PHILOSOPHICAL RESEARCH

TITLE

Is Divorce a Window to Freedom?

Olesya N. Zhupnik

Размер файла291−299
Размер файла  2.81 MB Размер файла Full text

INDEX

RAR (Research Article Report)

https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2024_20_2_12_291_299

EDN YBAHII

AUTHOR

Olesya N. Zhupnik

V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University, Simferopol, Russia

e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000–0002–0936–2839

SPIN-code: 9421-3866

РИНЦ AuthorID: 1217387

FOR CITATION

Zhupnik O.N Is Divorce a Window to Freedom? Uroven' zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii=Living Standards of the Population in the 
Regions of Russia. 2024;20(2):291–299.https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2024_20_2_12_291_299 (In Russ.)

ABSTRACT

The article offers a socio-philosophical analysis of the phenomenon of divorce, as the severance of the closest relationships that exist in society – the relationship between husband and wife, between parents and children. An attempt is made to critically comprehend modern social positions in relation to marriage as “limiting bonds of freedom”, and to divorce as a “window to freedom”, to study the motives for divorce and to search for ways to overcome the dissolution of marriage. This study was carried out based on a combination of sociophilosophical analysis and an interdisciplinary approach in compliance with the principles of systematicity, development and interconnection of the phenomena of reality. Comparative-historical, comparative-contrastive and structural-functional analysis is used. Based on the data of the author's regional study in Crimea, the motives for divorce are investigated, among which they stand out. problems of an ideological and personal nature, disagreement in ideas about family roles, the unpreparedness of one of the spouses for the birth of a child, family and everyday problems, housing issues. J. Levinger's model of strengthening marriage is being adapted to modern conditions, which consists of increasing the attractiveness of marriage; reducing the attractiveness of alternative relationships (“civil marriage”); increasing number of obstacles on the path to divorce. The findings of the study also indicate that the upward trend in divorce rates and the downward trend in marriages represent a kind of “scissors” that curtail the institution of the family.

KEYWORDS

family institution, marriage, family, divorce, family values, social philosophy, young family, value orientations

AUTHOR'S BIOGRAFY

Olesya N. Zhupnik

PhD in Philosophy, Leading Specialist in Educational and Methodological Work of the Department of Philosophy, V.I. 
Vernadsky Crimean Federal University

