ECONOMIC RESEARCH

TITLE

Housing Provision for Households with Children in Modern

Alla K. Guzanova

2.828 MB

Full text

INDEX

RAR (Research Article Report)

JEL R21

https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2025_21_1_3_43_58

AUTHOR

Alla K. Guzanova 

Institute of Socio-Economic Studies of Population named after N.M. Rimashevskaya - Branch of the Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia

e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

OCRID: https://orcid.org/0000-003-4221-5002

SPIN-code: 9425-6581

RSCI AuthorID: 123178

ResearcherID: C-9958-2017

Scopus Author ID: 57195527990

FOR CITATION

Guzanova A.K. Housing Provision for Households with Children in Modern Russia. Uroven' zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii=Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2025;21(1):43-58. https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2025_21_1_3_43_58 (In Russ.)

Abstract

In the implementation of effective family policy, a place is ensured by ensuring affordable housing. The object of our study was households with children, inclusion - their housing security. The purpose of the study is to identify problems associated with improving the living conditions of households with children in Russia. For the analysis, data from representative monitoring sociological surveys of households «Comprehensive observations of the living conditions of the population» conducted by Rosstat in 2011-2022 were used. Estimates of housing рrovision were obtained depending on the socio-demographic composition of households. Households with children are characterized by a marked deterioration in housing conditions in the presence of two or more children, cramped housing, especially urban apartments, living in individual houses of large families, and a low level of improvement of their homes. For the worse, large and young families stand out. The dynamics of housing provision shows that with an increase in the average Russian indicators, the situation of families with children is not getting better. At the same time, housing provision for households without children is growing, especially those living alone. The consequences of the mass construction of multi-storey small-sized housing over the years have been investigated. It is shown that this has influenced demographic indicators towards an increase in the proportion of households without children, especially single ones. With such trends, the implementation of a family policy aimed at increasing the birth rate seems problematic. More than half of large families live in their own homes rather than apartments. The actual living conditions and preferences of families with children suggest that for them the massive construction of individual housing could be one of the main means of solving the housing problem. The primary task is also to increase the level of housing improvement and the development of road and engineering infrastructure. A State social policy is needed to improve housing рrovision for families with children.

Keywords

housing conditions, households with children, home improvement, housing needs, individual homes, housing improvement, family policy

AUTHOR'S BIOGRAFY

Alla K. Guzanova

Senior Researcher at the Laboratory of Socio-Economic Problems of Housing Policy at the Institute of Socio-Economic Studies of Population named after N.M. Rimashevskaya - Branch of the Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences

