Uncategorised Hits: 56

SOCIOLOGICAL RESEARCH

TITLE

Internet (Non)use by People with Disabilities: Extent and Barriers to 
Internet Access

 Sofia V. Korzhuk, Aleksandra Ya. Burdyak

Размер файла645-656
 Размер файла  2.828 MB Размер файла Full text

 

INDEX

RAR (Research Article Report)

JEL D63
https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2024_20_4_12_645_656

AUTHORS

Sofia V. Korzhuk

The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, Institute of Applied Economic Research, Moscow, 
Russia

e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8914-0138

SPIN-cide: 9604-0340

RSCIAuthor ID: 896620

Scopus Author ID: 5719449371

Aleksandra Ya. Burdyak

The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, Institute of Applied Economic Research, Moscow, 
Russia

e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1134-8550

SPIN-code: 8576-6888

RSCI Author ID: 694422

Scopus Author ID: 57194382944

For citation

Korzhuk S.V., Burdyak A.Ya. Internet (Non)use by People with Disabilities: Extent and Barriers to Internet Access. Uroven' zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii=Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2024;20(4):645–656. https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2024_20_4_12_645_656 
(In Russ.)

Abstract

This article examines the involvement of the population in Internet use and the barriers they face in access to the net with a particular focus on people with disabilities, one of the most vulnerable groups. Providing basic access to the Internet for socially vulnerable groups of the population is a pressing task in the context of reducing digital inequality. The object of the study is digital inequality, the subject is the factors of digital inequality. The purpose is to study the contribution of disability, other characteristics of the individual, including place of residence, to digital inequality. The analysis is based on two Rosstat surveys data for 2022 with the sample of 153 thousand respondents. The proportion of Internet users within the general population and among people with disabilities is described, highlighting age-related differences. The study assesses barriers to Internet use controlling for age, education level, family size, type of settlement, employment status, and regional standard of living using logistic regression models. Age appears to be the most powerful predictor of Internet (non)use, older individuals are less likely to use the Internet. Education and employment status are significant factors too, affecting not only the likelihood of Internet use but also the motivation to use it and the availability of relevant skills. The digital integration of people with disabilities is significantly less than that of their peers without disabilities. All else being equal, disability reduces the likelihood of Internet use by 1.7 times. Regions with high standard of living are associated with greater digital inclusion of the population, which means that support for digitalization processes should be targeted on regions with medium or low standard of living. Lack of motivation and lack of skills are the two main barriers to overcome; both are higher for people with disabilities all else being equal.

 

Keywords

disability, people with disabilities, digitalization, digital inequality, barriers to Internet access, assistive technologies, internet accessibility, factors of digital inequality

Acknowledgments

the article was written on the basis of the RANEPA state assignment research programme

AUTHOR'S BIOGRAFY

Sofia V. Korzhuk – Candidate of Sociological Sciences, Senior Researcher, Center «Institute of Social Analysis and Prediction» IAER RANEPA

Aleksandra Ya. Burdyak – Senior Researcher, Center «Institute of Social Analysis and Prediction» IAER RANEPA

References

  1. Kalabikhina I.E. Demographic Reflections on the Digital Economy. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta =Moscow University Economic Bulletin. 2019;6:147–166 (In Russ.)
  2. Kalabikhina I., Kolotusha A. Is the Internet a health-preserving factor in Russia? Demograficheskoe obozrenie=Demographic Review. 2020;7(3):150–182. https://doi.org/10.17323/demreview.v7i3.11641 (In Russ.)
  3. Grishina E., Tsatsura E. The Effect of Caring for Older and Disabled Relatives on The Employment, Health And Economic Status Of Caregivers. Demograficheskoe obozrenie=Demographic Review. 2020;7(2):152–171. https://doi.org/10.17323/demreview.v7i2.11142 (In Russ.)
  4. Sinyavskaya O., Gorvat E. Long-Term Care for The Elderly and Disabled People: Motivations for Turning to Various Care Providers. Demographic Review. 2021;8(4):60–80. https://doi.org/10.17323/demreview.v8i4.13876 (In Russ.)
  5. Van Dijk J.A. The Deepening Divide: Inequality in the Information Society. SAGE Publications; 2005. 224 p.
  6. Korzhuk S.V., Skachkova G.S. Disability. Scientific and educational portal "Great Russian Encyclopedia". 2023; 10. https://doi.org/10.54972/00000001_2023_10_30
  7. Dimaggio P., Hargittai E., Celeste C., et al. Digital Inequality: From Unequal Access to Differentiated Use. Social Inequality. Russell Sage Foundation; 2004. 355–400.
  8. Goggin G. Disability and Digital Inequalities. Rethinking Digital Divides with Disability Theory. Theorizing Digital Divides. London: Routledge; 2017. 63–75.
  9. Wilson E.J. The Information Revolution and Developing Countries. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press; 2004. 456 p.
  10. Ragnedda M. The Third Digital Divide: A Weberian Approach to Digital Inequalities. NY: Routledge; 2017. 127 p.
  11. Jaeger P.T. Assessing Section 508 Compliance on Federal E-Government Web Sites: A Multi-Method, User-Centered Evaluation of Accessibility for Persons with Disabilities. Government Information Quarterly. 2006;23(2):169–190.
  12. Tsatsou P. Is Digital Inclusion Fighting Disability Stigma? Opportunities, Barriers, And Recommendations. Disability & Society. 2020;36(5):702–729. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2020.1749563
  13.  Vicente M.R., López A.J. Multidimensional Analysis of the Disability Digital Divide: Some Evidence for Internet Use. The Information Society. 2010:26(1):48–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/01615440903423245
  14. Dobransky K., Hargittai E. Unrealized Potential: Exploring the Digital Disability Divide. Poetics. 2016;(58):18–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2016.08.003
  15. Kolybashkina N., Sukhova A., Ustinova M., et al. Barriers and Opportunities to Employment for Persons with Disabilities in the Russian Federation. World Bank Group; 2021. 180 p. URL: https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099335011302129130/pdf/P175164082c1900f10b0d300c9326d7e3c8.pdf (access date: 25.03.2024) (In Russ.)
  16. . Tsatsou P. Digital Inclusion of People with Disabilities: A Qualitative Study of Intra-Disability Diversity in The Digital Realm. Behaviour & Information Technology. 2019;39(5):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2019.1636136
  17.  Scanlan M. Reassessing the Disability Divide: Unequal Access as The World Is Pushed Online. Universal Access in the Information Society. 2022;(21):725–735. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-021-00803-5
  18. Disability And the Social Status of Disabled People in Russia. Ed. by T. M. Maleva. Moscow: Publishing House Delo RANEPA; 2017. 256 p. ISBN 978-5-7749-1213-1 (In Russ.)
  19. Korzhuk S.V. The Social Exclusion of People with Disabilities: The Reproduction of Imparity. Monitoring Obshchestvennogo Mneniya: Ekonomicheskie I Sotsial'nye Peremeny=Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes. 2016;(3):134–146. https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2016.3.07 (In Russ.)