ECONOMIC RESEARCH

Interregional Differentiation of Remuneration of Educators in Extracurricular Education (Part 2)

Arsenii L. Sinitsa

Размер файла169-180  Размер файла  1.15 MB Размер файла Full text

INDEX

RAR (Research Article Report)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2023_19_2_1_169_180

EDN: DGHWNE

AUTHOR

Arsenii L. Sinitsa

Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia,

e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

ORCID : https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8026-0619

РИНЦ Author ID: 574240

WoS ReseacherID: E-6607-2017

FOR CITATION

Sinitsa A.L. Interregional Differentiation of Remuneration of Educators in Extracurricular Education (Part 2). Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2023. Vol. 19. No 2. P. 167–178. https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2023_19_2_2_167_178

ABSTRACT

Despite the task of raising the salaries of educators in extracurricular education to the level of salaries of educators in general education that was set at the highest level, this problem has not yet been solved in most regions. Nevertheless, the Presidential decrees allowed us to approach this goal to some extent, which means that they are partially effective. During the period of validity of the decrees there has been an increase in the purchasing power of educators' salaries, expressed in affordable subsistence minimums, although its dynamics has been contradictory. This means that the evaluation of the results of state policy in the field of remuneration of educators of extracurricular education is a vital issue. Differences between regions in both the ratio of salaries and affordable subsistence minimums remain high. This is primarily due to the different level of economic development of the regions. In more economically developed regions or in regions with specialization in hydrocarbon extraction the state of educators employees is better. In agrarian regions with weak manufacturing industry, their salaries are lower. There are some exceptions, which on the whole do not make much difference to the overall picture. To improve the situation, measures are needed to develop and diversify regional economies, increase the basic salary of educators and provide them with benefits (especially in rural areas), more actively inform the population and officials about the importance of this component of personal development and strengthen the information support of current policies. Changes in policy are required promptly due to the unstable geopolitical situation and the need for accelerated development of the domestic economy.

KEYWORDS

extracurricular education, salary, purchasing power, subsistence minimum, educators, regions of Russia, regional policy

AUTHOR BIOGRAPHY

Arsenii L. Sinitsa

PhD in Economics, researcher of the Laboratory for Economic Education, Faculty of Economics, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia

REFERENCES

  1. Golyashev A.V., Grigor'ev L.M. Types of Russian regions: Stability and shifts in 2003–2013. Moscow: Analiticheskii tsentr pri Pravitel'stve Rossiiskoi Federatsii, 2014. 48 p. (In Russ.)
  2. Belekhova G.V., Rossoshanskii A.I., Chekmareva E.A. Opportunities to improve living standard of the population due to the growth of wages. Voprosy territorial'nogo razvitiya=Territorial Development Issues. 2015;8(28):1-16. URL: http://vtr.isert-ran.ru/article/1632?_lang=en. (date of vizit: 25.01.2023) (In Russ.)
  3. Levchenko O.V. The effect of the purchasing power of the population on the mortality of children under 5 years. Zdorov'e naseleniya i sreda obitaniya=Public Health and Life Environment. 2016;12(285):7-10. (In Russ.)
  4. Levchenko O.V. The effect of the purchasing power of the population on infant mortality. Zdorov'e naseleniya i sreda obitaniya=Public Health and Life Environment. 2017;1(286):33-36. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/35627/2219-5238/2017-286-1-33-36
  5. Litvintseva G.P. Monetary income of population of regions of Russia with account of purchasing power of ruble and hidden income. Voprosy Statistiki. 2008;(6):29-38. (In Russ.)
  6. Litvintseva G.P., Voronkova O.V., Stukalenko E.A. Regional income inequality and poverty level in Russia: An analysis adjusted for the purchasing power of the ruble. Problemy prognozirovaniya. 2007;6(105):119-131. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.1134/S1075700707060081
  7. Litvinov V.A. Purchasing power of Russians in the crisis. Uroven' zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii=Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2009;(8-9):98-104. (In Russ.)
  8. Sinitsa A.L. Salaries as a factor of the family size of the pedagogical employees in general education. Nauchnye trudy: Institut narodnokhozyaistvennogo prognozirovaniya RAN=Transactions of the Institute for National Economic Forecasts RAS. 2019;17:415-435. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.29003/m828.sp_ief_ras2019/415–435
  9. Rzhanitsina L.S., Soboleva I.V. On the methodology for determining the subsistence level indicator. Uroven' zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii=Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2012;(10-11):98-108. (In Russ.)
  10. Korneichuk B.V. New methodology for calculating the subsistence minimum: problems of theory and practice. Ekonomicheskaya politika=Economic Policy. 2021;16(6):120-139. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2021-6-120-139
  11. Goodlad J. A place called school. Moscow: Prosveshchenie, 2008. 475 p. (In Russ.)
  12. Azgal'dov G.G., Bobkov V.N., El'meev V.Ya., Perevoshchikov Yu.S., Belyakov V.A. Qualimetry of life. Moscow: All-Russian Center for Living Standards, 2006. 820 p. (In Russ.)
  13. Bobkov V.N. Questions of the theory, methodology of studying and assessing the quality and standard of living of the population. Uroven' zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii=Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2009;(6):3-15. (In Russ.)
  14. Bobkov V.N. Economic aspects of demographic policy in Russia. Uroven' zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii=Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2013;(3):4-6. (In Russ.)
  15. Avraamova E.M., Klyachko T.L., Loginov D.M., Polushkina E.A., Semionova E.A., Tokareva G.S. Monitoring school effectiveness. What has changed in the teacher's work in recent years (2014-2017). T.L. Klyachko (ed.). Moscow: RANKhiGS, 2018. 35 p. URL: https://www.ranepa.ru/images/News/2018-04/24-04-2018-3-monitoring-shkola.pdf (accessed: 25.01.2023). (In Russ.)
  16. Sinitsa A.L. Problems and trends in the development of mass and elitist systems of general education in the Far North. Arktika i Sever=Arctic and North. 2021;(44):173-200. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37482/issn2221-2698.2021.44.173
  17. Elizarov V.V., Sinitsa A.L. Factors of poverty of families with children and prospects of its reductionю Uroven' zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii=Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2019;2(212):63-75. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24411/1999-9836-2019-10065
  18. Сanсrin E.F. World wealth, national wealth and the state economy, or a new look at political economy. In: World wealth and national economy. Moscow: Delo Publishing House, RANEPA. 2018; 133-309. (In Russ.)

The article was submitted 03.10.2023; approved after reviewing 02.05.2023; accepted for publication 16.05.2023.