CHIEF EDITOR’S COLUMN

TITLE

Chief Editor's column
Vyacheslav N. Bobkov

2.828 MB

Full text

INDEX

EDI (Editorial article)

EDN ILVVTY

AUTHOR

Vyacheslav N. Bobkov

Editor-in-chief of the scientific and practical journal “Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia”, Moscow, Russia

e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

ORCID : https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7364-5297

SPIN-code:  5639-0410

RSCI Author ID:275902

ReseacherID: U-6527-2019

Scopus Author ID:  55960509800

AUTHOR BIOGRAFY

Vyacheslav N. Bobkov

Doctor of Economics, Professor, Honoured Science Worker of the Russian Federation, Chief Research Worker, Head of the Department of Socioeconomic Research of Living Standards and Quality of Live at the Centre of Development of Human Potential at the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences

SECTION:

ECONOMIC RESEARCH

TITLE:

A Conceptual Model of the Interaction between Key Actors in a Programming System for a Prosperous Old Age

Tatiana S. Soloveva, Andrei V. Popov

2.828 MB

Full text

RAR (Research Article Report)

JEL I38, J14

https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2026_22_3_5_423_437

AUTHORS

Tatiana S. Soloveva

Vologda Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Vologda, Russia

E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1770-7566

SPIN-code: 9101-5219

ResearcherID: I-8418-2016

Andrei V. Popov

Vologda Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Vologda, Russia

E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4803-1354

SPIN-code: 7650-7779

ResearcherID: I-8785-2016

FOR CITATION

Soloveva T.S., Popov A.V. A Conceptual Model of the Interaction between Key Actors in a Programming System for a Prosperous Old Age. Uroven' Zhizni Naseleniya Regionov Rossii=Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2026;22(3):423–437. https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2026_22_3_5_423_437 (In Russ.)

ABSTRACT

Demographic aging is a major challenge for many countries, including Russia. It places an increasing demand on healthcare, pension, and social security systems. Additionally, it poses risks of labor shortages. On the other hand, there is a need to effectively utilize the resource potential of older people to solve socio-economic issues. In this context, it is particularly important to shift from fragmented social policies to the formation of an integrated system that brings together the efforts of different stakeholders to ensure the well-being of the elderly. The aim of this paper is to develop a theoretical framework of interaction between key players in promoting the well-being of older people. The study is grounded in applying the welfare state and successful aging concepts. It employs the selection–optimization–compensation model and an ecosystem approach, utilizing methods such as analysis, synthesis, and conceptual modelling. The information base consists of data from a sociological survey of the Vologda Oblast population and an expert survey of key actors in a programming system for a prosperous old age, conducted in 2025. This made it possible to identify the significance of various sources and forms of support provided by different stakeholders, as well as to evaluate the performance and effectiveness of key organizations and actors working with the elderly. The main outcome of the project was the creation of a conceptual model of interaction between various actors in a programming system for a prosperous old age. This included clarifying the principles behind its design and determining the roles played by different actors at different stages of the human life cycle. The practical significance of the study relates to the potential use of the proposed model for developing and implementing measures to improve social policies.

KEYWORDS

demographic aging, well-being, prosperous old age, social policy, programming system for a prosperous old age, actors, interaction, conceptual model

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The reported study was funded by RSF within the scientific project no. 23-78-10128, https://rscf.ru/en/project/23-78-10128/.

INFORMATION ABOUT THE AUTHORS

Tatiana S. Soloveva

PhD in Economics, Senior Researcher, Vologda Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences.

Andrei V. Popov

Doctor of Economics, Lead Researcher, Vologda Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences.

