ECONOMIC RESEARCH

Dynamics and Determinants of Job Satisfaction of Russians in the Characteristics of the Human Potential

Ekaterina A. Chernykh

Размер файла199-215  Размер файла  1.61 MB Размер файла Full text

INDEX

RAR (Research Article Report)

DOI: 10.52180/1999-9836_2023_19_2_4_199_215

EDN: FNPCJE

AUTHOR

Ekaterina A. Chernykh

Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Russia, Moscow

Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, Russia, Moscow

e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6970-487X

РИНЦ Author ID: 473083

WoS ReseacherID: AAF-7310-2021

 

FOR CITATION      

Chernykh E.A. Dynamics and Determinants of Job Satisfaction of Russians in the Characteristics of the Human Potential. Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2023. Vol. 19. No 2. P. 199–215. https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2023_19_2_4_199_215

ABSTRACT

The article shows the place of the concept of job satisfaction in the context of the reproduction of human potential. A review is made of foreign and domestic quantitative studies on the determinants of job satisfaction. Based on the data of the Russian Monitoring of the Economic Situation and Health of the Population of the National Research University Higher School of Economics (RLMS-HSE) for 2002-2021 and the Comprehensive Observation of Living Conditions of the Population-2020, an analysis of job satisfaction and its components in dynamics, as well as in the context of various socio-demographic groups, was carried out. The main trend over 20 years: a steady increase in the share of job satisfaction (by more than 20 percentage points) and a decrease in the share of dissatisfied by 5-6 times. The connection of job satisfaction with the general well-being and standard of living of the population is shown. It is shown that the statistical significance of the relationship of a number of indicators with job satisfaction is preserved over time (for 20 waves): satisfaction with wages, working conditions, professional growth, one's health, life; the level of education; trust in management and colleagues; the presence of subordinates, the change in material well-being for the year; self-assessment of material well-being; type of locality; the degree of anxiety about the ability to provide for oneself, etc. A descriptive analysis based on the Comprehensive Observation of Living Conditions of the Population-2020 data showed that the most “satisfied” categories with work are self-employed, people older than working age, those who have higher education. In general, women are more satisfied with all job satisfaction parameters (except earnings) than men. Satisfaction and dissatisfaction with job are explained by different factors, so the causes of these phenomena must be sought in different areas. The dynamics of the job satisfaction indicator can serve as an indicator of the quality of various social policy measures.

KEYWORDS

job satisfaction, dissatisfaction with job, working conditions, wages, human potential, gender differences, gender paradox

AUTHOR BIOGRAPHIES

Ekaterina A. Chernykh

PhD in Economics, Leading Research Associate, Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Science; Leading Research Associate, Research Center of Labour Economics, Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, Moscow, Russia

