ECONOMIC RESEARCH Hits: 1503

ECONOMIC RESEARCH

TITLE

Quality of Working Life of School Teachers: Measurement Experience in the Vologda Region

Galina V. Belekhova, Galina V. Leonidova

Размер файла483-500  Размер файла  463.97 KB Размер файла Full text

INDEX

RAR (Research Article Report)

https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2023_19_4_2_483_500

EDN IQDANP

AUTHORS

Galina V. Belekhova

Vologda Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Vologda, Russia

e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-6373-9043

РИНЦ Author ID: 630621

ResearcherID: I-8182-2016

ScopusID: 57194492144

Galina V. Leonidova

Vologda Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Vologda, Russia

e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

ORCID: https://orcid.org/000-0003-0361-2099

РИНЦ Author ID: 77412

ResearcherID: I-7139-2016

ScopusID: 55377958600

FOR CITATION

Belekhova GV, Leonidova GV. Quality of Working Life of School Teachers: Measurement Experience in the Vologda Region. Uroven' zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii=Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2023;19(4):483–500. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2023_19_4_2_483_500

ABSTRACT

School teachers’ fulfilment in work and the effectiveness of the educational process depend on the qualitative characteristics of working life. The conditions and organization of work, wages, professional relationships and relations with students, system of motivation and development, social recognition in one way or another affect the professional activities of school teachers. The purpose of the study is to identify the features and patterns of the quality of the working life of school teachers, including depending on their socio-professional characteristics. The research is based on a survey of teachers of secondary schools in the Vologda Oblast, conducted by the Vologda Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences using the Google Forms platform in April-May 2020. The list of studied components of the quality of working life is formed taking into account the specifics of teaching work. The quality of working life was studied in terms of self-assessment in the context of teachers' satisfaction with its main components. The results demonstrate high satisfaction with the psychological climate, low satisfaction with wages and the social significance of the profession. It was defined that there were no differences in the assessments of satisfaction with the components of working life, depending on gender, presence of children and territorial affiliation of the school. The research revealed high commitment to the profession: only 30% of teachers are ready to leave the educational sphere if possible. The longer the employment period and the higher the professional category, the fewer teachers are ready to change jobs. At the same time, with an increase of the qualification level and teaching experience, there is a decrease in the level of satisfaction with most components of working life. In conclusion proposed some management areas that can help improve the quality of the working life of school teachers.

KEYWORDS

quality of working life, school teacher, subjective approach, sociological survey, satisfaction, teaching experience, remuneration, working conditions, social significance of work

AUTHORS BIOGRAFY

Galina V. Belekhova

PhD in Economics, Senior Researcher; Vologda Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Vologda, Russia

Galina V. Leonidova

PhD in Economics, Associate Professor, Leading Researcher, Head of the Center of Social and Demographic Research, Vologda Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Vologda, Russia