REFERENCES

1. Stoodley I., Conroy S. An Ageing Population: The Benefits and Challenges. Medicine. 2024;52(11):710-712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mpmed.2024.08.013
2. Lee H.-H., Shin K. Decomposing Effects of Population Aging on Economic Growth in OECD Countries. Asian Economic Papers. 2021;20(3):138-159. https://doi.org/10.1162/asep_a_00839
3. Paine N., Rachele J.N., Turrell G. Sociodemographic Characteristics and Social Exclusion Among the Oldest Old. Australasian Journal on Ageing. Australasian Journal on Ageing. 2022;41(4):563-572. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajag.13074
4. Soloveva T.S. The Older Generation in the Russian Labor Market, as Reflected in Official Statistics. Upravlenie ustoichivym razvitiem=Managing Sustainable Development. 2024;(4(53)):61–69. https://doi.org/10.55421/2499992X_2024_4_61 (In Russ.)
5. Vasyuta E.A., Podolskaya T.V., Ushakov D.S. Age-Tech as a Promising Direction for the Silver Economy in the Context of Global Population Ageing. Ekonomika Truda=Russian Journal of Labor Economics. 2022;9(10):1591–1604. https://doi.org/10.18334/et.9.10.116434 (In Russ.)
6. Wang H., Coyte P.C., Shi W., et al. Social Governance and Sustainable Development in Elderly Services: Innovative Models, Strategies, and Stakeholder Perspectives. Sustainability. 2023;15(21):15414. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152115414
7. Galvez-Hernandez P., Shankardass K., Puts M., et al. Mobilizing Community health Assets Through Intersectoral Collaboration for Social Connection: Associations with Social Support and Well-Being in a Nationwide Population-Based Study in Catalonia. PLoS ONE. 2025;20(3). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0320317
8. Yang T., Hagedorn A., Xu W., et al. Multi-Sector Collaboration to Promote Healthy Ageing: A Comparative Case Study of National Policy Responses in the Western Pacific Region. Health Policy. 2026;164:105501. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2025.105501
9. Grigoryeva I.A., Petukhova I.S. Theoretical Approach «Aging-in-Place» and the Possibility of its Popularization in Russia. Uspekhi gerontologii=Advances in Gerontology. 2022;35(5):662–667. https://doi.org/10.34922/AE.2022.35.5.001 (In Russ.)
10. Caristia S., Viola E., Kalemi T. et al. Policies and Strategies on Active and Healthy Ageing: a Scoping Review of the Recommendations of European and International Agencies. Frontiers in Public Health. 2026;13:1712417. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1712417
11. Kjellberg I, Szücs S. Pursuing Collaborative Advantage in Swedish Care for Older People: Stakeholders' Views on Trust. Journal of Integrated Care. 2020;28(3):231–241. https://doi.org/10.1108/JICA-01-2020-0001
12. Poškutė V, Kazlauskaitė R, Matonytė I. Stakeholder Collaboration in Long-Term Care of Older People in Lithuania. Health and Social Care in the Community. 2022;30:193–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.13389
13. Khetagurova A.K., Galiulina O.V., Sidenkova A.P. et al. The Actuality of Inter-Sectoral Interaction in Development of Mechanisms of Healthy Aging. Problemy sotsialnoy gigieny, zdravookhranenia i istorii meditsini=Problems of Social Hygiene, Public Health and History of Medicine. 2018;26(2):68–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0869-866X-2018-26-2-68-71 (In Russ.)
14. Parfenova O.A., Petukhova I.S. The Contradictory Role of the State and the Agency of the Elderly in Extending the Employment of Older Generations: Reconstructing Expert Perceptions. Mir Rossii. Sotsiologiya. Ehtnologiya=Universe of Russia. Sociology. Ethnology. 2024;33(3):51-74. https://doi.org/10.17323/1811-038X-2024-33-3-51-74 (In Russ.)
15. Grigoryeva I., Parfenova O. Socially-Oriented NPOs and Social Enterprises as Drivers of Denationalization in Social Services: Barriers and Opportunities. Zhurnal issledovanii sotsial'noi politiki=The Journal of Social Policy Studies. 2021;19(1):7–22. https://doi.org/10.17323/727-0634-2021-19-1-7-22 (In Russ.)
