ECONOMIC RESEARCH Hits: 511

ECONOMIC RESEARCH

Interregional Differentiation of Remuneration of Educators in Extracurricular Education (Part 1)

Sinitsa Arsenii L.

Размер файла86-98   Размер файла  1.33 KB Размер файла Full text

ИНДЕКСЫ СТАТЬИ

DOI: 10.52180/1999-9836_2023_19_1_7_86_98

EDN: PUYTPK

AUTHOR

Arsenii L. Sinitsa

Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia

e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8026-0619

Author ID: 574240

FOR CITATION

Sinitsa A.L. Interregional Differentiation of Remuneration of Educators in Extracurricular Education (Part 1). Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2023. Vol. 19. No 1. P. 86–98. DOI 10.52180/1999-9836_2023_19_1_7_86_98 EDN PUYTPK

ABSTRACT

The events of the last year have shown the importance and correctness of the course for the development of the training system in the development of all levels of the national education system. Extracurricular education, which is not compulsory, plays a special role in its structure, because it allows you to more fully reveal the potential of the child and make his development more harmonious. On the basis of Rosstat data we show that educators’ salaries continue to be rather low. The focus of our attention is on educators of extracurricular education who work in municipal educational institutions. These institutions are the backbone of the extracurricular education system. The Presidential decrees of 2012 made it possible to raise salaries in extracurricular education, but educators' salaries continue to be well below the regional average and the problem is far from being resolved. At the same time, there are significant inter-regional differences, which are caused primarily by economic reasons. In the more economically developed regions or in the regions with specialization in hydrocarbon extraction the state of educators is better. In agrarian regions with weak manufacturing industry, their salaries are lower. Plans to modernize extracurricular education and increase its contribution to the socio-economic development of the country are currently threatened by the rather low pay of educators, which does not correspond to the social importance of their work and can be eliminated in a reasonable time if the political will is present.

KEYWORDS

education system, extracurricular education, salary, educators, regions of Russia, economic specialization of the region, regional policy

INFORMATION ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Arsenii L. Sinitsa

Candidate of Economics, researcher of the Laboratory for Economic Education, Faculty of Economics, Lomonosov Moscow State University