REFERENCES

1. Chesterton G.K. The Superstition of Divorce. Moscow: Publishing House Artos: Nizhnii Novgorod: Khristianskaya b-ka; 2017. 
144 p. ISBN 978-5-905472-55-8 (In Russ.)
2. Sorokin P. Sovremennoe sostoyanie Rossii. Praga; 1992. Available from: https://pitirim.org/index.php/publications-pitirimsorokin/from-pitirm-sorokin/161-current-state-of-russia (access date: 11.03.2024) (In Russ.)
3. Dzhumabaeva Sh.Kh. Demographic Potential of the Republic of Karakalpakstan. Narodonaselenie=Population. 2020;23(3):
145-154. https://doi.org/10.19181/population.2020.23.3.13 (In Russ.)
4. Kharkonen Yu., Billingslei S., Khornung M. Divorce Trends in Seven Countries Over the Long Transition from State Socialism: 1981–2004. Transl. and intro by V. Solodnikov. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ehkonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny=Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes Journal. 2023;(2):127–159. https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2023.2.2295 (In Russ.)
5. Churilova E.V., Zakharov S.V. Partnership Quality, Union Dissolution Intensions and their Realization Among Men and 
Women in Russia. Zhenshchina v rossiiskom obshchestve=Woman in Russian Society. 2022;(3):131-142. https://doi.org/10.21064/
WinRS.2022.3.9 (In Russ.)
6. Tikhomirova E.V., Samokhvalova A.G., Khazova S.A., et al. Women’s Experience of Divorce // Acta Biomedica Scientifica.
2022;7(3):216-228. https://doi.org/10.29413/ABS.2022-7.3.22 (In Russ.) 
7. Sinelnikov A.B. Social Acceptability of Objective and Subjective Reasons for Divorce in Modern Russia. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya=Sociological Studies. 2023;(4):75-83. https://doi.org/10.31857/S013216250022703-6 (In Russ.)
8. Gurko T. A. Dynamics of Indicators of Development and Well-Being of Adolescents in Various Types of Families // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya=Sociological Studies. 2022;(10):107-116. https://doi.org/ 10.31857/S013216250021397-9 (In Russ.)
9. Kuchmaeva O.V., Maryganova E.A., Petryakova O.L., et al. Family's Educational Potentialities. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya=Sociological Studies. 2010;(7(315)):49-55 (In Russ.)
10. Churilova E.V., Zakharov S.V. Trends in Dissolution of First Partnerships in Russia. Voprosy statistiki. 2021;28(2):54-66. https://doi.org/10.34023/2313-6383-2021-28-2-54-66 (In Russ.)
11. Kharchev A.G. Brak i sem'ya v SSSR. Moscow: Mysl'; 1979. 367 p. (In Russ.)
12. Kokh M.N., Sysoeva L.V. Family in the Value Orientation Structure of a Modern Student. Azimut nauchnyh issledovanij: pedagogika i psihologiya=Azimuth of Scientific Research: Pedagogy and Psychology. 2021;10(3(36)):155-158. https://doi.org/10.26140/anip-2021-1003-0038 (In Russ.)
13. Zupnik O.N. Specificity and Problems of Modern Student Family. Practical Pilosophy: State and Prospects Conference Proceedings; 2022; Simferopol, Russia. Simferopol: ARIAL. 2022:120-125. (In Russ.) 
14. Zhupnik O.N. Young Family: Typical Problems and Prospects for Strengthening It (socio-philosophical analysis). Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta=Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University. 2023;(10(480)):71-80. https://doi.
org/10.47475/1994-2796-2023-480-10-70-78 (In Russ.)
15. Sinelnikov A.B. Divorce – a Revolution in the Family. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 18. Sotsiologiya i politologiya=Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 18. Sociology and Political Science. 2010;(2):130-146. (In Russ.) 
16. Sampson J. Robert. Crime in Cities: The Effects of Formal and Informal Social Control. Crime and Justice. 1986;8:271–311. 
17. Doherty J. William, Needle R. H. Psychological Adjustment and Substance Use Among Adolescents Before and After a Parental Divorce. Child Development. 1991;62:328-337. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1991.tb01534.x
18. Fagan P., Rector R. The effects of divorce on Аmerica. Report. The Heritage Foundation. Washington; 2000 June 5. 56 p. 
19. Volkov A.G. Sem'ya – ob"ekt demografii. Moscow: Publishing House Mysl'; 1986. 271 p. (In Russ.)
20. Mannich E. Nove vyvojove trendy v vybrannych rodinnych znaku v Dansku. In: Sborník prací filozofické fakulty Brněnské univerzity Studia minora facultatis philosophicae universitatis brunensis.1986;30:55-66. 
21. Sinel'nikov A.B. Problema prochnosti mnogodetnykh semei (rezul'taty Vserossiiskogo issledovaniya mnogodetnykh materei). In: Antonov A.I. (ex. ed.) Familisticheskie issledovaniya. Vol. 2. Million mnenii o sem'e i o sebe. Moscow; 2009. P. 339–350. ISBN 978-5-98227-646-9, 978-5-98227-648-3 (In Russ.)
22. Sinelnikov A.B. Divorce for Subjective Reasons: the Survey Data. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 18. Sotsiologiya i politologiya=Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 18. Sociology and Political Science. 2017;23(3):116-132. (In Russ.) 
23. Levinger G. A social psychological perspective on marital dissolution. Journal of Social Issues. 1976;32(1):21–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1976.tb02478.x 

The article was submitted 24.03.2024; approved after reviewing 22.04.2024; accepted for publication 09.06.2024.

PHILOSOPHICAL RESEARCH

TITLE

A Collective Socio-Historical Memory: Background for Complete Philosophical Theory Developing

Andrey V. Dakhin

Размер файла105-119  Размер файла  2.34 MB Размер файла Full text

INDEX

RAR (Research Article Report)

https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2024_20_1_9_105_118

EDN DMDVCK

AUTHOR

Andrey V. Dakhin

Nizhny Novgorod Institute of Management – Branch of RANEPA under the President of the Russian Federation, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia

е-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5907-706X

SPIN-code:  2857-0283

РИНЦ Author ID: 250322

ResearcherID: E-7714-2019

Scopus Author ID: 57195759852

FOR CITATION

Dakhin A.V. A Collective Socio-Historical Memory: Background for Complete Philosophical Theory Developing. Uroven' zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii=Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2024;20(1):105–118. https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2024_20_1_9_105_118 (In Russ.)