REFERENCES

  1. Abankina I.V., Derkachjov P.V., Vavilova A.A. (ed.), et al. Remuneration for teachers: how to change the situation for the better. Moscow: NRU HSofE; 2021. 68 p. (In Russ.) ISSN 2500-0608
  2. Soloveva T.S. The status of a teacher in the modern Russian society. Sotsial'noe prostranstvo=Social area. 2018;(1). (In Russ.) https:// doi.org/10.15838/sa/2018.1.13.3
  3. Shafranov-Kutsev G.F., Efimova G.Z. Specifics of life and pedagogical activity in the Far North (in terms of the Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous District). Arktika i Sever=Arctiс and North. 2017;(26):136-150. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17238/issn2221-2698.2017.26.136
  4. Bergis T.A., Krivulya Ju.S. The problem of professional stress of teachers in the modern educational system. Karel'skij nauchnyj zhurnal=Karelian Scientific Journal. 2020;9(1):47–49. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26140/knz4-2020-0901-0013
  5. Milyaeva L.G. Theoretical and methodological approaches and methods of complex analysis of quality of working life. Social'notrudovye issledovanija=Social and labour research. 2019;(1):6–18. (In Russ.)
  6. Golovina S.Yu. From the program of decent work to the concept of the quality of working life. In: International labor standards and national legislation on labor and social security (to the 100th anniversary of the ILO): collection of articles of the V international scientificpractical conference on November 1-2, 2019. Minsk. 2019;15-20. (In Russ.) ISBN: 978-985-497-350-0
  7. Chernykh E.A. Quality of working life and job satisfaction of Russian women and men: a comparative analysis. Social'no-trudovye issledovanija=Social and labour research. 2023;(3):87–103. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.34022/2658-3712-2023-52-3-87-103
  8. Loktyukhina N.V., Chernykh E.A. Quality of working life of remote employees: methodological approaches and first assessments for the EU and Russia. Uroven' zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii=Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2021;17(1):42-56. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.19181/lsprr.2021.17.1.4
  9. Horst D.J., Broday E.E., Bondarick R. еt al. Quality of working life and productivity: an overview of the conceptual framework. International Journal of Managerial Studies and Research (IJMSR). 2014;2(5):87-98. ISSN 2349-0330 (Print); ISSN 2349-0349 (Online)
  10. Chernykh E.A. Quality оf working life аnd job satisfaction on the Russian labour market. Uroven' zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii=Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2022;18(2):214-226. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.19181/lsprr.2022.18.2.6
  11. Bobkov V.N. (resp. ed.), Loktyukhina N.V., Shamaeva E.F. The level and quality of life of the population of Russia: from reality to the design of the future: monograph. Moscow: FCTAS RAS; 2021. 274 р. (In Russ.) ISBN 978-5-89697-388-1
  12. Zholudeva V.V., Melnichenko N.F. Statistical evaluation of the quality of working life of employees in the Russian Federation. Statistika i ekonomika=Statistics and Economics. 2018;15(4):42-51. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21686/2500-3925-2018-4-42-51
  13. Korel L.V., Kombarov V.Yu. The quality of working life at a modern industrial enterprise (results of a sociological survey of engineers). EKO=ECO. 2011;1(10):102-117. (In Russ.)
  14. Chernykh E.A. Dynamics and determinants of job satisfaction of Russians in the characteristics of the human potential. Uroven' zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii=Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2023;19(2):199-215. (In Russ.) https://doi. org/10.52180/1999-9836_2023_19_2_4_199_215
  15. Veredyuk O.V. Quality of youth employment in Russia: analysis of job satisfaction assessments. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny=Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes. 2018;(3):306-323. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2018.3.16
  16. Locke E.A. The Nature and Causes of Job Satisfaction. In: Dunette M.D., ed. Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally, 1976. Р. 1297–1349. ISBN 0528629123
  17. Temnitskiy A.L. Satisfaction with work at the enterprise as a determining factor in the quality of the working life of workers in Russia. In: Modern management. Problems, hypotheses, research: collection of scientific papers. Iss. 4: at 2 pm. Part 2. Moscow.: Ed. home of the Higher School of Economics. 2012;231-238. (In Russ.)
  18. Tatarova G.G., Bessokirnaya G.P. Satisfaction with work as a construct in empirical studies. Sotsiologicheskii zhurnal=Sociological Journal. 2017;23(1):8-26. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.19181/socjour.2017.23.1.4999
  19. Rosmiller R. The secondary school principal teachers’ quality of work life. Educational Management Administration and Leadership. 1992;20(3):132-146. https://doi.org/10.1177/174114329202000302
  20. Hart P. Teacher Quality of work life: interpreting work experiences, psychological distress and morale. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. 1994;67(2):109-132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1994.tb00555.x
  21. Manju N.D. Quality of work life perception of school teachers. International Journal of Education and Psychological Research. 2014;3(2):77-80. e-ISSN: 2279-0179
  22. Volosnikova L.M., Ignatjeva S.V., Fedina L.V. et al. Teacher in an inclusive classroom: relationship between attitudes towards inclusive education and job satisfaction. Voprosy obrazovanija=Educational Studies Moscow. 2022;(2):60–87. (In Russ.) https://doi. org/10.17323/1814-9545-2022-2-60-87
  23. Polutin S.V., Manannikova Yu.V. The Processes of bureaucratization and debureaucratization of teachers’ work and their influence on the quality of teachers’ professional activity: sociological project results. Integracija obrazovanija=Integration of Education. 2020;24(1):75–97. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15507/1991-9468.098.024.202001.075-097
  24. Ermolin A.V., Gorodilov P.V. Representation in the minds of teacher’s satisfaction with the quality of working life. Professional'nye predstavleniya=Professional Perceptions. 2019;(1):158-164. (In Russ.)
  25. Golovchin M.A. Attitudes of urban and rural teachers towards educational work: on the materials of sociological monitoring. Nauka i shkola=Science and School. 2018;(1):110-118. (In Russ.)
  26. Golovchin M.A., Soloveva T.S. Social and professional well-being of the Russian school teachers during the period of reforms and counter-reforms. Idei i idealy=Ideas and Ideals. 2018;10(3):233-252. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17212/2075-0862-2018-3.2-233-252
  27. Manina V.A., Petrakova A.V., Kulikova A.A. et al. Teachers’ coping strategies and job satisfaction in distance teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie=Psychological Science and Education. 2023;28(1):52–65. (In Russ.) https:// doi.org/10.17759/pse.2023000001
  28. Leonidova G.V., Valiakhmetov R.M., Baimurzina G.R., et al. Problems and prospects of distance learning in the estimates provided by teachers and schoolchildren’s parents. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz=Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast. 2020;13(4):202-219. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15838/esc.2020.4.70.12
  29. Sivrikova N.V., Chernikova E.G., Sokolova N.A. Teachers’ satisfaction with life and educational process as predictors of their social and psychological adaptation. Vestnik Novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta=Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2017;7(6):87–100. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15293/2226-3365.1706.06
  30. Volchik V.V., Posukhova O.Yu. Education reforms and precariatization of school teachers. TERRA ECONOMICUS. 2017;15(2):122– 138. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.23683/2073-6606-2017-15-2-122-138
  31. Il'in V.A. (sc. ed.), Shabunova A.A., Kalachikova O.N. (gen. eds.), et al. Teacher and educational reform: a view from the region: monograph. Vologda: FGBUN VolRC RAS, 2018;178 p. (In Russ.) ISBN 978-5-93299-404-7
  32. Chernyshov S.A. Massive shift of schools towards distance learning in the estimates of a local pedagogical community. Obrazovanie i nauka=The Education and Science Journal. 2021;23(3):131-155. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2021-3-131-155
  33. Kozina I.M., Serezhkina E.V. Measuring psychosocial risks and quality of work life among Russian professionals. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny=Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes. 2021;(3):21-40. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2021.3.1891
  34. Voznesenskaya E.D. How modern young people see the world of professions: changesin the status quo. In: Dimensions of Russian education. Moscow: Center for Sociological Research. 2015;326-357 (In Russ.)

The article was submitted 19.08.2023; approved after reviewing 01.11.2023; accepted for publication 01.12.2023.