ECONOMIC RESEARCH Hits: 1446

ECONOMIC RESEARCH

Russian Education: Global and National Challenges to the Formation of Human Potential

Yakovleva Natal'ya G.

Размер файла36-46  Размер файла  411.26 KB Размер файла Full text

ИНДЕКСЫ СТАТЬИ

DOI: 10.52180/1999-9836_2023_19_1_3_36_46

EDN: GNWDCQ

AUTHOR

Natal’ya G. Yakovleva

Institute of Economics of the RAS, Moscow, Russia

e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

ORCID: 0000-0001-7839-8467

Author ID: 8081-9884

FOR CITATION

Yakovleva N.G. Russian Education: Global and National Challenges to the Formation of Human Potential. Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2023. Vol. 19. No 1. P. 36–46. DOI 10.52180/1999-9836_2023_19_1_3_36_46 EDN GNWDCQ

ABSTRACT

This article describes the transformations that the social sphere, including education, is undergoing in the modern economy under the influence of global and national challenges. Education in the modern economy is the most important sphere of human potential formation, ensuring the socioeconomic and technological development of the country. Therefore, the study of the ways of development and the definition of a progressive trend in the development of education in modern society is an important scientific and practical task. There are two main directions in the formation of the social sphere, in particular, education: marketization and socialization. The article considers the process of marketization of Russian education in post-Soviet Russia and its main manifestations, namely commercialization. This is reflected not only in the creation of the commercial education sector and private educational organizations, but also in the shift of the goals of the entire education system towards a market-oriented model. Commercialization and bureaucratization of Russian education, as well as its underfunding, are identified as the main national challenges for the formation of human potential corresponding to the level of development of modern society and economy. The main global challenge is the globalization of education, namely the subordination of national education systems to international institutions whose activities are determined by the goals of the development of global capital and the global economy, and not the development of human potential. As an alternative, the gradual formation of a socially-oriented model of education in our country is proposed. The main components of such a model are egalitarianism, accessibility, social orientation and democracy. Scientific research and real practices of modern economies of some countries show that a sociallyoriented model of education is both socially and economically effective

KEYWORDS

social sphere, education, human potential, socialization of education, commercialization of education, underfunding of education, national challenges to education, global challenges to education

INFORMATION ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Natal’ya G. Yakovleva

Doctor of Economics, Leading Researcher at the Center for Institutes of Socio-Economic Development of the Institute of Economics of the RAS, Moscow, Russia