ABSTRACT

Giving attention to the strangeness of differences between a regular western memory studies concepts and priority values of Russia memo-politics the author analyzed troubles of developing Russia complete philosophy of memory at the beginning of the 21 century. The case of troubles is discovering by describing of contradictions between theory of memory and memory policy, by secondary status of Russia memory studies regarding to the West memory studies, and also by the case of dividing of collective memory structure of domestic philosophical culture on “before”, “under” and “after” the historical materialism. The research shows come backgrounds which, on the one hand, call to critical analysis of western memory studies concepts for overcoming its deontological episteme and, on the other hand, it calls to critical analysis of the soviet “historical cognition” concept for overcoming its materialistic episteme about a social being. Theoretic and methodological sources for solving this tasks, as the author thought, are related with theories by L.S. Vygisky, A.F. Losev, E.V. Il’enkov, G.P. Shchedrivitcky, L.A. Zelenov, V.A. Kutyrev and others. Results of this studies presents some conceptual characteristics of the complete philosophical theory of collective memory, among them are, on the first. background of an ontological nuclear which discovers complete system of fundamental relations of a man/ society with its own history; on the second, inside of this ontological system must be separated the social memory as a special collective mechanism of relations with past history; on the third, to discover dialectics between collective and individual memory and commemoration; on the forth, o discover dialectics between everyday memory and historical memory; on the fifth, o discover dialectics between oblivion and memory in the structure of social revolutions and reforms.

 

KEYWORDS

collective socio-historical memory, complete philosophy of memory, memory studies, historical cognition, social ontology, deontological approach, cultural memory

AUTHORS BIOGRAFY

Andrey V. Dakhin

Doctor of Philosophy, Professor, Professor of Department of Philosophy, Sociology and Psychology of Management, Nizhny Novgorod Institute of Management – Branch of RANEPA under the President of the Russian Federation

 

 

