SOCIOLOGICAL RESEARCH
TITLE
The Phenomenon of Employment Confidence in the Job Market among
the Working Population of Russia
Aleksandr L. Temnitskii
 425-436 |
 2.828 MB |
 Full text |
INDEX
RAR (Research Article Report)
https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2024_20_3_8_425_436
AUTHOR
Aleksandr L. Temnitskii
Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University), Moscow, Russia
Institute of Sociology – Branch of the Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow,
Russia
e-mail:
ORCID: https://orcid.org/ 0000-0002-5275-7457
SPIN-код: 5717-0857
РИНЦ AuthorID: 74343
ResearcherID: I-4615-2018
Scopus Author ID: 25936831100
FOR CITATION
Temnitskii A.L. The Phenomenon of Employment Confidence in the Job Market among the Working Population of Russia. Uroven' zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii=Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2024;20(3):425–436.
https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2024_20_3_8_425_436 (In Russ.)
ABSTRACT
Based on a secondary analysis of the combined data set obtained through of the Russia Longitudinal Monitoring Survey (RLMS-HSE) of Russians between 1994 and 2022, the article reveals the dynamics and details pertaining to the ratio of fear levels from losing a job and employment confidence in the event of dismissal in the working population of Russia. According to the results of the analysis, the fear of job loss appears to be constructive when combined with employment confidence in the event of dismissal and destructive when this confidence is absent. Applying the concept of the resource-based view, the author of the article studies the role of biological, vocational, educational, territorial, industrial, economic and behavioral groups of workers’ resources in increasing the level of confidence in employment. It was revealed that the possession of these resources is most inherent in young men (under 35 years of age) who have good health and live in megacities or regional centers. Among the production, economic and behavioral resources, employment in private enterprises and the availability of a second job make the greatest contribution to the growth of employment confidence. Other important resources include unreported employment and labor mobility. The results of a regression analysis of the impact of all resource groups on the level of employment confidence showed that, regardless of the high level of qualification among specialists (professionals) or skilled workers, the availability of a second job makes the greatest contribution. In general, the analysis suggests that an increase in employment confidence in the labor market in the event of dismissal is more a consequence of the experience of an additional paid work, a change of a job or a profession, than the emotional and psychological state of the individual, his or her education level and professional status.
KEYWORDS
employment confidence, fear of job loss, job market, resource-based view, professionals, skilled workers, secondary analysis
AUTHORS BIOGRAFY
Aleksandr L. Temnitskii – Doctor of Sociology, Associate Professor, Sociological Department, Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University); Leading Researcher, Institute of Sociology – Branch of the Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences
REFERENCES
1. Kapelyushnikov R.I. Russian Labor Market: a Statistical Portrait on the Crises Background. VoprosyEkonomiki. 2023;(8):5-37.
https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2023-8-5-37 (In Russ.)
2. Standing G. Precariat: a New Dangerous Class. Moscow: Publishing House AD Marginem Press; 2014. 326 p. ISBN 978-5-
91103-209-8 (In Russ.)
3. Toshchenko J.T. (ed.) Precarious Employment: Origins, Criteria, Features. Moscow: Publishing House Ves' Mir; 2021. 400 p.
ISBN 978-5-7777-0852-6 (In Russ.)
4. Bobkov VN. (ed.), Odintsova E.V., Popov A.V. The Impact of Precarization on the Quality of Employment and the Standard of
Living of Generational Groups of Economically Active Population. Sci. Monograph. Izhevsk: Publishing House Shelest; 2023. 104
p. ISBN 978-5-907677-41-8 (In Russ.)
5. Bessokirnaya G.P. Researching Labor Motivation in Post-Reform Russia, 1990-2010.TH Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya=Sociological
Studies. 2017;(1):29-38. (In Russ.)
6. Davydov V.V., Zaporozhets A.V., Lomov B.F., et al. (eds.) Psikhologicheskii slovar'. Moscow: Publishing House Pedagogyka;
1983. 447 p. (In Russ.)
7. Wolpe J. The Practice of Behaviour Therapy. 4th ed. New York: Publishing House Pergamon Press; 1990. 421 p.
8. Gimpel'son V., Kapelyushnikov R., Ratnikova T. Fear of Unemployment and Wage Flexibility in Russia. Ehkonomicheskii zhurnal
vysshei shkoly ehkonomiki=Higher School of Economics Economic Journal. 2003;7(3):341-370. (In Russ.)
9. Giddens E. The Structure of Society: an Essay on the Theory of Structuration. 2nd ed. Moscow: Publishing House Academic
project; 2005. 528 p. (In Russ.)
10. Gimpel'son V.E, Monusova G. A. Fear of Unemployment: Cross-Country Comparisons. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2010;(2):117-138.
https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2010-2-117-138 (In Russ.)
11. Bessokirnaya G.P., Temnitskii A.L. Udovletvorennost' Rabotoi na Predpriyatii i Udovletvorennost' Zhizn'yu. Sotsiologicheskiy
Zhurnal=Sociological Journal. 1999;(1-2):186-191. (In Russ.)
12. Bauman Z. Individualized Society. Moscow: Publishing House Logos; 2002. 390 p. ISBN 5-98704-075-2 (In Russ.)
13. Beck U. Risk Society. On the Way to Another Modernity. Moscow: Publishing House Progress-Tradition; 2000. 384 p. (In Russ.)
14. Mityagina E.V. Resursy Rossiiskii Rabochikh v Usloviyakh Sovremennykh Modernizatsionnykh Protsessov. Nizhny Novgorod:
NISOTS; 2014. 188 p.
15. Gimpel'son V.E, Oshchepkov A.Yu. Uroven' i Strakh Bezrabotitsy: Est' li Mezhdu Nimi Svyaz'? Work Paper WP3.2010.06.
Moscow: State University – Higher School of Economics. 2010:49. (In Russ.)
16.Temnitskii A.L Resource Potential of Precarious Employees in Russia. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya=Sociological Studies.
2022;11:86-99. https://doi.org: 10.31857/S013216250021065-4 (In Russ.)
17. Barsukova S.Yu. Formal and Informal Employment: a Paradoxical Similarity against the Background of the Obvious Difference. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya=Sociological Studies. 2003; 7:3-15. (In Russ.)
18. Tikhonova N.E. Resource approach as a new theoretical paradigm in stratification studies. Ekonomicheskaya
sotsiologiya=Economic sociology. 2007; 7 (3):11-26. (In Russ.)
19. Yadov V.A. Sotsial'nyi Resurs Individov i Grupp Kak Ikh Kapital: Vozmozhnost' Primeneniya Universal'noi Metodologii Issledovaniya Real'nogo Rassloeniya v Rossiiskom Obshchestve. In: Zaslavskaya T.I. (ed.) Kto i kuda stremitsya vesti Rossiyu? Aktory makro-, mezo- i mikrourovnei sovremennogo transformatsionnogo protsessa. Moscow: Publishing House MVShSEN; 2001.
310–318 p. (In Russ.)