16. Iarskaia-Smirnova E.R., Bodrova O.A. Models of Legitimation of Non-Profit Organizations as Social Service Providers. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsialnoy antropologii=The Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology. 2021;24(1):45–78. https://doi.org/10.31119/jssa.2021.24.1.3 (In Russ.)
17. Romanenko V., Sulimova A. Attitudes of St. Petersburg Residents Towards the Social Service System. Zhurnal issledovanii sotsial'noi politiki=The Journal of Social Policy Studies. 2023;21(3):433–448. https://doi.org/10.17323/727-0634-2023-21-3-433-448 (In Russ.)
18. Soloveva T.S. Theoretical Foundations for Implementing the Ecosystem Approach to Social Innovation Development at Regional (Local) Level. Ars Administrandi. (Iskusstvo upravleniya)=Ars Administrandi. 2025;17(3):421–446. https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-9173-2025-3-421–446 (In Russ.)
19. Fulmer T., Dash K., Shue J. et al. Age-Friendly Ecosystems: Expert Voices from the Field. Geriatrics. 2023;8(4):8040068. https://doi.org/10.3390/geriatrics8040068
20. Demichev I.V. The Ecosystem of Social Services and the Life of the Family in the Digital Transition Context. Vlast’=The Authority. 2022;30(6):65–70. https://doi.org/10.31171/vlast.v30i6.9346 (In Russ.)
21. Iarskaia-Smirnova E.R., Prisyazhnyuk D.I. Silver Ecosystem of Education for the Benefit of the older Generation. Vestnik Rossiiskogo Universiteta Druzhby Narodov. Seriya: Sotsiologiya=RUDN Journal of Sociology. 2025;25(1):168–181. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2272-2025-25-1-168-181 (In Russ.)
22. Ravchik M.I. Ecosystem of Urban Services: A Study of Priority Needs for Electronic Services among the Older Generation. Uspekhi gerontologii=Advances in Gerontology. 2022;35(4):615-627. (In Russ.)
23. Aleksandrova O.A. Welfare State: Where it Went Yesterday, and What to do Tomorrow. Narodonaselenie=Population. 2022;25(2):6–18. https://doi.org/10.19181/population.2022.25.2.1 (In Russ.)
24. Ohotsky E.V., Bogucharskaya V.A. The Social State and Social Policy of Modern Russia: Orientation to the Result. Trud i sotsial'nye otnosheniya=Labor and Social Relations. 2012;(5(95)):30–44. (In Russ.)
25. Rowe J.W., Kahn R.L. Human Aging: Usual and Successful. Science. 1987;237(4811):143–149. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.3299702
26. Rowe J.W., Kahn R.L. Successful Aging. New York: Random House; 1998. 265 р.
27. Belekhova G.V., Natsun L.N., Soloveva T.S. Prosperous Old Age: From Scientific Theories to the Fundamentals of its Programming. Ehkonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz=Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast. 2024;17(2):220–238. https://doi.org/10.15838/esc.2024.2.92.12
28. Soloveva T.S., Natsun L.N., Shmatova Yu.E., et al. Age Spectrum of Subjective Well-Being: The Specifics of the Elderly. Uspekhi gerontologii=Advances in Gerontology. 2025;38(6):802–809. https://doi.org/10.34922/AE.2025.38.6.001 (In Russ.)
29. Baltes P.B., Baltes M.M. Psychological Perspectives on Successful Aging: The Model of Selective Optimization with Compensation. In: Baltes P.B., Baltes M.M. (Eds.). Successful Aging: Perspectives from the Behavioural Sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1990. P. 1–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511665684
30. Grigoryeva I.A., Kolosova G.V. Social Interactions in Long-Term Care. Uspekhi gerontologii=Advances in Gerontology. 2021;34(6):919–927. https://doi.org/10.34922/AE.2021.34.6.014 (In Russ.)
31. Belekhova G.V., Popov A.V. Age-Related Features of Preparing for old Age: Population Strategies in the Context of Implementation of State Programs for Older Adults. Ehkonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz=Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast. 2025;18(3):203–222. https://doi.org/10.15838/esc.2025.3.99.11 (In Russ.)