REFERENCES

  1. Hutton P. History as an art of memory. Transl. from Eng. by Bystrov U.V. St. Petersburg: Publishing house “Vladimir Dal”; 2003. 423 p. ISBN 5-93615-026-7 (In Russ.)
  2. Repina L.P. (ed.) Istoriya i pamyat'. Istoricheskaya kul'tura Evropy do nachala Novogo vremeni. Moscow: Publishing house “Krug”; 2006. 768 p. ISBN 5-7396-0099-5 (In Russ.)
  3. Halbwachs M. Social frameworks of memory. Moscow: Novoe izdatel’stvo; 2007. 348 p. ISBN 978-5-98379-088-9 (In Russ.)
  4. Ricoeur P. History, memory, oblivion. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo gumanitarnaia literature; 2004. 728 p. ISBN 5-87121-031-7 (In Russ.)
  5. Le Goff J. History and memory. Moscow: ROSSPEN; 2013. 303 p. ISBN 978-5-8243-1774-9 (In Russ.)
  6. Assman A. The long shadow of memory. Memorial culture and historical policy. Transl. from Germ. . by Khlebnicov B. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie; 2014. 323 p. ISBN 978-5-4448-0146-8 (In Russ.)
  7. Assman Y. Cultural memory and early civilization: Writing, remembrance and political imagination. Transl. from Germ. Sokol’skaia М. М. Moscow: Yazyki slavianskoi kul’tury; 2004. 368 p. ISBN 5-94457-176-4 (In Russ.)
  8. Langenohl A. Memory in Post-Authoritarian Societies. In: Erll A., Nünning A. (eds.). Cultural Memory Studies: An International and Interdisciplinary Handbook. Berlin: New York: De Gruyter; 2010. p. 163-172. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110207262.3.163
  9. Miller A.I.. Memory control: Historical policy in post-communist Europe. Russia in global affairs. 2016;(3).
  10. Wijermars M. Memory Politics in Contemporary Russia: Television, Cinema and the State. Studies in Contemporary Russia. University of Helsinki: Routledge, Taylor & Francis, Abingdon; 2018. 258 p. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351007207
  11. Domańska M., Rogoża J. Forward, into the past! Russia’s politics of memory in the service of ‘eternal’ authoritarianism. OSW Report. No 11. Warsaw: Centre for Eastern Studies; 2021. 110 p. ISBN 978-83-67159-00-5
  12. Hartog F. What is the Role of the Historian in an Increasingly Presentist World? In: Harlaftis G., Karapidakis N., Sbonias K., Vaiopoulos V. (eds.) The New Ways of History: Developments in Historiography. New York: Tauris Academic Studies; 2010. P. 239-252. ISBN 978-1-84885-126-9
  13. Klein K.L. On the Emergence of Memory in Historical Discourse. 2000;(69):127-150. https://doi.org/10.2307/2902903
  14. Anikin D.A. Topologiya kollektivnoi pamyati: ot sotsial'nykh riskov k tsivilizatsionnym vyzovam. Saratov: IC «Nauka»; 2016. 163 p. ISBN 978-5-9999-2729-3 (In Russ.)
  15. Vasiliev A.G. Memory studies: edinstvo paradigmy - mnogoobrazie ob"ektov. Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. 2012;(5(117)):461-480. (In Russ.)
  16. Dakhin A.V. Memory, history and the Universe: Towards the New Ontology of Reality. Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N.I. Lobachevskogo=Vestnik of Lobachevsky University of Nizhni Novgorod. 2012;(1-3):19-34. (In Russ.)
  17. Loiko O.T. Fenomen sotsial'noi pamyati. Tomsk: Tomsk State University; 2002. 255 p. ISBN 5-751-1540-2 (In Russ.)
  18. Makarov A.I. Fenomen nadyndividual'noi pamyati (obrazy – kontsepty – refleksiya). Volgograd: Volgograd state university; 2009. 215 p. ISBN 978-5-9669-0658-0 (In Russ.)
  19. Khoruzhii S.S. Posle pereryva. Puti russkoi filosofii. St. Petersburg: Aleteiya; 1994. 447 p. ISBN 5-86050-067-X (In Russ.)
  20. Dakhin A.V. Narody SSSR i narod Rossiiskoi federatsii: teoriya i praktika opredeleniya gosudarstvoobrazuyushchego soobshchestva. In: Istoriya i politika: Natsional'nyi vopros i natsional'naya ideya v mnogonatsional'nom gosudarstve: problemy, resheniya, opyt, perspektivy. Coll. of Sci. Art. Nizhny Novgorod: Nizhny Novgorod Institute of Management – Branch of RANEPA, 2023. P. 151-159. (In Russ.)
  21. Zhizhek S. A ticklish subject: a missing center of political ontology. Transl. from Engl. by Shchukina L. Moscow: Publishing House Delo; 2014. 528 p. ISBN 978-5-7749-0823-3 (In Russ.)
  22. Luman N. Obshchestvo obshchestva. In 5-th books. Book 1. Obshchestvo kak sotsial'naya sistema. Moscow.: Logos; P. 15-201. ISBN 978-5-8163-0091-9 (In Russ.)
  23. Rakitov A.I. Istoricheskoe poznanie: Sistemno-gnoseologicheskii podkhod. Moscow: Politizdat; 303 p. (In Russ.)
  24. Marks K., Engels F. Collection of works. 2nd Vol. 4. Ideology of Germany. The criticism of the modern German philosophy represented by Feuerbach, B, Bauer and Stirner and German socialism represented by different prophets. Moscow: Partiinoe izdatel’stvo; 1933. P. 2-584. (In Russ.)
  25. Lenin V.I. Complete collection of works. 5th Vol. 18. Materialism and empiriocriticism. Critical notes about a single reactionary philosophy. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo poloticheskoi literatury; 1968. P. 7-384. (In Rus.)
  26. Omel'yanovskii M.Eh. Razvitie osnovanii fiziki KHKH veka i dialektika. Moscow: Nauka; 312 p. (In Russ.)
  27. Mamardashvili M.K. Kak ya ponimayu filosofiyu. Moscow: Publishing House «Progress»: «Kul’tyra»; 1992. 414 p. (In Russ.)
  28. Vygotskii L.S. Sobranie sochinenii. In 6-th volumes. Vol. 1. Soznanie kak problema psikhologii povedeniya. Moscow: Pedagogica; 1984. P. 78-98. (In Russ.)
  29. Losev A.F. Filosofiya imeni. Moscow: Lomonosov Moscow State University; 1990. 269 P. ISBN 5-211-01092-2 (In Russ.)
  30. Il'enkov EH.V. Dialekticheskaya logika. Moscow: Politizdat; 1984. 320 P. (In Russ.)
  31. Shchedrovitskii G.P. Filosofiya. Nauka. Moscow: Shkola kul’turnoi politiki. 1997. 656 p. ISBN 5-86969-002-7 (In Russ.)
  32. Zelenov L.A. Vvedenie v obshchuyu metodologiyu. Nizhny Novgorod: Publishing House Gladkova; 2002. 155 p. ISBN 5-93530-042-7(In Russ.)
  33. Kutyrev V.A. Poslednee tselovanie. Chelovek kak traditsiya. Petersburg: Aleteiya; 2015. 312 p. ISBN 978-5-9905768-9-6 (In Russ.)