References

1. Yarasheva A.V. (ed.), Aleksandrova O.A. Alekseeva O.A., et al. Osnovy Ehkonomicheskogo Povedeniya i Blagosostoyaniya Naseleniya. Moscow: ISESP FCTAS RAS; 2024. 351 p. ISBN 978-5-89697-433-8 https://doi.org/10.19181/monogr.978-5-89697-433-8.2024 (In Russ.)
2. Bobkov V.N. (ex. ed.), Loktyukhina N.V., Shamaeva E.F. (eds.), et al. Uroven' i Kachestvo Zhizni Naseleniya Rossii: ot Real'nosti k Proektirovaniyu Budushchego. Monograph. Moscow: FCTAS RAS; 2022. 274 р. ISBN 978-5-89697-388-1 https://doi. org/10.19181/monogr.978-5-89697-388-1.2022 (In Russ.)
3. Bobkov V.N., Gulyugina A.A., Odintsova Е.V. About the Risks in the Sphere of Living Standards of the Russian Population, Opportunities and Solutions to Reduce them. Uroven' Zhizni Naseleniya Regionov Rossii=Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2024;20(1):59–75. https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2024_20_1_6_59_75 (In Russ.)
4. Odintsova E.V., Chashchina T.V., Kozlova M.B., Mochalov D.A. The Quality of Housing Conditions for Households with Children: a Twenty-Year Retrospective. Uroven' Zhizni Naseleniya Regionov Rossii=Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2024;20(4): 543–554. https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2024_20_4_5_543_554 (In Russ.)
5. Natsun L.N. Assessing the Needs and Opportunities of Families with Children in Improving Housing Conditions. Problemy Razvitiya Territory=Problems of Territory’s Development. 2023;27(5):150–167. https://doi.org/10.15838/ptd.2023.5.127.10 (In Russ.)
6. Zavisca J.R., Gerber T.P., Suh H. Housing Status in Post-Soviet Contexts: A Multi-dimensional Measurement Approach. Social Indicators Research. 2020;153(2):609–634. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02477-7
7. Ceriani L., Olivieri S., Ranzani M. Housing, Imputed Rent, and Household Welfare. The Journal of Economic Inequality. 2023;21(1(2)):138–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-022-09545-7
8. Kosareva N.B., Polidi T.D. Housing Affordability in Russia and Foreign Countries. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2019;(7):29-51. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2019-7-29-51 (In Russ.)
9. Anacker K.B. Introduction: Housing Affordability and Affordable Housing. International Journal of Housing Policy. 2019;19(1):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/19491247.2018.1560544
10. Chashchina T.V. The State Policy for the Improvement of the Housing Conditions of Families with Children in Modern Russia (2002–2024 years). Uroven' Zhizni Naseleniya Regionov Rossii=Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2024;20(4):555–570. https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2024_20_4_6_555_570 (In Russ.)
11. Eliseeva I. I., Bochenina M. V. Demand in the Housing Market and the Needs of Russian People: an Econometric Approach. Ekonomicheskoe Vozrozhdenie Rossii=Economic Revival of Russia. 2022;(4(74)):41-56. https://doi.org/10.37930/1990-9780-2022-4-74-41-56 (In Russ.)
12. Sinelnikov A.B. Separation of Generations in Families as a Factor for Reducing Birth Rate. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya=Sociological Studies. 2022;(5):36-48. https://doi.org/10.31857/S013216250020195-7 (In Russ.)
13. Guzanova A.K., Shneiderman I.M. Housing Problem from the Point of View of Family Values ​​and Preferences. Uroven' Zhizni Naseleniya Regionov Rossii=Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2018;14(1): 66–76. https://doi.org/10.24411/1999-9836-2018-10008 (In Russ.)
14. Schneiderman I.M., Pilipenko I.V. Upgrading Water Supply and Wastewater Collection Systems in Rural Areas as a Way to Improve Quality of Life of the Population of Russia. Narodonaselenie=Population. 2022;26(1):147-159. https://doi.org/10.19181/ population.2023.26.1.12 (In Russ.)
15. Nefedova T.G., Starikova M.M. Migration as a Way of Population Adaptation to the Polarization of Space at the Center of Russia. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya=Sociological Studies. 2020;(10):24-38. https://doi.org/10.31857/S013216250009567-6 (In Russ.)
16. Simagin Yu.A., Murtuzalieva D.D., Van'kina I.N. Dostupnost' Sobstvennogo Zhil'ya v Moskve dlya Zhitelei Regionov Rossii. Dokhody, Raskhody i Sberezheniya Naseleniya Rossii: Tendentsii i Perspektivy Conference Proceedings; November 27, 2023; Moscow, Russia. Moscow: ISESP FCTAS RAS. 2024:250-256. (In Russ.)
17. OvcharovaN. (ex.ed.), Prokofieva L.M. (ex. ed.), Avraamova E.M., et al. Sem'ya i Deti v Rossii: Osobennosti Sovremennoi Zhizni i Vzglyad v Budushchee. Monograph. Moscow: ISESP RAS; 2009. 274 p. ISBN 978-5-903198-18-4 (In Russ.)
18. Lokosov V. V., Pilipenko I. V., Schneiderman I. M. Low-Rise Housing as a Priority in Raising Housing Space Availability to Families in the Russian Federation. Narodonaselenie=Population. 2024;27(S1):161-176. https://doi.org/10.24412/1561-7785-2024-S1-161-176 (in Russ.)
19. Dobrokhleb V. G., Dronov V. N., Makhrova O. N. Youth Motivation for Creating a Family in the Region. Vestnik MIRBIS. 2019;20(4):206-212. https://doi.org/10.25634/MIRBIS.2019.4.22 (in Russ.)

