ECONOMIC RESEARCH

TITLE

Structure of Regional Population Qualities: a Classification of Attributes

Natalia P. Neklyudova

Размер файла000
Размер файла  2.828 MB Размер файла Full text

INDEX

RAR (Research Article Report)

JEL J11, R23

https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2025_21_2_6_245_258

AUTHOR

Natalia P. Neklyudova

Institute of Economics, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Ekaterinburg, Russia 

e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

OCRID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5026-1394

SPIN-code: 2555-0827

RSCI AuthorID: 623998

ResearcherID: Е-5849-2014

FOR CITATION

Neklyudova N.P. Structure of Regional Population Qualities: a Classification of Attributes. Uroven' Zhizni Naseleniya Regionov Rossii=Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2025;21(2):245-258. https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2025_21_2_6_245_258 (In Russ.)

Abstract

Structuring the properties of the population is an integral part of analyzing the standard of living. It allows for a shift from abstract indicators to specific measures that take into account the diverse needs of different groups. Without this, neither effective social policy nor the achievement of sustainable development goals is possible. The quality of the population, as an integral category, encompasses numerous characteristics such as age structure, education level, professional qualifications, health, and cultural traits, which determine economic activity and sustainable development of a region. However, there is still no universally accepted classification of population properties, which complicates planning and forecasting. The aim of the article is to develop a classification of population properties in a region that can be used for managing demographic development. The author sets the task of structuring qualitative characteristics of the population to move from abstract indicators to specific measures that consider the diverse needs of various groups. The information sources used in the article include the Russian National Corpus, scientific publications from the eLIBRARY.RU electronic library, and the Google Scholar search engine. The study analyzes scientific approaches to defining the quality of the population, identifying key components such as health, education, cultural values, and demographic behavior. The research methodology involved a two-stage analysis. In the first stage, a linguistic corpus analysis and content analysis of scientific texts were conducted to identify adjectives collocating with the term "population composition" and associated with demographic processes. In the second stage, key facets were extracted using intent analysis, and a classification of population property elements was developed based on a structural-functional approach. The results of the study are presented as a classification that includes physiological, gender, socio-economic, ethnic, cultural, and migration characteristics of the population. The proposed classification enables a more accurate analysis of the demographic situation in a region, forecasting economic activity, and developing targeted social programs. The conclusions of the work emphasize the importance of considering the diversity of population properties for the sustainable development of regions. The developed classification can be used for planning socio-economic policies, improving the quality of life of the population, and ensuring the long-term development of territories.

Keywords

population quality, population composition, population structure, classification of population attributes, demographic development, demographic structure, management of demographic development

AUTHOR'S BIOGRAFY

Natalia P. Neklyudova

PhD in Economics, Senior Researcher, Institute of Economics, Ural Branch Russian Academy of Sciences