SECTION:

SCIENTIFIC LIFE

TITLE:

Review of the Results of the XIX All-Russian Scientific Conference «Kovalevsky Readings»

Rafina R. Zakieva, Tatiana P. Zhidyaeva

2.828 MB

Full text

CNF (Conference Proceedings)

JEL J00

https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2026_22_3_13_529_535

AUTHORS

Rafina R. Zakieva

Kazan State Power Engineering University, Kazan, Russia

E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9513-7672

SPIN-code: 7893-8536

ResearcherID: T-2047-2019

Scopus Author ID: 57205611148

Tatiana P. Zhidyaeva

Chuvash State University named after I.N. Ulyanova, Alatyr, Russia

E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8238-193X

SPIN-code: 5020-0021

ResearcherID: GVT-2580-2022

Scopus Author ID: 58681336300

FOR CITATION

Zakieva R.R., Zhidyaeva T.P. Review of the results of the XIX All-Russian Scientific Conference «Kovalevsky Readings». Uroven' zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii=Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2026;22(3):529–535. https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2026_22_3_13_529_535 (In Russ.)

ABSTRACT

In this review article, the authors review the most notable presentations presented at the All-Russian Scientific Conference as part of the XIX Kovalevsky Readings, held on November 13–15, 2025 at St. Petersburg State University (SPbU). The conference, devoted to topical issues of Russian sociology and related disciplines brought together leading researchers, and early-career researchers from all over the country. Special attention was paid to issues of social stratification, the transformation of family and educational institutions, as well as the impact of digitalization on social processes. The latest trends in the changing structure of Russian society, the dynamics of the standard of living of various social groups and the problems of social inequality were discussed. The panelists stressed the importance of supporting youth initiatives and creating conditions for their successful integration into professional and public life. The focus on interdisciplinary approaches was another distinctive feature of the XIX Kovalev readings. Sociologists actively interacted with representatives of political science, economics, cultural studies and psychology, striving for a more complete and comprehensive understanding of modern social phenomena.

KEYWORDS

foreign sanctions, youth, precarization of labor, special military operation, transformation of Russian society

INFORMATION ABOUT THE AUTHORS

Rafina R. Zakieva

Doctor of Education, Professor of the Department of Industrial Electronics, Kazan State Power Engineering University.

Tatyana P. Zhidyaeva

Senior Lecturer, department of humanities and economics, Alatyr Branch, Chuvash State University named after I.N. Ulyanova.