 

The article was submitted 31.12.2023; approved after reviewing 18.02.2024; accepted for publication 21.03.2024

PHILOSOPHICAL RESEARCH

TITLE

On the Philosophy of State, Sovereign Thinking and the Biologism of Society

Victor I. Shamshurin, Nina G. Shamshurina

Размер файла630-640  Размер файла  396.51 KB Размер файла Full text

INDEX

RAR (Research Article Report)

https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2023_19_4_12_630_640

EDN CYWCRK

AUTHORS

Viktor I. Shamshurin

Moscow State Lomonosov University, Moscow, Russia

e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1099-346X

Nina G. Shamshurina

Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Russian Medical Academy of Continuing Professional Education, Moscow, Russia

e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6015-4787

FOR CITATION

Shamshurin VI, Shamshurina NG. On the Philosophy of State, Sovereign Thinking and the Biologism of Society. Uroven' zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii=Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2023;19(4):630–640. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2023_19_4_12_630_640

ABSTRACT

Philosophical understanding of state, sovereign thinking as the basis of public opinion is aimed at substantiating the idea of sovereignty (self-dominance as self-identity) of the individual, society and state in accordance with cultural, historical, civilizational and religious traditions of succession, with the goal of establishing one’s own author’s position, developed on the basis of universalism, consistency and integrity as objectivity, insuring against risks and errors. Sometimes in a number of studies, the emphasis is placed on the biological, bodily-economic component, and sometimes on the psychological (even psychopathic), or more precisely, psycho-somatic. This article also highlights the equally important spiritual, philosophical and religious aspect of the topic. At the same time, the following very important point is clarified: when they speak specifically about the cultural-civilizational aspect, then this, in fact, is rather a clarification of one of the three above-mentioned aspects, as certain representative databases in the form of sociological or historical samples. When defining the subject of research, talking only about the ontological as biological, only the physiological and even economic dimension of the political world and the processes occurring in it means missing the opportunity to consider this subject in the greatest number of options. The very assessment and qualification of anything as just a “biological”, or natural, or materialistic (dialectical-materialistic), or economic principle, due to its reflexivity, is not purely biological, etc., but also simultaneously, and the methodological, epistemological, cognitive stage. Any, no matter how specific, empirical fact in the legal, socio-political field is a set of abstract judgments, which, nevertheless, require philosophical and strategic tracing of the connection with the mechanism of its implementation in real society.

KEYWORDS

eschatology, soteriology, personality, society, state, culture, civilization

AUTHORS BIOGRAFY

Viktor I. Shamshurin

Doctor of Sociological Sciences, Professor in the Department of Philosophy of Politics and Law, the Faculty of Philosophy, the Moscow State University of M.V. Lomonosov, Moscow, Russia

Nina G. Shamshurina

Doctor of Economical Sciences, Professor in the Department of Medicine Sociology, Economics of Healthcare and Health Insurance, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University; Russian Medical Academy of Continuing Professional Education, Moscow, Russia

REFERENCES

  1. Esposito R., Hanafi Z. Community, immunity, biopolitics. Angelaki. 2013;18(3):83-90. https://doi.org/10.1080/096972 5x.2013.834666
  2. Alasaniya K.Yu. Biopolitika ot Spensera do Ehspozito: klyuchevye kontseptsii i podkhody. Moscow: Publisher A.V. Vorobyov; 2023. 316 p. (In Russ.) ISBN 978-5-93883-499-6
  3. Alasania K.Yu. Alasaniya K.YU. Biopolitika: klyuchevye napravleniya kontseptualizatsii v sovremennoi politicheskoi nauke. Filosofiya politiki i prava. 2023;(14):9-19. (In Russ.)
  4. Alasaniya K.Yu. «Identichnost'» kak ponyatie biopolitiki v ehpokhu globalizma. Filosofiya politiki i prava. 2022;(13):52-62. (In Russ.)
  5. Kakim mir budet posle pandemii: prognozy sovremennykh filosofov // snob.ru: [site]. 17.04.2020. URL: https://snob.ru/entry/191734/ (access date: 06.20.2023). (In Russ.)
  6. Soloviev V.S. Sochineniya v 2 tomakh. Vol. 2. Moscow: Mysl; 1990. 824 p. (In Russ.) ISBN 5-244-00192-2
  7. Frank S.L. Sochineniya. Moscow: Pravda; 1990. 607 p. (In Russ.)
  8. Lossky N.O. Tsennost' i bytie. Moscow: AST; 2000. 864 p. (In Russ.) ISBN 966-03-0722-5
  9. Lossky V.N. Ocherk misticheskogo bogosloviya Vostochnoi Tserkvi. Dogmaticheskoe bogoslovie. Moscow: SEI Center; 1991. 288 p. (In Russ.)
  10. Skvortsov K.I. Filosofiya Ottsov i Uchitelei Tserkvi. Moscow: Society of Lovers of Orthodox Literature; 2007. 472 p. (In Russ.) ISBN 485-779-2
  11. Berdyaev N.A. Opyt ehskhatologicheskoi metafiziki (Tvorchestvo i ob"ektivatsiya). Paris: YMCA-RESS; 1947. 219 p. (In Russ.)
  12. Vernadskiy V.I. Filosofskie mysli naturalista. Moscow: Nauka; 1988. 520 p. (In Russ.) ISBN 5-02-003325-1
  13. Vernadskiy G.V. Nachertanie russkoi istorii. Moscow: Airis press; 2004. 368 p. (In Russ.) ISBN 5-8112-0019-6
  14. Optinskie startsy: nastavleniya, pis'ma, dnevniki. Moscow: Lepta kniga; 2011. 816 p. (In Russ.) ISBN 978-5-91173-282-0
  15. Tikchomirov L.A. Khristianstvo i politika. Moscow; Kaluga: Alir; 2002. 616 p. (In Russ.) ISBN 5-89653-012-9
  16. Lebon G. Psikhologiya narodov i mass. Moscow; 2023. 288 p. (In Russ.)
  17. Khomyakov A. S. Po povodu stat’i I. V. Kireevskogo “O kharaktere prosveshcheniya Evropy i ego otnoshenii k prosveshcheniyu Rossii”. In: Khomyakov A. S. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii v 2 t. Moscow: Universitetskaya tipografiya; 1861. Р. 195–260. (In Russ.)
  18. Slovo Daniila Zatochnika, napisannoe im svoemu knyazyu Yaroslavu Vladimirovichu. In: Literatura Drevnei Rusi. Moscow: AST; 2021. Р. 67–75. (In Russ.)
  19. Slovo o polku Igoreve. In: Literatura Drevnei Rusi. Moscow: AST; 2021. Р. 3–55. (In Russ.)
  20. Danilevskii N.Ya. Rossiya i Evropa. Moscow: De libri; 2016. 768 p. (In Russ.) ISBN 978-5-386-07994-9

