PHILOSOPHICAL RESEARCH Hits: 229

PHILOSOPHICAL RESEARCH

The Posthuman Era as a Transhumanist Image of the Future

Ekaterina N. Gnatik, Igor K. Liseev

Размер файла284-293 Размер файла  875.77 KB Размер файла Full text

INDEX

RAR (Research Article Report)

DOI: 10.52180/1999-9836_2023_19_2_11_284_293

EDN: TFDEBS

AUTHORS

Ekaterina N. Gnatik

RUDN University, Moscow, Russia

е-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0745-5019

РИНЦ AuthorID: 250219

WoS ReseacherID: А-6561-2017

Scopus ID: 6506175741

Igor K. Liseev

Institute of Phylosophy of the RAS, Moscow, Russia

е-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

РИНЦ Author ID: 72155

ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2272-1250

WoS ReseacherID: V-6134-2017

Scopus ID: 57195835812

FOR CITATION

Gnatik E.N., Liseev I.K. The Posthuman Era as a Transhumanist Image of the Future. Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2023. Vol. 19. No 2. P. 284–293. https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2023_19_2_11_284_293

ABSTRACT

The article is devoted to the discussion of trends and problems of the modern expansion of transhumanist ideas. Analyzing the phenomenon of transhumanism, the authors note that this intellectual direction has designated as one of its main guidelines the creation of an artificial mind that surpasses the natural one, in order to use it as a tool to achieve complete power over a person. It is emphasized that, along with this, transhumanism declares itself as an international socio-political movement, the scale and activity of which correlate with the pace of development of NBIC technologies. At the same time, in various associations and movements, there is a whole range of versions and discrepancies in assessing the possibilities, effectiveness and necessity of applying the latest discoveries in the field of nanotechnology, genetic engineering, artificial intelligence technologies, robotics, neuroscience, etc. in order to transform human nature. The paper considers the main scientific and technological areas where adherents of transhumanism and technocrats count on success. Humanistic and other aspects of human cyborgization are discussed. The authors believe that the real goal of creating cyber systems and cyber prostheses is not to make life easier for the disabled, as it is declared, but to connect the computer with the human brain and create a single bio-cybernetic system with feedback. This may open up previously unprecedented opportunities for external influence on a person and the programming of social processes, which may mean the onset of the posthuman era. The article emphasizes that the problem of creating a strong artificial intelligence, the so-called human-like and superior machines, actually comes down to developing a set of measures to force a person to obey. In this regard, from the point of view of the authors, the growing global trend of immersion of the young generation in the virtual world raises serious concerns, since in this way the preparation of the basis, the substratum of the transhumanist society of the future is realized.

KEYWORDS

transhumanism, posthuman, cyborgization, NBIC-technologies, technosphere, artificial intelligence, neuroimplants, modification of human nature

AUTHORS BIOGRAPHIES

Ekaterina N. Gnatik

Doctor of Phylosophy, PhD Professor of the Department of Ontology and Epistemology at RUDN University, Moscow, Russia

Igor K. Liseev

Doctor of Phylosophy, Leading Researcher at the Institute of Phylosophy of the RAS, Moscow, Russia

