial and organizational principles of policy in the field under study,
separately presenting the unique Russian experience of introducing maternal (family) capital. The analysis made it possible to establish that
state support and protection of the family, motherhood and childhood is implemented through tools that differ in terms of functions, forms and
directions of action. However, the use of these tools within the framework of strategic planning documents is insufficiently comprehensive
and does not have a single goal setting. In this regard, it seems reasonable to combine and implement all existing instruments of state
support for the family, motherhood and childhood within the framework of an independent national project. It is also advisable to study the
issue of the system of practical implementation of this policy in the structure of a special state institution.
KEYWORDS
state support, family, motherhood, childhood, OECD, CIS, BRICS+
AUTHORS BIOGRAFY
Dzhomart F. Aliev – PhD in Economics, DBA, First Vice-Rector of the Russian State Social University
Evgenii Sh. Gontmakher – Doctor of Economics, Professor, Head of the Department of Social Institutions and Social Work of the Russian
State Social University
Vladimir V. Trubin – PhD in Economics, Leading Expert of the Center for Social Research and Technology of the Russian State Social
University
REFERENCES
nal of the New Economic Association. 2015;(2(26)):259-264. (In Russ.)
2. Gontmakher E.Sh. Russian Human Capital: Status and Trends. Mirovaya ehkonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya=World
Eсonomy and International Relations. 2017;61(3):15-24. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2017-61-3-15-24 (In Russ.)
3. Kuzmin A. I. (ed.) Demographic and Family Policy in the Context of Sustainable Development. Vol. 1. IX of the Ural Demographic Forum; June 08-09, 2018; Yekaterinburg, Russia. Collection of scientific papers in 2 vol. Yekaterinburg: Institute of Economics of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences; 2018. 419 p. ISBN 978–5-94646-613-4 (In Russ.)
4. Rybalchenko S.I. (ed.), Korotaev A.V., Efremov I.A., et al. Demographics of 2030. How to Ensure Sustainable Population Growth
in the Russian Federation. Special Report of the Public Chamber of the Russian Federation. Moscow: Pacioli Consulting LLC;
2023. 86 p. ISBN 978-5-6050462-0-2 (In Russ.)
5. Zhbanova Е.А. Social Policy and Development of the Social State. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta im. S.Yu. Vitte. Seriya 2:
Yuridicheskie nauki=Journal of Legal Sciences. 2017;(4(13)):16-22. https://doi.org/10.21777/2587-9472-2017-4-16-22 (In Russ.)
6. Puzin S. N., Grechko A. V., Gontmakher E. SH. Invalidnost' v XXI veke. Mediko-sotsial'naya Reabilitatsiya i Zdorov'esberezhenie
Naseleniya v Rossii. Moscow: BF "EHSKO"; 2023. 416 p. ISBN 978-5-6044242-0-9 (In Russ.)
7. Lemanova P. V. Sotsial'naya Politika v Upravlenii Razvitiem Chelovecheskogo Kapitala. Textbook for students of higher educational institutions. Moscow: Publishing House"Akademiya Estestvoznaniya"; 2016. 228 p. ISBN 978-5-91327-385-7 (In Russ.)
8. Matvienko I.I. Federal Demographic Policy Instruments. Regional'naya ehkonomika i upravlenie: ehlektronnyi nauchnyi
zhurnal=Regional Economy and Management: Electronic Scientific Journal. 2021:(2(66)). https://doi.org/10.24412/1999-2645-
2021-266-25 (In Russ.)
9. Sinelnikov А.B. Demographic Transition and Family-Demographic Policy. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya=Sociological Studies.
2021;(10):83-93. https://doi.org/10.31857/S013216250017168-7 (In Russ.)
10. Shcherbakov А.I. Increasing Fertility is the Main Aim of Demographic Policy of Russia. Sotsial'no-trudovye issledovaniya=Social
and Labor Research. 2019;(3(36)):143-152. https://doi.org/10.34022/2658-3712-2019-36-3-143-152 (In Russ.)
11. Andreeva E.I., Bychkov D.G. Universal Income Support Benefits: International Practices and Outlooks for Russia. Finansovyi
zhurnal=Financial Journal. 2015;(6(28)):24-33. (In Russ.)
338
СТАТЬЯ НОМЕРА
УРОВЕНЬ ЖИЗНИ НАСЕЛЕНИЯ РЕГИОНОВ РОССИИ • 2024 Том 20 №3 • С. 322–338
12. Andryushina E.V., Lutsenko N.O. State Policy on Stimulating the Birth Rate: Its Foreign Practices and Lessons for Modern
Russia. Vlast'. 2020;28(5):235-240. https://doi.org/10.31171/vlast.v28i5.7609 (In Russ.)
13. Zhuravleva L.V. The Analysis of Foreign Practice of Social Support for Families with Children In OECD Countries. Problemy
sovremennoi nauki i obrazovaniya=Problems of Modern Science and Education. 2016;(16(58)):51-55. (In Russ.)
14. Rzhanitsyna L.S. Socioeconomic Assessment of the Effectiveness of Labour Protection management. Uroven' zhizni naseleniya
regionov Rossii=Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2016;12(2):112-129. https://doi.org/10.12737/20770
(In Russ.)
15. Slonimchik F., Yurko A.V. Assessment of The Impact of Maternity Capital Policy in Russia. Demograficheskoe
obozrenie=Demographic Review. 2015;2(3):30-68. https://doi.org/10.17323/demreview.v2i3.1774 (In Russ.)
16. Arkhangelskiy V.N., Zinkina Yu.V., Korotayev A.V., et al. Modern Fertility Trends in Russia and the Impact of the Pro-Natalist
Policies. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya=Sociological Studies. 2017;(3(395)):43-50. (In Russ.)
17. Telyshev V.V. Practice of Applying Special Rules for A Family Enterprise in The System of Low Foreign Countries. Obrazovanie
i pravo=Education and Law. 2020;(6):375-380. https://doi.org/10.24411/2076-1503-2020-10658 (In Russ.)
18. Van Kruiningen L. Fair Taxation and Families. A comparative study with a view to a more equitable income tax. Netherlands:
European Christian Political Foundation. 40 p. URL: https://sallux.eu/Family%20and%20fair%20taxation%20def.pdf (access date:
15.01.2024).
19. Aliev D.F., Gontmakher E.Sh., Trubin V.V. Sotsial'naya Podderzhka Sem'i, Materinstva i Detstva: Rossiya i Mirovoi Opyt. Moscow: Publishing House of RSSU; 2023. 188 p. ISBN 978-5-7139-1484-4 (In Russ.)