The article was submitted 16.08.2023; approved after reviewing 14.10.2023; accepted for publication 01.12.2023.

PHILOSOPHICAL RESEARCH

Life as a Vital Activity: the Relationship between the Quality of the Population and the Quality of Its Life (Part II)

Nikolai S. Malikov, Ivan F. Malikov

Размер файла444-451  Размер файла  430.22 KB Размер файла Full text

INDEX

RAR (Research Article Report)1

DOI: 10.52180/1999-9836_2023_19_3_11_444_451

EDN: WZOHLN

AUTHORS

Nikolai S. Malikov

Moscow, Russia

Ivan F. Malikov

Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia

e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

 

FOR CITATION

Malikov N.S., Malikov I.F. Life as a Vital Activity: the Relationship between the Quality of the Population and the Quality of Its Life (Part II). Uroven' zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii=Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2023;19(3):444–451. (In Russ.) DOI https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2023_19_3_11_444_451

ABSTRACT

In the second part of this article, the relationship between the quality of population and the quality of its life is considered in the aspect of life activity in the unity of the complex of needs, interests and values. On the basis of analyzing the shortcomings of the "economic" approach, according to which the need is generated by production, the definition of "needs", which is more consistent with modern approaches, is formulated as unresolved contradictions (or broken correspondences) between the human body and the surrounding reality. The phenomenon of interest, as the removal of dialectical contradiction between the inner world of man and the environment external to him, as well as a realized need is considered. The role of "motives" in the chain of "needs - interests - motives - stimuli" to action is defined. Motives in this interaction play the role of an internal inducement to activity, and stimulus (antistimulus) strengthen (weaken) this inducement. The problem of values, defined as the reason for the subject's actions, his position in relation to socially acceptable behavior, moral and socio-legal norms is analyzed. Values are considered as one of the sources of social development. The author's position is formulated, which consists in the fact that social policy, aimed mainly at meeting human needs, forms and preserves paternalistic and dependent expectations, while the policy that meets the interests of the individual, has as its goal the creation of conditions for his life activity, aimed at ensuring by his own efforts personal well-being and, thus, society as a whole. It is shown that practical ways and means of realization of human needs, interests and values from the point of view of public morality and laws model value orientations, which are the most important elements of the internal structure of personality, which people are guided by in their daily lives, and the goals they would like to achieve. The attitude of the state to the interests, values and needs of citizens in the USSR and the Russian Federation is analyzed. It is concluded that the deployment of human research from demographic processes to the analysis of interdependence and interaction of population, economy, social, spiritual spheres and politics allow us to identify the right ways to improve the quality of man and the quality of his life.

KEYWORDS

quality of the population, quality of life, needs, interests, values, demography, population, standard of the living of the population

AUTHORS BIOGRAPHIES

Nikolai S. Malikov

PhD in Philosophy, Аssistant Professor

Ivan F. Malikov

Student, Faculty of Humanities, Bachelor's program "Philosophy" of the Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia

The article was submitted 06.04.2023; approved after reviewing 08.05.2023; accepted for publication 16.05.2023.