REFERENCES

  1. Medynskiy E.N. Extracurricular education, its organization, meaning, and technique. Moscow: Nauka, 1916. 327 p. (In Russ.)
  2. Bray M. Researching shadow education: Methodological challenges and directions. Asia Pacific Education Review. 2010;11(1):3-13. DOI 10.1007/s12564-009-9056-6
  3. Bray M., Kwo O. Behind the façade of fee-free education: Shadow education and its implications for social justice. Oxford Review of Education. 2013;39(4):480-497. DOI 10.1080/03054985.2013.821852
  4. Dang H.A. The determinants and impact of private tutoring classes in Vietnam. Economics of Education Review. 2007;26(6):684-699. DOI 10.1016/j.econedurev.2007.10.003
  5. Manzon M., Areepattamannil S. Shadow educations: Mapping the global discourse. Asia Pacific Journal of Education. 2014;34(4):389-402. DOI 10.1080/02188791.2014.969194
  6. Smyth E. The more, the better? Intensity of involvement in private tuition and examination performance. Educational Research and Evaluation. 2008;14(5):465-476. DOI 10.1080/13803610802246395
  7. Stevenson, D.L., Baker D.P. Shadow education and allocation in formal schooling: Transition to university in Japan. American Journal of Sociology. 1992;97(6):1639-1657. DOI 10.1086/229942
  8. Liu J., Bray M. Determinants of demand for private supplementary tutoring in China: Findings from a national survey. Education Economics. 2017;25(2);205-218. DOI 10.1080/09645292.2016.1182623
  9. Luan X., Eacott S., Vass G. Supplementary no more: A relational analysis of supplementary education in China. Journal of Educational Administration and History. 2020;52(4):373-384. DOI 10.1080/00220620.2020.1726302
  10. Zhang W. The demand for shadow education in China: Mainstream teachers and power relations. Asia Pacific Journal of Education. 2014;34(4):436-454. DOI 10.1080/02188791.2014.960798
  11. Bray M., Lykins C. Shadow education: private supplementary tutoring and its implications for policy makers in Asia. Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre (CERC) in collaboration with Asian Development Bank (ADB), 2012. xi+ 98 p.
  12. Dawson W. Private tutoring and mass schooling in East Asia: Reflections of inequality in Japan, South Korea, and Cambodia. Asia Pacific Education Review. 2010;11(1):14-24. DOI 10.1007/s12564-009-9058-4
  13. Kobakhidze M.N. Corruption risks of private tutoring: Case of Georgia. Asia Pacific Journal of Education. 2014;34(4):455-475. DOI 10.1080/2f02188791.2014.963506
  14. Wang J., Li B. Supplementary education, student development and education equity: Evidence from primary schools in Beijing, China. Education Economics. 2018;26(5): 459-487. DOI 10.1080/09645292.2018.1460653
  15. Gordon E.W. The idea of supplementary education. In: Supplementary education: The hidden curriculum of high academic achievement. E.W. Gordon, B.L. Bridglall, and A. S. Meroe (eds.). Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2005. P. 320–334.
  16. Martirosyan B.P., Gorskiy V.A. Innovations in supplementary education. Dopolnitel’noe obrazovanie. 2003;(4):7-17. (In Russ.)
  17. Burdyak A.Ya. Supplementary classes in school subjects: Motivation and incidence. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny = Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes Journal. 2015;(2): 96-112. DOI 10.14515/monitoring.2015.2.08, EDN TTIFUX (In Russ.)
  18. Ivanyushina V.A., Aleksandrov D.A. Socialization through informal education: Extracurricular activities of Russian school students. Voprosy obrazovaniya = Educational Studies. Moscow. 2014;(3):174-196. DOI 10.17323/1814-9545-2014-3-174-196, EDN SXHKDN (In Russ.)
  19. Kosaretskiy S.G., Kupriyanov B.V., Filippova D.S. Specif­ic features of children involvement in supplementary education depending on cultural, educational and financial status of families and place of living. Voprosy obrazovaniya = Educational Studies. Moscow. 2016;(1):168-190. DOI 10.17323/1814-9545-2016-1-168-190, EDN VSARUX (In Russ.)
  20. Loginov D.M., Eliseeva M.A. Supplementary education for children in Moscow: Consumption strategies. SPERO.2012;(17):113-120. (In Russ.)
  21. Sobkin V.S., Kalashnikova E.A. Middle school student: Attitude to supplementary education. Voprosy psikhologii. 2013;(4):16-26, EDN TMCMDB (In Russ.)
  22. Sobkin V.S., Kalashnikova E.A. Attitude to supplementary education in students of the secondary and high school: Social and psychological aspects. Natsional’nyi psikhologicheskii zhurnal = National Psychological Journal. 2018;11(1):63-76. DOI 10.11621/npj.2018.0106, EDN XNRPTN (In Russ.)
  23. Bartko W.T., Eccles J.S. Adolescent participation in structured and unstructured activities: a person-oriented analysis. Journal of Youth and Adolescence. 2003;32(4):233-241. DOI 10.1023/A:1023056425648
  24. Lareau A., Weininger E.B., Conley D. What money doesn’t buy: Class resources and children’s participation in organized ex-tracurricular activities. Social Forces. 2015;9(2): 479-503. DOI 10.1093/sf/sov071
  25. Sjödin D., Roman C. Family practices among Swedish parents: Extracurricular activities and social class. European Societies. 2018;20(5):764-784. DOI 10.1080/14616696.2018.1473622
  26. Bennett P., Lutz A., Jayaram L. Beyond the schoolyard: The role of parenting logics, financial resources, and social institutions in the social class gap in structured activity participation. Sociology of Education. 2012;85(2):131-157. DOI 10.1177/0038040711431585
  27. Crispin L.M., Nikolaou D., Fang Z. Extracurricular participation and risky behaviours during high school. Applied Economics. 2016;49(34):3359-3371. DOI 10.1080/00036846.2016.1259752
  28. Darling N., Caldwell L.L., Smith R. Participation in school-based extracurricular activities and adolescent adjustment. Journal of Leisure Research. 2005;37(1):51-76. DOI 10.1080/00222216.2005.11950040
  29. Rees D.I., Sabia J.J. Sports participation and academic performance: Evidence from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health. Economics of Education Review. 2010; 29(5):751-759. DOI 10.1016/j.econedurev.2010.04.008
  30. Steinmann I., Strietholt R., Caro D. Participation in extracurricular activities and student achievement: Evidence from German all-day schools. School Effectiveness and School Improvement. 2018;30(2):155-176. DOI 10.1080/09243453.2018.1540435
  31. Arakelova A.O. Children’s schools of arts in the Russian Federation: Modern status and prospects of development. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta kul’tury i iskusstv = Bulletin of Kemerovo State University of Culture and Arts. 2017;(41-1):196-210. EDN YKHIPA (In Russ.)
  32. Tselishcheva E.F. Problems of transfer to effective work contract in municipal non-profit organizations of cultural establishments. Finansovaya analitika: problemy i resheniya = Financial Analytics: Science and Experience. 2015;(1):56-64. EDN TMEMOD (In Russ.)
  33. Sinitsa A.L. The influence of the ownership form on the educational organization on the salary of pedagogical employees. Ekonomicheskaya nauka sovremennoi Rossii = Economics of Contemporary Russia. 2019;(2):103-115. DOI 10.33293/1609-1442-2019-2(85)-103-115 EDN FFIEUT (In Russ.)
  34. Golyashev A.V., Grigor’ev L.M. Types of Russian regions: Stability and shifts in 2003–2013. Moscow: Analiticheskii tsentr pri Pravitel’stve Rossiiskoi Federatsii, 2014. 48 p. (In Russ.)

 

The article was submitted 03.10.2022.

Accepted for publication 01.02.2023.