REFERENCES

1. Sotsiologiya Novoi Sovremennosti: Problemy, Teoriya, Metody. the All-Russian Scientific Conference XIX Kovalevsky Readings Conference Proceedings; Saint Petersburg, Russia; November 13–15, 2025. Ivanovo; Saint Petersburg: PresSto; 2026. 1331 p. ISBN 978-5-6054897-5-7 (In Russ.)
2. Tanatova D.K., Korolev I.V. Russian Family Well-Being in the Self-Assessments of the Population. Uroven' zhizni naseleniya regionovRossii=Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2025;21(1):100–111. https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2025_21_1_7_100_111 (In Russ.)
3. Gorshkov M.K., Tikhonova N.E. (eds.), Andreev A.L., et al. Rossiiskoe Obshchestvo I Vyzovy Vremeni. Book 8. The Institute of Sociology FCTAS RAS. Moscow: Publishing House Ves' Mir; 2025. 352 p. ISBN 978-5-7777-0969-1 (In Russ.)
4. Khazov A.Y. Russian Society in the Face of Modern Challenges. Reflections on the Collective Monograph Edited by M.K. Gorshkov and N.E. Tikhonova «Russian Society and the Challenges of the Time. The Eighth Book». Uroven' zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii=Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2025;21(4):661–669. https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2025_21_4_12_661_669 (In Russ.)
5. Toshchenko Zh.T. Forms of Participation of Higher Education in Solving Problems of Labor Productivity. Vestnik Rossiiskogo Universiteta Druzhby Narodov. Seriya: Sotsiologiya=RUDN Journal of Sociology. 2024;24(1):28–42. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2272-2024-24-1-28-42 (In Russ.)
6. Kozin S.V., Zakieva R.R., Zhidyaeva T.P. The Precariat – the New Oppressed Class of the Twenty-First Century? Filosofiya hozyajstva=Philosophy of the Economy. 2021;(3(134)):199–213. https://doi.org/10.61726/8767.2024.85.98.001 (In Russ.)
7. Toshchenko Zh.T. Transformation of Ideas and Meaning of Labor: from the Cult of Labor to the Cult of Consumption (an Experience of Historical and Sociological Analysis). Part I. Uroven' zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii=Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2025;21(2):274–286. https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2025_21_2_8_274_286 (In Russ.)
8. Chernykh E.A. Quality of Working Life in Russian Regions. Uroven' zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii=Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2025;21(1):28–42. https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2025_21_1_2_28_42 (In Russ.)
9. EfendievA.G., GogolevaA.S. Internalmigration of Workingyouth: Factors of Formation of Readiness to Movetoanothercity. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Sociologiya=Bulletin of St.Petersburg University. Sociology. 2024;17(1):47–64. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu12.2024.104 (In Russ.)
10. Zhidyaeva T.P., Khazov A.Y. Scientific Conference Through the Eyes of the Participants: XV Kovalev Readings. (St. Petersburg, St. Petersburg State University, November 25–27, 2021). Sociologicheskaja nauka i social’naja praktika=Sociological Science and Social Practice. 2022;10(4):171–174. https://doi.org/10.19181/snsp.2022.10.4.9289 (In Russ.)

SECTION:

SCIENTIFIC LIFE

TITLE:

De-Standardization of Employment: Trends and New Contours of Academic Discourse

Vyacheslav N. Bobkov, Olesya V. Veredyuk

2.828 MB

Full text

CNF (Conference Proceedings)

JEL 01

https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2026_22_3_12_516_528

AUTHORS

Vyacheslav N. Bobkov

Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia

E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7364-5297

SPIN-code: 5639-0410

ResearcherID: U-6527-2019

Olesya V. Veredyuk

Saint-Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, Russia

E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9862-633X

SPIN-code: 1559-8191

ResearcherID: K-7044-2013

FOR CITATION

Bobkov V.N., Veredyuk O.V. De-Standardization of Employment: Trends and New Contours of Academic Discourse. Uroven' Zhizni Naseleniya Regionov Rossii=Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2026;22(3):516–528. https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2026_22_3_12_516_528 (In Russ.)

ABSTRACT

This article reviews current academic discourse among labour economists on the destandardization of employment. The study aims to identify the current understanding of domestic economic science regarding trends in the field of employment destandardization. The data for the article are based on the abstracts of speakers at the roundtable discussion «De-Standardization of Employment: Trends and Prospects» at the 10th St. Petersburg International Labour Forum. The uniqueness of this study is determined primarily by the database it utilizes, which is comprised of abstracts — a condensed form of academic discourse — written by academic labour economists from leading Russian research and educational institutions who presented their papers at the country's flagship discussion platform on labour issues. The study revealed the current vision of economic science regarding the trends and new contours of its de-standardization, which in 2026 focuses on the quality of working life, well-being and decent work, the impact of artificial intelligence, the dilemma of «human-centricity versus precarization», new forms of employment (including self-employment), as well as state regulation of the socio-professional structure of the population. An analysis of the reports presented by academic experts at the Labour Forum event over the past five years has shown that their topics sensitively reflect the complex and dynamic development of scientific understanding of employment de-standardization, revealing the close relationship between the external environment and the internal logic of the research process. The reports presented at this event, which has become one of the flagship events of the Labour Forum program, provide an opportunity to summarize trends and explore new contours of the phenomenon of employment de-standardization in Russia.