PHILOSOPHICAL RESEARCH

Life as a Vital Activity: the Relationship between the Quality of the Population and the Quality of Its Life (Part I)

Nikolai S. Malikov, Ivan F. Malikov

Размер файла294-302 Размер файла  921.92 KB Размер файла Full text

INDEX

RAR (Research Article Report)

DOI: 10.52180/1999-9836_2023_19_2_12_294_302

EDN: UBOTIF

AUTHORS

Nikolai S. Malikov

Moscow, Russia

Ivan F. Malikov

Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia

FOR CITATION          

Malikov N.S., Malikov I.F. Life as a Vital Activity: the Relationship between the Quality of the Population and the Quality of Its Life (Part I). Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2023. Vol. 19. No 2. P. 294–302. https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2023_19_2_12_294_302

ABSTRACT

The presented first part of the article is devoted to the consideration of theoretical issues that reveal the concepts of "quality of population" and "quality of life", as well as their relationship. At the center of the study is a person and the historical analysis of social development. In contrast to the econocratic approach, the authors rely on the hypothesis of the complex influence of demographic processes of fertility, mortality, migration, family, relations between men and women, generations on the quality of the population and the quality of its life. It is shown that the influence of the economy on human behavior, including the actual demographic processes: fertility, mortality and migration, is large, but not comprehensive and far from linear. The authors draw the reader's attention to the interdependence of the quality of the population and the quality of its life. Their position is that it is necessary to recognize demography in accordance with its original meaning in the science of describing the people, and not by its "calculation", which continues to dominate in public practice. It is emphasized with a fact that demographic science, in the center of which is the study of the population as a system, its quantity and quality, allows to obtain the results of the long-term impact of demographic processes on the economy and politics necessary to improve the quality of the population based on the growth of the quality of its life. The quality of the population and the quality of its life in the presented study are considered in interaction and mutual influence. The methodological message of the authors - to go from a person, means the deployment of human research from demographic processes to the analysis of the interdependence and interaction of population, economics and politics. In the second part of the article, a person's life will be considered in the unity of a set of needs, interests and values that determine his quality, and the degree of satisfaction with their implementation will be the quality of their life.

KEYWORDS

quality of the population, quality of life, needs, interests, values, demography, population, standard of the living of the population

AUTHOR BIOGRAPHIES

Nikolai S. Malikov

PhD in Philosophy, Аssistant Professor, Moscow, Russia

Ivan F. Malikov

Student, Faculty of Humanities, Bachelor's program "Philosophy" of the Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia

