ECONOMICAL RESEARCH

TITLE

 Quality of Life as an Indicator of the Effectiveness of Advanced Development Areas

Ol'ga A. Romanova, Gyl'iya F. Galiullina

Размер файла499-514
Размер файла  2.828 MB Размер файла Full text

 

INDEX

RAR (Research Article Report)

JEL R12
https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2024_20_4_2_499_514

AUTHORS

Ol'ga A. Romanova

Institute of Economics of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Ekaterinburg, Russia

e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6463-4008

SPIN-code: 7848-9423

RSCI AuthorID: 138737

ResearcherID: K-3318-2018

Gyl'iya F. Galiullina

Institute of Economics of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Ekaterinburg, Russia

Kazan Federal University - Naberezhnye Chelny Institute, Naberezhnye Chelny, Russia

e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8470-1079

SPIN-code: 1156-6068

RCSI AuthorID: 517986

ResearcherID: A-1762-2018

FOR CITATION

Romanova O.A., Galiullina G.F. Quality of Life as an Indicator of the Effectiveness of Advanced Development Areas. Uroven' zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii=Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2024;20(4):499–514. https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2024_20_4_2_499_514 (In Russ.)

Abstract

The advanced development area is an effective tool for regulating the country's economic development. However, the existing preferential regime for doing business does not take into account the growing importance of improving the standard and quality of life of the population of these territories. The purpose of the article is to substantiate the need to supplement the indicators characterizing the effectiveness of advanced development areas with quality of life indicators. The methodological tools of the study are based on the use of the basic provisions of the methodology of the Institute of Socio-Economic Problems of Population named after N.M. Rimashevskaya, according to which seven components of the standard and quality of life are determined. The study is based on the example of advanced development areas created in single-industry towns. Such territories have currently been created in 84 single-industry towns, where 1,430 residents are registered. 8.5 years have passed since the creation of the first advanced development area in a single-industry town, but to date no methodology has been developed for determining the effectiveness of their activities. The article tested the hypothesis that the quality of life is a significant indicator of the effectiveness of activities in the advanced development areas. The analysis of the main characteristics of the socio-economic development of single-industry towns that shape the quality of life of the population allowed us to form a "portrait of the advanced development area that is most attractive to residents", to establish the use by residents, using the example of the advanced development area «Naberezhnye Chelny», of existing labor-intensive technologies that are ineffective in the context of a shortage of labor resources and the country's focus on achieving technological sovereignty. The need to adjust regulatory legal acts in the field of advanced development areas is substantiated, in terms of requirements for business plans of potential residents with the inclusion of quality of life indicators differentiated in accordance with the type of economic activity of residents and the socio-economic characteristics of single-industry towns. It is proposed to use these indicators to assess the effectiveness of advanced development areas created in single-industry towns.

Keywords

priority development area, single-industry town, quality of life, quality of working life, labor productivity, average monthly wage, residents, efficiency

AUTHORS BIOGRAFY

Ol'ga A. Romanova – Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor, Chief Research Associate, Institute of Economics of the Ural Branch of RAS

Gyl'iya F. Galiullina – PhD in Economics, Associate Professor, Senior Researcher, Institute of Economics of the Ural Branch of RAS; Head of the Department of Economics of Enterprises and Organizations, Kazan Federal University – Naberezhnye Chelny Institute