References

  1. Nutakor J.A, Zhou L., Larnyo E., Addai-Danso S., et al.  Socioeconomic Status and Quality of Life: an Assessment of the Mediating Effect of Social Capital. 2023;11(5):749. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11050749
  2. Razumov A.A. Living Standards and Quality of Life of Population in Russia: the New Turns of Scientific Research. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya=Sociological Studies. 2023;(7):164-169. https://doi.org/10.31857/S013216250026598-0 (In Russ.)
  3. Shirov A.A. The Quality of life as a Factor in the Development of the Russian Economy. Vestnik Rossiiskoi akademii nauk=Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences.2024;94(2):89-96. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0869587324020016 (In Russ.)
  4. Ermakova E.R. Quality of Life of the Population in the System of National Interests. Natsional'nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost'=National Interests: Priorities and Security.2025;21(1):4-17. https://doi.org/10.24891/ni.21.1.4 (In Russ.)
  5. Lokosov V.V. Human Potential: Conceptual Approaches and Measurement Methods. Narodonaselenie=2023;26(4):4-14. https://doi.org/10.19181/population.2023.26.4.1 (In Russ.)
  6. Ryumina E.V. Specifics of Individual Indicators of Quality of Life and Population Quality. Upravlenie Ekonomicheskimi Sistemami=Economic Systems Management.2018;(10(116)):24. (In Russ.)
  7. Ryumina E.V. Qualitative Characteristics of Population and the State of the Economy: Analysis of Certain Groups of Russian Regions. Narodonaselenie=2020;23(3):16-26. https://doi.org/10.19181/population.2020.23.3.2 (In Russ.)
  8. Ryumina E.V. Analysis of Characteristics of the Human Potential and Quality of Life in Ural Regions. Narodonaselenie=2021;24(3):32-41. https://doi.org/10.19181/population.2021.24.3.3 (In Russ.)
  9. Gushcho Y.P. Demographic Characteristics of the Russian Population. Narodonaselenie= 2024;27(1):95-108. https://doi.org/10.24412/1561-7785-2024-1-95-108 (In Russ.)
  10. Fedotov A.A. Human Potential and Quality of Population: Approaches to Definition. Mezhdunarodnyi zhurnal gumanitarnykh i estestvennykh nauk=International Journal of Humanities and Natural Sciences.2020;(3-2(42)):79-86. https://doi.org/10.24411/2500-1000-2020-10266 (In Russ.)
  11. Fedotov A.A. Quality of Life and Human Potential in the Concepts of Sustainable and Human Development (part 1). Narodonaselenie=2021;24(2):53-65. https://doi.org/10.19181/population.2021.24.2.5 (In Russ.)
  12. Fedotov A.A. Quality of Life and Human Potential in the Concepts of Sustainable and Human Development (part 2). Narodonaselenie=Population.2021;24(3):42-50. https://doi.org/10.19181/population.2021.24.3.4 (In Russ.)
  13. Simakova N.A., Pyatin M.A. Mental Health as an Aspect of Health and the Quality of the Population (on the Example of the Penza Region). Kul'tura i tsivilizatsiya=Culture and Civilization.2022;12(5A):160-169. https://doi.org/10.34670/AR.2022.50.10.018 (In Russ.)
  14. Simakova N.A., Pyatin M.A. Morbidity of Children as an Important Indicator of Health Culture and the Quality of the Population. Pedagogicheskii zhurnal=Pedagogical Journal.2024;14(6A):243-250. (In Russ.)
  15. Malikov N.S., Malikov I.F. The Relationship between Population Quality and Quality of Life (Part I). Uroven' zhizni naseleniia regionov Rossii=Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia.2023;19(2):294-302. https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2023_19_2_12_294_302 (In Russ.)
  16. Malikov N.S., Malikov I.F. The Relationship between Population Quality and Quality of Life (Part II). Uroven' zhizni naseleniia regionov Rossii=Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia.2023;19(3):444-451. https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2023_19_3_11_444_451 (In Russ.)
  17. Woods R, Rees P. Population Structures and Models: Developments in Spatial Demography.London: Taylor & Francis; 2023. 460 p. ISBN 9781003430346
  18. Kipnis A. Suzhi: A Keyword Approach. The China Quarterly.2006;(186):295-313. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741006000166
  19. Jacka T. Cultivating Citizens: Suzhi (Quality) Discourse in the PRC. 2009;17(3):523-535. https://doi.org/10.1215/10679847-2009-013
  20. Kong S. Embodied Suzhi: Constituting Middle-Class Subjectivity in Post-Socialist China. Body and 2024;30(3):95-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X241268217
  21. Lou J. Shifting Narratives of Suzhi (Quality) and Suzhi Education: What Migrant and Rural Children in China Tell Us About the Changing Nature of Chinese Education. Chinese Education and Society.2024;57(1-2):15-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/10611932.2024.2377006
  22. Zhang Y., Jin H., Xiao Y., et al. What are the Effects of Demographic Structures on Housing Consumption?: Evidence from 31 Provinces in China. Mathematical Problems in Engineering.2020;2020:6974276. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6974276