REFERENCES

  1. Dugin A.G. Imagination. Philosophy, sociology, structures: Textbook for universities. Series: Theories of Society. Moscow: Academic project, 2015. 636 p. ISBN 978-5-8291-1828-0 (In Russ.)
  2. Toshchenko Zh.T. The Society of Trauma: Between Evolution and Revolution (Experience of Theoretical and Empirical Analysis). Moscow: Publishing house "The Whole World", 2020. 352 p. ISBN 978-5-7777-0801-4 (In Russ.)
  3. Subetto A.I. Quality of life of a person, society and humanity as a problem of survival strategy in the XXI century. St. Petersburg: Asterion, 2022. 40 p. (In Russ.)
  4. The level and quality of life of the population of Russia: from reality to the design of the future: [monograph]. V.N. Bobkov, T.E. Bobkova [et al.]; Ed. by V.N. Bobkov, N.V. Loktyukhina, E.F. Shamaeva; FCTAS RAS. Moscow: FCTAS RAS, 2022. 274 p. ISBN 978-5-89697-388-1, DOI 10.19181/monogr.978-5-89697-388-1.2022 (In Russ.)
  5. Inglehart R. Cultural evolution. How human motivations change and how it changes the world / Ttransl. from Eng. by S.L. Lopatina. 2nd ed. Moscow; Chelyabinsk: Society, 2020. 348 p.
  6. Regional features of demographic development of Russia in the XXI century. Ed. by L.L. Rybakovsky. Moscow: Publishing house "Econom-Inform", 2019. 162 p. (In Russ.)
  7. Toynbee A. J. Civilization before the judgment of history. The World and the West: [transl. from English]. Moscow: ACT: Astrel; Volodymyr: VKT. 2011. 318 p.
  8. Marx K., Engels F. Works. Vol. 14. Moscow-Leningrad: State Social and Economic Publishing House. 1931. 701 p. (In Russ.)
  9. Mukhacheva A.V. Quality of life of the population as a scientific category: theoretical approaches to definition. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. 2012;4(52):303-307. (In Russ.)
  10. Valentey D.I. Theory and policy of population. Moscow: Vysshaya shkola, 1967. 184 p. (In Russ.)
  11. Valentey D.I., Zvereva N.V. Study of population: questions of methodology. Moscow: Lomonosov Moscow State University Publishing House, 1987. 156 p. (In Russ.)
  12. Elizarov V.V. Theory and practice of demographic policy in the USSR. Statistics and Economics. 2017;14(5):71-84. https://doi.org/10.21686/2500-3925-2017-5-71-84 (In Russ.)
  13. Vishnevsky A.G. Reproduction of the population and society: History, modernity, a look into the future. Moscow: Finance and statistics, 1982. 287 p. (In Russ.)
  14. Demographic modernization of Russia, 1900-2000. Ed. by A. Vishnevsky. Moscow: New Publishing House, 2006. 601 p. ISBN 5-98379-042-0 (In Russ.)
  15. Iontsev V.A. International migration: population: theory and history of study. Moscow: Dialog-Lomonosov Moscow State University, 1999. 370 p. (In Russ.)
  16. Elizarov V.V. Selected works: collection of articles. Series "Demographic Studies". Issue 30. Ed. by N.G. Dzhanaeva, N.A. Zatonskikh, O.S. Chudinovskikh. Moscow: Faculty of Economics, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 2023. 228 p. (In Russ.)
  17. Strategy of demographic development of Russia. V.I. Arkhangelsky [et al.] Ed. by V.N. Kuznetsov, L.L. Rybakovsky; Russian Academy of Sciences, In-t soc.-polit. research. Moscow: Social Forecasting Center, 2005. 206 p. ISBN 5-98201-007-5 (In Russ.)
  18. Economic aspects of mortality and disability: loss of health and burden on health care. Ed. by Yu.V. Mikhailova, A.E. Ivanova. Moscow, 2006. (In Russ.)
  19. Antonov A.I., Medkov V.M. Sociology of the family. Moscow: Statistics, 1996. 303 p. (In Russ.)
  20. Ryazantsev S.V., Rostovskaya T.K. Evolution of Russia's Demographic Policy: Problems and Prospects. Russian youth: socio-demographic portrait and system of values in the context of the multinational basis of the Russian state. Moscow: Limited Liability Company "Publishing and Trading House "PERSPECTIVE". 2017;197-214. (In Russ.)
  21. Rybakovsky L.L. Migration of the population (questions of theory). Moscow: ISPI RAN, 2003. 238 p. (In Russ.)
  22. The quality and standard of living of the population in the new Russia: (1991-2005). V.N. Bobkov, N.A. Denisov, N.S. Malikov [et al.]. Moscow: All-Russian Center for Living Standards, 2007. 719 p. ISBN 978-5-87227-033-1 (In Russ.)
  23. Schultz T.W. Investment in Human Capital. The American Economic Review. 1961;51(1):1-17.
  24. Scenarios for the growth of the Russian economy, taking into account the contribution of human capital [Text]: report to the XX April International Academic Conference on the Development of the Economy and Society (Moscow, April 9-12, 2019). N.V. Akindinova, E.G. Yasin, D.A. Avdeeva [et al.]; National Research University Higher School of Economics. Moscow: Publishing House of the Higher School of Economics, 2019. 51 p. ISBN 978-5-7598-1891-5 (In Russ.)
  25. How rich is Russia. Comprehensive assessment of Russia's wealth from 2000 to 2017. World Bank. URL: https://www.vsemirnyjbank.org/ru/country/russia/publication/how-wealthy-is-russia (accessed: 12.04.2023). (In Russ.)
  26. Economic and social problems of Russia: Sat. sci. tr. No. 2: Aging of the population: Socio-economic consequences; Ed. comp. S.S. Kostyaev. RAS. INION. Center social. Sci.- Inform. Research. Otd. Economy. Moscow, 2013. 148 p. (In Russ.)
  27. Hegel G.V.F. Encyclopedia of Philosophical Sciences. In 3 vols. Vol. 1. The Science of Logic. Moscow: Thought. 1974. 452 p. (In Russ.)
  28. Hegel G.V.F. Works. In 14 vols. Vol. 8. Philosophy of history. Moscow-Leningrad: State Social and Economic Publishing House, 1935. 468 p. (In Russ.)
  29. Zborovsky G.E., Orlov G.G. Introduction to sociology: textbook. allowance. Ekaterinburg: Ural University Press, 1992. 224 p. (In Russ.)
  30. Spirkin A.G. Philosophy: textbook. 2nd ed. Moscow: Gardariki, 2006. 736 p. (In Russ.)
  31. Copenhagen Declaration on the Social Development. URL: https://www.un.org/ru/documents/decl_conv/declarations/copdecl.shtml (accessed: 26.04.2023).

The article was submitted 19.03.2023; approved after reviewing 14.05.2023; accepted for publication 16.05.2023.