REFERENCES

  1. Soboleva I.V. Human potential of the Russian economy: problems of conservation and development. Moscow: Nauka. 2007. 202 p. (In Russ.)
  2. Podvoisky G.L. Human potential reproduction in the context of new challenges. Mir novoy ekonomiki=The World of the New Economy. 2022;16(3):63-74. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/2220-6469-2022-16-3-63-74
  3. Veredyuk O.V. Quality of youth employment in Russia: analysis of job satisfaction as sessments. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: Ekonomicheskiye i sotsial'nyye peremeny=Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes. 2018;(3):306- (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2018.3.16
  4. Locke E.A. What is job satisfaction? Organizational Behavior and Human Performance. 1969;4:309-336. URL: https://www.libs.uga.edu/reserves/docs/scans/job%20satisfaction.pdf (date of access: 08.12.2022).
  5. Clark A.E. Job satisfaction and gender: why are women so happy at work? Labour economics. 1997;4(4):341-372. https://doi.org/10.1016/S 0927-5371(97)00010-9
  6. OECD Guidelines on Measuring the Quality of the Working Environment. OECD Publishing. 2017. Paris.https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264278240-en
  7. Green F. Demanding work. The paradox of job quality in the affluent economy. Woodstock, Princeton University 2006. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/37153116_Demanding_Work_The_Paradox_of_Job_Quality_in_the_Affluent_Economy (date of access: 08.12.2022).
  8. Green F., Mostafa T. Trends in job quality in Europe. Publications Office of the European Union, Eurofound, Luxembourg. 2012. https://doi.org/10/2806/35164 URL: https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/sites/default/files/ef_publication/field_ef_document/ef1228en_0.pdf (date of access: 08.12.2022).
  9. Smirnykh L.I. Job satisfaction: the choice between stable employment and labor mobility. Ekonomika obrazovaniya=Economics of education. 2009;(4-2):32-39. (In Russ.)
  10. Chernykh E.A. Quality оf Working Life аnd Job Satisfaction on the Russian Labour Market. Uroven' zhizni naseleniya v regionakh Rossii=Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2022;18(2):214–226. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/19181/lsprr.2022.18.2.6
  11. ClarkE. What really matters in a job? Hedonic measurement using quit data. Labour Economics. 2001;8(2):223-242. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-5371(01)00031-8
  12. Griffeth R.W., Hom P.W., Gaertner S. A meta-analysis of antecedents and correlates of employee turnover: Update, moderator tests, and research implications for the next millennium. Journal of Management. 2000;26(3):463-488. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630002600305
  13. Hardy G.E., Woods D., Wall T.D. The impact of psychological distress on absence from work. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2003;88(2):306-314. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.2.306
  14. Lee T.H., Gerhart B., Weller , Trevor C.O. Understanding voluntary turnover: Path-specific job satisfaction effects and the importance of unsolicited job offers. Academy of Management Journal. 2008;51(4):651-671. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2008.33665124
  15. Judge T.A. et al. The job satisfaction-job performance relationship: A qualitative and quantitative review. Psychological Bulletin. 2001;127(3):376-407. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.127.3.376
  16. Warr P. Work, Happiness and Unhappiness. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. New York: Psychology Press. 2007. 562 р. ISBN 9780203936856, https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203936856
  17. Viswervaran C. Absenteeism and measures of job performance: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Selection and Assessment. 2002;10(1-2):12-17. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2389.00190
  18. Gomathy С.К. The Impact of Job Satisfaction on Workers’ Productivity. International journal of scientific research in engineering and management. 2022;06(02). https://doi.org/06.10.55041/IJSREM11593
  19. Lopes H., Lagoa S., Calapez T. Work autonomy, work pressure, and job satisfaction: An analysis of European Union countries. The Economic and Labour Relations Review. 2014;25(2):306-326. https://doi.org/10.1177/1035304614533868
  20. Spector P.E. Perceived control by employees: A meta-analysis of studies concerning autonomy and participation at work. Human Relations.1986;39(11):1005-1016. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872678603901104
  21. Spector P.E. Job Satisfaction: Application, Assessment Causes and Consequences. SAGE Publications, Inc. 1997. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452231549
  22. Andreassi J.K. et al. Cultural impact of human resource policies on job satisfaction across 48 countries. Cross Cultural Management. 2014;21(1):55-77. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCM-05-2012-0044
  23. Clark A.E. Measures of job satisfaction: What makes a good job? Evidence from OECD countries. OECD Labour Market and Social Policy Occasional Paper 1998;(34). OECD Publishing, Paris. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/670570634774
  24. Muñoz de Bustillo R., E. Fernandez Macías. Job satisfaction as an indicator of the quality of work. The Journal of Socio-Economics. 2005;34(5):656-673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2005.07.027
  25. Inceoglu , Fleck S. Engagement as a motivational construct. Handbook of Employee Engagement – Perspectives, Issues, Research and Practice; Ed. by S.L. Albrecht. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham. 2010. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849806374.00012
  26. Warr P., Inceoglu I. Job engagement, job satisfaction, and contrasting associations with person-job fit. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology. 2012;17(2):129-138. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026859
  27. Muñoz de Bustillo R. et al. Measuring More than Money: The Social Economics of Job Quality. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham. 2011. ISBN 978-1-84980-359-5. URL: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/libro?codigo=524031 (дата обращения: 08.12.2022).
  28. Locke E.A. The Nature and Causes of Job Satisfaction. Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (1st Ed.). Ed. by M.D. Dunnette. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally. 1976;1297-
  29. Ankudinov A.B., Belyaeva M.N., Lebedev O.V. Job satisfaction and its determinants: results of statistical modeling on panel data. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya=Sociological Research. 2013;(11):75-83. (In Russ.)
  30. Clark, Oswald A., Warr P. Is job satisfaction U‐shaped in age? Journal of occupational and organizational psychology. 1996;69(1):57-81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1996.tb00600.x
  31. Mohanty M.S. Relationship between Positive Attitude and Job Satisfaction: Evidence from the US Eastern Economic Journal. 2016;42(3):349-372. https://doi.org/10.1057/eej.2014.76
  32. Pita C., Torregrosa R. Education and Job Satisfaction. 2021. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.21579.72481
  33. Coverman S. Role overload, role conflict, and stress: Addressing consequences of multiple role demands. Social forc 1989;67(4):965-982. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/67.4.965
  34. Boles J.S., Wood J.A., Johnson J. Interrelationships of role conflict, role ambiguity, and work–family conflict with different facets of job satisfaction and the moderating effects of gender. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management. 2003;23(2):99-
  35. Bender K.A., Donohue, S.M., Heywood J.S. Job satisfaction and gender segregation. Oxford economic papers. 2005;57(3):479- https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/gpi015
  36. Poplavskaya A.A., Soboleva N.E. Satisfaction with various aspects of the work of men and women in Russia Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: Ekonomicheskiye i sotsial'nyye peremeny=Monitoring of public opinion: Economic and social changes. 2017;(5):271-288. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/14515/monitoring.2017.5.15
  37. Connolly S., Gregory M. Moving down: Women’s part-time work and occupational change in Britain, 1991-2001. IZA Discussion Paper. 2007;(3106). http://ftp.iza.org/dp3106.pdf (date of access: 08.12.2022).
  38. Booth A.L., van Ours J.C. Job satisfaction and family happiness: The part-time work puzzle. The Economic Journal. 2008;118(526):77-99. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2007.02117.x
  39. Freeman R. Job satisfaction as an economic variable, American Economic Review – Papers and Proceedings, 1978;68(2):135-141.
  40. Kotyrlo E.S. Not by Bread Alone: Job Satisfaction with State Employees Compared to Private Sector Employees. Higher School of Economics, 2023. URL: https://www.hse.ru/data/2023/02/14/2031925271/20230214.pdf (date of access: 18.03.2023).
  41. OECD Guidelines on Measuring the Quality of the Working Environment. OECD Publishing, 2017. Paris. http://doi.org/10.1787/9789264278240-en

The article was submitted 08.02.2023; approved after reviewing 05.04.2023; accepted for publication 16.05.2023.