ECONOMIC RESEARCH

TITLE

Quality of Working Life in Russian Regions

Ekaterina A. Chernykh

000

2.828 MB

Full text

INDEX

RAR (Research Article Report)

JEL J08, J21, J31, J81, J31, J38, J28

https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2025_21_1_2_28_42

AUTHOR

Ekaterina Alekseevna Chernykh

Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow Russia

Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, Moscow Russia

e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

OCRID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6970-487X

SPIN-code: 7693-1149

RSCI AuthorID: 473083

ResearcherID: AAF-7310-2021

FOR CITATION

Chernykh E.A. Quality of Working Life in Russian Regions. Uroven' zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii=Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2025;21(1):28-42. https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2025_21_1_2_28_42 (In Russ.)

Abstract

The study is devoted to the аnalysis of regional differences in the quality of working life. Attention to this issue will improve the working and living conditions of citizens and promote balanced socio-economic development of the country, help cope with the challenges of personnel shortage and enhance the competitiveness of regional economies. Analysis of regional differences makes it possible to develop targeted effective measures to support employment. The article provides a systematic review of publications by Russian authors devoted to measuring and assessing the quality of working life in different regions of Russia. Russian authors have not developed a unified methodology for assessing the quality of working life in the regional context; there is a mixture of macro- and micro-indicators, as well as objective and subjective measures. Among the publications of foreign authors, there is a wide range of works devoted to the assessment of this aspect in different countries (mainly European) based on the following methods: the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) System for Measuring and Assessing the Quality of Work, the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) Quality of Employment Measurement Framework, the Eurofoundation Quality of Work Indices, the Quality of Employment Index of the International Institute on Inequality, etc. The purpose of the empirical study is to analyze the differences in the main indicators of the quality of working life at the level of the federal districts of the Russian Federation. The subject of the study was the characteristics of the quality of working life: unemployment rate, the share of the poor and the share of those with precarious employment, the level of qualifications, satisfaction with various aspects of employment. The object of the study is the federal districts of Russia. The empirical base was the microdata of the Comprehensive Survey of Living Conditions of the Population from 2014 to 2022. Summary indices of job satisfaction and indices of working conditions were calculated for the federal districts. A comparison of federal districts was made based on objective indicators of the labor market: unemployment rate, proportion of low-income and precariously employed people, and the level of workers' qualifications. The main challenges of the labor market for regional labor markets and directions for solving the identified problems were formulated.

Keywords

quality of employment, quality of working life, index approach, federal districts of Russia, working conditions, wages, microdata, job satisfaction, work-related well-being

AUTHOR'S BIOGRAFY

Ekaterina A. Chernykh

PhD in Economics, Leading Research Worker of the Department of Socioeconomic Research of Living Standards and Quality of Live at the Centre of Development of Human Potential at the RAS Institute of Economics