  23. Clark E.C., Cranston E., Polin T., et al. Structural Interventions that Affect Racial Inequities and their Impact on Population Health Outcomes: A Systematic Review. BMC Public Health.2022;22(1):1-29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14603-w
  24. Krupowicz J., Kuropka I. Convergence of Population Structures of the European Union Member States -The Past and the Future. 2022;14(2):1024. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14021024
  25. Pifarré I Arolas H., Acosta E., Dudel C., et al. US Racial-Ethnic Mortality Gap Adjusted for Population Structure. 2023;34(3):402-10. https://doi.org/10.1097/ede.0000000000001595
  26. Bea S.S. Factors Affecting the Happiness Index of Economically Active Population Characteristics by Region in Korea. The Korean Journal of Health Service Management.2024;18(2):41-57. https://doi.org/10.12811/kshsm.2024.18.2.041
  27. Alklycheva U.A. The Essence and Structure of Quality of the Population. Voprosy strukturizatsii ekonomiki. 2013;(4):366-9. (In Russ.)
  28. Yoon S., Goh H., Kwan Y.H., et al. Identifying Optimal Indicators and Purposes of Population Segmentation through Engagement of Key Stakeholders: a Qualitative Study. Health Research Policy and Systems.2020;18(1):1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-019-0519-x
  29. Loginova N.N., Zhulina M.A. Population Quality: Experience of Socio-Demographic Research. Regionologiya=Russian Journal of Regional Studies. 2001;(4(37)):298-308. (In Russ.)
  30. Dantsiger D.G., Filimonov S.N., Andrievsky B.P., Chasovnikov K.V. Quality of Life of the Population in the Eyes of the Organizer of Health Care. Meditsina v Kuzbasse=Medicine in Kuzbass.2022;21(2):35-8. https://doi.org/10.24412/2687-0053-2022-2-35-38. (In Russ.)
  31. Polyzos S., Minetos D. Informal Housing in Greece: a Quantitative Spatial Analysis. Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management.2009;4(2(11)):7-33.
  32. Frolova E.V., Rogach O.V., Razov P.V. Participatory Budgeting as a Mechanism for Improving the Quality of Life of the Population. Narodonaselenie=Population.2023;26(2):66-77. https://doi.org/10.19181/population.2023.26.2.6. (In Russ.)
  33. Rimashevskaya N.M. Qualitative Potential of the Russian Population: A Look into the 21st Century. Problemy prognozirovaniya=Studies on Russian Economic Development. 2001;(3):34-48. (In Russ.)
  34. Mazyrko A.A. Living Standards of the Population as the Main Factor of Sustainable Socio-Economic Development of the Regions of the Republic of Belarus. Vestnik Grodnenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta imeni Yanki Kupaly. Seriya 5. Ekonomika. Sotsiologiya. Biologiya=Bulletin of Yanka Kupala State University of Grodno. Series 5. Sociology. Biology. 2021;11(1):47-55. (In Russ.)
  35. Leshchenko Y.A. The Quality of the Population is the Most Important Factor and Criterion of Social Reproduction. In: The VII International Scientific-Practical Conference «Social Consolidation and Social Reproduction of Modern Russian Society: Resources, Problems, and Prospects» Conference Proceedings; February 15, 2021, Irkutsk, Russia. Irkutsk: Irkutsk State University. 2021:54-9. (In Russ.)
  36. Saakyan A.A. The Category of Quality in Philosophy and the Science of Language. Evrazijskij gumanitarnyj zhurnal=Eurasian Humanitarian Journal.2024;(1):34-43. (In Russ.)
  37. Sharandin A.L. Category of Representation of a Qualitative Predicative. Voprosy kognitivnoj lingvistiki=Issues of Cognitive Linguistics.2021;(2):28-36. https://doi.org/10.20916/1812-3228-2021-2-28-36 (In Russ.)
  38. Tishkov V.A. Where Russian Ethnology Came From and Where It Is Going: A Personal View in a Global Perspective. Vestnik Rossijskoj akademii nauk=Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences.2021;91(3):215-31. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0869587321030105 (In Russ.)
  39. Sharipov A.R., Abramova Z.F. Obzor ponyatii «Ehtnos», «Natsiya», «Narod» v nauchnoi literature XX veka. In: The IV International Scientific Conference Dedicated to the Memory of Rinat Mukhametovich Yusupov «Ethnogenesis. History. Culture» Conference Proceedings; November 12, 2021; Ufa, Russia. Ufa: Ufa Federal Research Center of RAS. 2021:411-3. https://doi.org/10.31833/12-11-2021-IV-411-413 (In Russ.)
  40. Tishkov V.A. Natsiya natsij: o podhodah k ponimaniyu Rossii.Moscow: Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology named after N.N. Miklukho-Maklay RAS; 2023. 69 p. ISBN 978-5-4211-0299-1 https://doi.org/10.33876/978-5-4211-0299-1/2023-12/1-69 (In Russ.)
  41. Pain E.A. Nation and Ethnos: the Nonlinear Evolution of Ethnological Concepts in Russia. Mir Rossii. Sotsiologiya. Etnologiya=Universe of Russia. Sociology. Ethnology.2024;33(1):6-28. https://doi.org/10.17323/1811-038X-2024-33-1-6-28 (In Russ.)
  42. Mishchuk S.N. Factors of Non-Migration as an Element of Migration Processes Management. Society and Security Insights.2022;5(3):103-17. https://doi.org/10.14258/ssi(2022)3-07