References

  1. Shamaeva E.F. Methodological basis for modeling the quality of life of the population. Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2021;17(1):87–101. https://doi.org/10.19181/lsprr.2021.17.1.7 (In Russ.)
  2. Bobkov V.N. Uroven' i kachestvo zhizni v Rossiiskom obshchestve: (2014–2016 gg.). Rossiiskii ehkonomicheskii zhurnal. 2017;6:79–94 (In Russ.)
  3. Uroven' i kachestvo zhizni naseleniya Rossii: ot real'nosti k proektirovaniyu budushchego: [monografiya]. N. Bobkov, T.E. Bobkova [i dr.]; pod red. V.N. Bobkova (otv. red.), N.V. Loktyukhinoi, E.F. Shamaevoi; FNISTS RAN. M.: FNISTS RAN; 2022. 274 p. (In Russ.)
  4. Monitoring dohodov i urovnja zhizni naselenija Rossii – 2023 god: [Ezhegodnik]. Vyp. 2 (203). Otv. red. V.N. Bobkov, A.A. Guljugina, E.V. Odincova [i dr.]; otv. red. V.N. Bobkov, A.A. Guljugina. M.: IJe RAN; 2024. 182 p. (In Russ.)
  5. Okrepilov V.V., Gagulina N.L. Development of Estimating Quality of Life of Regional Population. Zhurnal Economicheskoj Teorii [Russian Journal of Economic Theory], 2019;16(3):318-330. https://doi.org/10.31063/2073-6517/2019.16-3.1 (In Russ.)
  6. Okrepilov V.V., Gagulina N.L. Modeling and Assessment of the Quality of Life in Macro-Regions of Russia Based on the Methodology of Quality Economics. Prostranstvennaya Ekonomika = Spatial Economics, 2023;19(4): 170–186. https://dx.doi.org/10.14530/se.2023.4.170-186 (In Russ.)
  7. Spiridonov A.Yu., Naydenova A.A. Kachestvo zhizni naseleniya: podkhody k opredeleniyu ponyatiya, formirovanie sistemy sbora dannyh i metodiki otsenki [Quality of life: approaches to definition, data collection system and assessment techniques]. Ekonomika truda. 2024;11(8):1159–1180. https://doi.org/10.18334/et.11.8.1214388 (In Russ.)
  8. Ustinova O.E. Kachestvo zhizni: podkhody k opredeleniyu i osobennosti motivatsii naseleniya [Quality of life: approaches to the defi nition and features of the motivation of the population]. Kreativnaya ekonomika. 2022;16(7):2873–2890. https://doi.org/10.18334/ce.16.7.114894 (In Russ.)
  9. Kozlova O.A. Metodicheskii podkhod k izmereniyu kachestva zhizni naseleniya regiona / O.A. Kozlova, T.V. Gladkova, M.N. Makarova, E.KH. Tukhtarova // Ehkonomika regiona=Economy of Regions. 2015;2:183-193. https://doi.org/10.17059/2015-2-15 (In Russ.)
  10. Pupavac D., Delibasic M., Pupavac J., Streimikis J. Interdependence of Quality of Life and Happiness of the Population in Southeast European Countries. Montenegrin Journal of Economics. 2020;16(4):7-15.
  11. Bagavandas M. Development of multifactor index for assessing quality of life of a tribal population of India: multilevel analysis approach. BMC Public Health. 2021;21:383 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-10338-2
  12. Yerezhepova A., Dauliyeva G., Maisanova R. Human Development Index as an integral indicator of the quality of life of the population. Problems of AgriMarket. 2023;3:191-201. https://doi.org/10.46666/2023-3.2708-9991.19.
  13. Payne S.L., Lloyd S., Francis B. Regional Inclusive Growth Through Systems Philanthropy in Essex County, Massachusetts. The Foundation Review. 2020;12(4). https://doi.org/10.9707/1944-5660.1543
  14. Galiullina G. Comparative analysis of operational frameworks of special economic areas in Russia. R-Economy. 2019;5(1):25-37. https://doi.org/10.15826/recon.2019.5.1.004
  15. Galiullina G.F., Mansurova T.G., Gallyamova E.F. Qualitative assessment of the potential of innovative development of territories. Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques. 2019;7:1195-1199.
  16. Korotaev A.V., Malkov S.Yu., Musieva Dzh. K optimizatsii global'nykh demograficheskikh protsessov. Istoriya i sovremennost'. 2022;4(46):81-103. (In Russ.)
  17. Kuznetsov B.L., Kuznetsova S.B. Vysokie tekhnologii – strategiya razvitiya monogorodov. Sotsial'no-ehkonomicheskie i tekhnicheskie sistemy: issledovanie, proektirovanie, optimizatsiya. 2017;1(74):60-68. (In Russ.)
  18. Afanasev A.A. Stanovlenie ogranichenno otkrytoy ekonomiki suverennogo tipa v sovremennoy Rossii: ponyatie, etapy, suschnostnye kharakteristiki [Limited open sovereign economy in modern Russia: concept, stages, characteristics]. Ekonomicheskie otnosheniya. 2022;12(3):345- https://doi.org/10.18334/eo.12.3.115123 (In Russ.)
  19. Romanova O.A., Sirotin D.V. Ot industrii 4.0 k industrii 5.0: problemy i vozmozhnosti razvitiya metallurgii Rossii. Stal'; 2024;1:46-52 (In Russ.)
  20. Dolzhenko R.A., Dolzhenko S.B., Polovinko V.S. Applied Labor Economics in Conditions of Double Personnel Shortage: Revival and New Challenges.Part 1. Uroven' zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii=Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2024;20(2):163–171. https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2024_20_2_2_163_171 (In Russ.)
  21. Dolzhenko R.A., Dolzhenko S.B., Polovinko V.S. Applied Labor Economics in Conditions of Double Personnel Shortage: Revival and New Challenges. Part 2. Uroven' zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii=Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2024;20(3):371–384. https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2024_20_3_4_371_384 (In Russ.)
  22. Awumbila M., Delali B., Teye J. Migration in a Globalizing World: Perspectives from Ghana. Sub-Saharan Publishers. 2018. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvh8r2m4.
  23. Vicentiy I.V., Popova O.N. Migration Intentions and Quality of Life of the Murmansk Region Population. Theory and Practice of Social Development. 2023;10:71–76. https://doi.org/10.24158/ti-por.2023.10.7 (In Russ).
  24. Aleksandrova O.А. The problem of personnel shortage in the industrial sector of the economy: reasons and directions for solution. Uroven' zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii=Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2024;20(2):150-162. https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2024_20_2_1_150_162 (In Russ.)
  25. Yakusheva M.S. Evolyutsiya ponyatiya kаchestvа trudovoy zhizni [Evolution of the concept of “quality of working life”]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomika – Tomsk State University Journal of Economics. 2016;4(36):63–72. (In Russ.)