KEYWORDS

employment, employment de-standardisation, employment quality, precarious employment, St. Petersburg International Labour Forum, economic theory, labour economics

INFORMATION ABOUT THE AUTHORS

Vyacheslav N. Bobkov

Doctor of Economics, Professor, Honoured Science Worker of the Russian Federation, Chief Research Worker, Head of the Department of Socioeconomic Research of Living Standards and Quality of Live at the Centre of Development of Human Potential at the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences.

Olesya V. Veredyuk

PhD in Economics, Associate Professor, Saint-Petersburg State University.

REFERENCES

1. Bobkov V.N. Klassifikaciya Sovremennoj Zanyatosti, Osobennosti i Tendencii Razvitiya Eyo Nestandartnyh Form v Rossijskoj Federacii. In: Lyutov N.L., Chernyh N.V. (eds.) Trudovye Otnosheniya v Usloviyah Razvitiya Nestandartnyh Form Zanyatosti. Monograph. Moscow: Prospekt; 2022. P. 8-28. ISBN 978-5-392-36600-2 (In Russ.)
2. Bobkov V.N. On the Concept of the Problems of Modern Labour Economics. Uroven' zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii=Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2025;21(3):355-370. https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2025_21_3_1_355_370 (In Russ.)
3. Bobkov V.N., Odintsova E.V., Ivanova T.V., Chashchina T.V. Significant Indicators of Precarious Employment and Their Priority. Uroven' zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii=Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2022;18(4):502–520. https://doi.org/10.19181/lsprr.2022.18.4.7 (In Russ.)
4. Bobkov V.N., Odintsova E.V., Podvoisky G.L. Sustainable and Precarious Employment in the Russian Federation. Mir novoi ehkonomiki=The World of the New Economy. 2023;17(3):109-124. https://doi.org/10.26794/2220-6469-2023-17-3-109-124 (In Russ.)
5. Smirnykh L.I. Artificial Intelligence in Russian Enterprises: What are the Effects on Employment? Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2025;(9):88-102. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2025-9-88-102 (In Russ.)
6. Skorobogatov A.S., Sviridov O.I. The Artificial Intelligence Impact on Russian Labor Market. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2025;(1):71-91. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2025-1-71-91 (In Russ.)
7. Dong Z., Abd Aziz M.F., Wang Y. An Empirical Analysis of How Artificial Intelligence Development Influences the Adjustment of Human Capital Structure in Businesses. Finance Research Letters. 2025;84:107827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2025.107827
8. Li Z., Yang H., Zhang T. Impact of Enterprise Artificial Intelligence Development on Human Capital Structure. Finance Research Letters. 2025;82:107600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2025.107600
9. Hatzius J., Briggs J., Kodnani D., et al. The Potentially Large Effects of Artificial Intelligence on Economic Growth. New York: Goldman Sachs; 2023. P. 268-296.
10. Hardy W., Keister R., Lewandowski P. Educational Upgrading, Structural Change and the Task Composition of Jobs in Europe. Economics of Transition. 2018:26(2):201–231. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecot.12145
11. Zubkov V.I. Influence of Modern Socio-economic Tendencies on the Development of Non-standard Forms of Employment. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 18: Sotsiologiya i politologiya=Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 18. Sociology and Political Science. 2020;26(2):156-177. https://doi.org/10.24290/1029-3736-2020-26-2-156-177 (In Russ.)
12. Terranova T. Free Labor: Producing Culture for the Digital Economy. Social Text. 2000;18(2):33–58. https://doi.org/10.1215/01642472-18-2_63-33
13. Goods C., Veen A., Barratt T. Is Your Gig Any Good? Analysing Job Quality in the Australian Platform-Based Food-Delivery Sector. Journal of Industrial Relations. 2019;61(4):1–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022185618817069