REFERENCES

  1. Huxley J. New Bottles for New Wine. London: Chatto & Windus, 1957. 318 p.
  2. Minsky M. The Society of Mind. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1986. 339 p. ISBN 0671607405
  3. Minsky M. The Emotion Machine: Commonsense Thinking, Artificial Intelligence, and the Future of the Human Mind. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2007. 400 p. ISBN 9781416579304
  4. Moravec H. Robot: Mere Machine to Transcendent Mind. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999. 227 p. ISBN 9780195136302
  5. Kurzweil R. The Age of Intelligent Machines. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1990. 580 p. ISBN 0-262-11121-7
  6. Kurzweil R. The Age of Spiritual Machines: When Computers Exceed Human Intelligence. New York: Viking, 1999. 400 p. ISBN 0-670- 88217-8
  7. Kurzweil R. The Singularity is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology. New York: Viking, 2005. 652 p. ISBN 9780670033843
  8. Bostrom N. Artificial intelligence: stages, threats, strategies. Moscow: Mann, Ivanov and Ferber, 2016. 490 p. (In Russ.) ISBN 978-5-00057-810-0
  9. FM-2030. Optimism one; the emerging radicalism. New York: Norton, 1970. 249 p. ISBN 0393086119
  10. Ettinger R. Perspectives of immortality. Moscow: Scientific world, 2003. 261 p. (In Russ.) ISBN 5-89176-222-6
  11. Haraway D. The Cyborg Manifesto.Science, technology and socialist feminism in the 1980s. Moscow: Ad Marginem, 2017. 128 p. (In Russ.) ISBN 978-5-91103-374-3
  12. Meadows D.H., Meadows D.L., Renders J., Behrens III V.V. Limits of growth: Dokl. according to the project of Rome Club "Difficult position of mankind". Moscow: Publishing House of Moscow State University, 1991. 207 p. (In Russ.) ISBN 5-211-02014-6
  13. Gnatik E.N. Some philosophical-humanitarian problems of genetic. Voprosy Filosofii = Questions of Philosophy. 2004;(7):125-135. (In Russ.)
  14. Grebenshchikova E.G., Andreyuk D.S., VolchkovP.Yu., Vorontsova M.V., Ginter E.K., Izhevskaya V.L., Lagunin A.A., Polyakov A.V., Popova O.V., Smirnikhina S.A., Tishchenko P.D., Trofimov D.Yu., Kutsev S.I. Editing the genome of human embryos: an interdisciplinary approach. Vestnik RAMN = Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences. 2021;76(1):86–92. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15690/vramn1269
  15. Grebenshchikova E.G. 2020.04.011. Genome editing: continuity dynamics, convergence and changes in life engineering convergence, and change in the engineering of life. Martin P., Morrison M., Turkmendag I., Nerlich B., Mc Mahon A., Saille S., de, Bartlett A. New genetics and society. 2020;39(2):219–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/14636778.2020.1730166 Sotsial'nyye i gumanitarnyye nauki. Otechestvennaya i zarubezhnaya literatura. Seriya 8: Naukovedeniye. Referativnyy zhurnal= Social and Humanitarian Sciences. Domestic and foreign literature. Series 8: Science of Science. abstract journal. 2020;(4):94-108. (In Russ.)
  16. Gnatik E.N. Philosophical problems of eugenics: history and modernity. Voprosy Filosofii = Questions of Philosophy. 2005;(6):93-106. (In Russ.)
  17. Durnev R.A., Kryukov K.Yu., Titov A.E. Artificial intelligence: a comprehensive analysis of the state and development prospects. Innovatika i ekspertiza = Innovation and expertise. 2019;1(26):190-202. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.35264/1996-2274-2019-1-190-202
  18. Wilson B.S., Finley C.C., Lawson D.T. Better speech recognition with cochlear implants. Nature. 1991;(352):236–238. https://doi.org/10.1038/352236a0
  19. Weiland J.D., Cho A.K., Humayun M.S. Retinal Prostheses: Current Clinical Results and Future Needs. Ophthalmology. 2011;118(11):2227-2237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.08.042
  20. Deuschl G., Schade-Brittinger C., Krack P. et al. A Randomized Trial of Deep-Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease. New England Journal of Medicine. 2006;355:896-908. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa060281
  21. Liseev I.K. Ecological Thinking in the Formation of Civilizational Orientations of the Russian Society of the Digital Age. Voprosy Filosofii = Questions of Philosophy. 2023;(4):48–59. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2023-4-48-59

The article was submitted 06.04.2023; approved after reviewing 08.05.2023; accepted for publication 16.05.2023.