REFERENCES

  1. Verenikin A.O., Verenikina A.YU. Human potential: fetishism of capitalist relations. Moscow: RUSAINS, 2021. 100 p. ISBN: 9785436566856 (In Russ.)
  2. Ivanov O.I. Human potential (formation, development, use). Institute of Problems of Regional Economy RAS. St. Petersburg State University. St. Petersburg. Skifiya-print, 2013. 336 p. ISBN 978-5-98620-108-5 (In Russ.)
  3. Bulavka -Buzgalina L.A. What is the time of the “future”? Chronotopes of the USSR. USSR – the era of transitivity. Culture: the search for the future. Navigation – Mayakovsky. Ed. by L.A. Bulavka-Buzgalina. Moscow. KomKniga. URSS. 2014: 25-54. ISBN 978-5-484-01343-2 (In Russ.)
  4. Arzumanyan M.A. Socially-oriented model of education as a factor of human potential development (on the example of Scandinavian countries). Obshchestvo i ehkonomika. 2022;8:106-121. DOI 10.31857/С020736760021500-9 (In Russ.)
  5. Dubrovin I.A. Achieving economic efficiency based on social justice in the Scandinavian economic model. Voprosy politicheskoi ehkonomii=Problems in Political Economy. 2022;1:162-181. URL: https://zenodo.org/record/6525596 (In Russ.)
  6. Dubrovin I.A. Theoretical foundations of the Scandinavian economic model: Stockholm Economic School and socialization of the capitalist system. Voprosy politicheskoi ehkonomii=Problems in Political Economy. 2021;2(26):117-131. URL: https://zenodo. org/record/5040328 (In Russ.)
  7. Yakovleva N.G. Production of public goods as a space for human potential development: contradictions and potential of Soviet practices. Ehkonomicheskaya nauka sovremennoi Rossii. 2021;4(95):148-151. DOI 10.33293/1609-1442-2021-4(95)-148-151 (In Russ.)
  8. Osipov A.M. Market mechanisms – the social impasse of Russian education. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii. 2019;28(5):63-72. DOI 10.31992/0869-3617-2019-28-5-63-72, EDN ZIQIYP (In Russ.)
  9. Ugryumova A.A. Marketization of education: pros and cons. Professional’noe obrazovanie. Stolitsa. 2013; № 5: 20-21. EDN QYPNUV (In Russ.)
  10. Yakovleva N.G. Commercialization of Russian higher education: historical and logical counterpoints. Ehkonomicheskoe vozrozhdenie Rossii. 2017;4(54):49-58. (In Russ.)
  11. Yakovleva N.G. Social consequences of the financialization of education. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya=Sociological Studies. 2019; 12:104-114. DOI 10.31857/S013216250007744-1 (In Russ.)
  12. Smolin O.N. Higher education and science: some systemic problems. Rektor VUZa. 2020; 5:4-23. EDN PCIQVA (In Russ.)
  13. Education that we can lose: Collection of articles. Under the general editorship of V.A. Sadovnichy. Moscow: MSU. 2002. 368 p. ISBN 5-9217-0017-7 (In Russ.)
  14. Musaelyan L.A., Zyryanov S.G. Global challenges of Russia and some problems of the domestic higher education system. Sotsium i vlast’. 2022;2(92):40-52. DOI 10.22394/1996-0522-2022-2-40-52, EDN DHSWTY (In Russ.)
  15. Yakovleva N.G. Commercialization, bureaucratization, managerization of education in post-Soviet Russia: a political economic view. Problemy teorii i praktiki upravleniya. 2017;3:122-131. EDN YFURVR (In Russ.)
  16. Shvetsov YU.G. On bureaucratization and stagnation in the educational and scientific sectors of the non-productive sphere of the Russian Federation. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ehkonomika. 2017;37:265-273. DOI 10.17223/19988648/37/20, EDN: YFMUFD (In Russ.)
  17. Yakovleva N.G. Contradictions of transformation and the genesis of a socially-oriented model of education (politico-economic approach). Voprosy politicheskoi ehkonomii=Problems in Political Economy. 2021;3:183-197. URL: https://zenodo.org/record/5554163 (In Russ.)
  18. Strumilin S.G. Problems of labor economics. Essays and sketches. Moscow: Labor issues, 1925. 224 p. (In Russ.)
  19. Kapustin E.I. Theorist and practitioner of national economic forecasting. Ehkonomicheskaya nauka sovremennoi Rossii. 2003;3:147-157. EDN XSJJUP (In Russ.)
  20. Denison E.F. Contribution of knowledge to economic growth: cross-country analysis. Soviet–American Symposium of Economists. Moscow: Progress, 1978. (In Russ.)
  21. Acosta-Ormaechea S., Morozumi A. Can a government enhance long-run growth by changing the composition of public expenditure? IMF Working Paper. № WP/13/162. 2013. ISBN: 9781475550597/1018-5941
  22. Barbiero O., Cournède B. New econometric estimates of long-term growth effects of different areas of public spending. OECD Economics Department Working Papers. 2013;1100. DOI 10.2139/ssrn.2650044
  23. Card D. and A.B. Krueger. Does school quality matter? Returns to education and the characteristics of public schools in the United States. Journal of Political Economy, 1992;100 (1):1-40.
  24. Imbens G. and J. Angrist. Identification and estimation of local average treatment effects. Econometrica, 1994;61:467-476.

 

 

The article was submitted 29.12.2022.

Accepted for publication 30.01.2023.