14. Radaev V.V. The Expansion of Platforms as a Challenge to Sociology. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniia =Sociological Studies. 2022;(12):15–28. https://doi.org/10.31857/S013216250022667-6 (In Russ.)
15. Shevchuk A.V. From Factory to Platform: Autonomy and Control in the Digital Economy. Sotsiologiya vlasti =Sociology of Power. 2020;32(1):30-54. https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2020-1-30-54 (In Russ.)
16. Kalleberg A.L. Precarious Work, Insecure Workers: Employment Relations in Transition. American Sociological Review. 2009;74(1):1–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240907400101
17. Ovcharova L.N., Sinyavskaya O.V., Biryukova S.S., Gorina E.A., Nagernyak M.A., Pishnyak A.I. Social protection in Russia: Choices of the future. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2022;(8):5-31. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2022-8-5-31 (In Russ.)
18. Burchell B., Sehnbruch K., Piasna A., Agloni N. The Quality of Employment and Decent Work: Definitions, Methodologies, and Ongoing Debates. Cambridge Journal of Economics. 2014;38(2):459-477. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bet067
19. Nunes P.M., Proença T., Carozzo-Todaro M.E. A Systematic Review on Well-Being and Ill-Being in Working Contexts: Contributions of Self-Determination Theory. Personnel Review. 2024;53(2):375-419. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-11-2021-0812
20. Stephens T.C. What has Happened to Job Quality in Britain? The Effect of Different Weighting Methods on Labour Market Inequalities and Changes Using a UK Quality of Work (QoW) Index, 2012-2021. Social Indicators Research. 2025;177(2):833-861. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-025-03542-9
21. Bobkov V.N., Gulyugina A.A. (ex. eds.), Odintsova E.V., et al. Monitoring of Incomes and Living Standards of The Russian Population – 2024. Yearbook. Issue 3(204). Moscow: IE RAS; 2025. 170 p. ISBN 978-5-9940-0792-1 (In Russ.)
22. Odintsova E.V. Assessment of Precarious Employment in the Russian Formal Sector: from the Level of Workers to the Level of Households. Obshchestvo i ehkonomika=Society and Economics. 2025;(8):18-32. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0207367625080022 (In Russ.)
23. Bobkov V.N., Veredyuk O.V. Employment and Labour Market: Contours of De-Standardisation. Academic Discussion at the V St. Petersburg International Labour Forum (St. Petersburg, 23 April 2021). Uroven' zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii=Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2021;17(2):271–285. https://doi.org/10.19181/lsprr.2021.17.2.11 (In Russ.)
24. Veredyuk O.V. De-Standardisation of Employment: from Practice to Theory and Vice Versa. Results of the Round Table at the IX St. Petersburg International Labor Forum. Uroven' zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii=Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2025;21(3):480–490. https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2025_21_3_11_480_490 (In Russ.)
25. Gimpel'son V., Kapeljushnikov R. Nestandartnaja Zanjatost' i Rossijskij Rynok Truda. Preprint WP3/2005/05. Moscow: HSE University; 2005. 36 p. (In Russ.)
26. Standing G. The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class. London: Bloomsbury Academic; 2011. 209 p. ISBN 978-1-84966-352-6
27. Belov A., Zolotov A. Economic Aspects of University Activities in Japan. Voprosy Obrazovaniya=Educational Studies. 2014;(3):30-53. https://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2014-3-30-53
28. Shabunova A.A., Popov A.V. Bol'she, Chem NPD. Sotsial'no-ehkonomicheskie Kontury Samozanyatosti. Zhurnal Byudzhet. 2026;(3(279)):73-77. (In Russ.)
29. Morozova N.G., Tipalina M.V. Modern Problems and Prospects of Tax on Professional Income Application. Vestnik Universiteta. 2023;(6):162-170. https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2023-6-162-170 (In Russ.)