References

1. Green F., Mostafa T. Trends in Job Quality in Europe. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union; 2012. 100 p. https://doi.org/10.2806/35164 ISBN 978-92-897-1071-8
2. Leschke J., Watt A. Challenges in Constructing a Multi-dimensional European Job Quality Index. Social Indicators Research. 2014;118(1):1-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0405-9
3. González P., Sehnbruch K., Apablaza M., et al. A Multidimensional Approach to Measuring Quality of Employment (QoE) Deprivation in Six Central American Countries. Social Indicators Research. 2021;158:107–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-021-02648-0
4. Steffgen G, Sischka P.E, Fernandez de Henestrosa M. The Quality of Work Index and the Quality of Employment Index: A Multidimensional Approach of Job Quality and Its Links to Well-Being at Work. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020;17(21),7771. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17217771
5. Zholudeva V.V., Melnichenko N.F. Statistical Evaluation of the Quality of Working Life of Employees in the Russian Federation. Statistika i Ehkonomika=Statistics and Economics. 2018;15(4):42-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.21686/2500-3925-2018-4-42-51 (In Russ.)
6. Leonidova G.V., Ivanovskaya A.L. Integral Assessment of the Quality of Working Life at the Regional Level. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta=Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University. 2020;(11(445)):50-59. http://dx.doi.org/10.47475/1994-2796-2020-11106 (In Russ.)
7. Andreeva E.L., Polkova T.V. Evaluation of the Quality of Working Life of the Population of Russian Regions. Ekonomika Regiona=Economy of Regions. 2013;(3(35)):91-100. https://doi.org/10.17059/2013-3-7 (In Russ.)
8. Zonova O.V., Nekhoda E.V. Methodological Approaches to Measuring the Quality of Employees' Working Life at a Regional Aspect. Vestnik Tomskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. Ehkonomika=Bulletin of Tomsk State University. Economics. 2019;(46):92-107. https://doi.org/10.17223/19988648/46/6 (In Russ.)
9. Mikhailov F.B., Safina L.M. Assessment of the Quality of Working Life in a Region (on the Example of the Republic of Tatarstan). Uchenye Zapiski Kazanskogo Universiteta. Seriya Gumanitarnye Nauki=Proceedings of Kazan University. Humanities Series. 2012;154(6):19-25. (In Russ.)
10. Bobkov V.N., Chernykh E.A. The Relationship of the Quality of Employment and the Quality of Work Life: A Review of Research and the Outlines of Their Development. Uroven' Zhizni Naseleniya Regionov Rossii=Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2023;19(3):361-384. https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2023_19_3_5_361_384 (In Russ.)
11. Roopali J. Work Values and the Quality of Employment: A Literature Review. New Zealand: Department of Labour; 2005. 80 p.
12. Soboleva I.V. Employment Quality and Work-Related Well-Being: Approaches to Measurement. Vestnik Instituta Ehkonomiki Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk=The Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2024;(3):7–25. https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2024_3_7_25 (In Russ.)
13. Chernykh E.A. Dynamics and Determinants of Satisfaction with the Work of Russians in the Characteristics of Human Potential. Uroven' Zhizni Naseleniya Regionsov Rossii=Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2023;19(2):199–215. https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2023_19_2_4_199_215 (In Russ.)
14. Baimurzina G.R. The Quality of Employment in the Assessments the Regional Labor Market Participants. Semioticheskiye Issledovaniya=Semiotic Studies. 2021;1(4):82-94. https://doi.org/10.18287/2782-2966-2021-1-4-82-94 (In Russ.)
15. Stuken T.Yu. The Quality of Employment of Graduates on Regional Labor Markets. Vestnik Kemerovskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. Seriya: Politicheskie, Sotsiologicheskie i Ehkonomicheskie Nauki=Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. Series: Political, Sociological and Economic Sciences. 2018;(2):33-39. https://doi.org/10.21603/2500-3372-2018-2-33-39 (In Russ.)
16. Fokin V.Ya. Territorial Differentiation of Population Occupation Quality. Diskussiya=Discussion. 2012;(10):139-142. (In Russ.)
17. Ermakova I.A., Chernopenev M.S., Konontsov A.A. Comparison of the Level of Occupational Injuries and Its Forecast in the Federal Districts of the Russian Federation. Izvestiya Tul'skogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. Nauki o Zemle. 2024;(3):209-220. (In Russ.)
18. Milyaeva L.G. Theoretical and Methodological Approaches and Methods of Complex Analysis of Quality of Working Life. Sotsial'no-trudovyye Issledovaniya=Social and Labor Research. 2019;(1(34)):6-18. (In Russ.)
19. Basova E.A., Belekhova G.V. Quality of Work Life as Estimated by Men and Women (Case Study of the Sociological Survey in the Vologda Oblast). Voprosy Territorial'nogo Razvitiya=Territorial Development Issues. 2020;8(2):1-21. https://doi.org/10.15838/tdi.2020.2.52.4 (In Russ.)
20. Popov A.V. Working Life of Russian Men During the Years of Instability (on the Materials of Large Cities and Districts of the Vologda Oblast). Sotsial'noye Prostranstvo=Social Area. 2023;9(1). https://doi.org/10.15838/sa.2023.1.37.8 (In Russ.)
21. Belekhova G.V. Work Life Quality in Pre-Retirement Ege: Regional Profile. Human Progress. 2022;8(2):5. https://doi.org/10.34709/IM.182.5 (In Russ.)
22. Antonova O.A. Methodological Approaches to Assessing the Quality of Work Life of the Employed Population of the Region. Diskussiya=Discussion. 2023;(1(116)):16-34. https://doi.org/10.46320/2077-7639-2023-1-116-16-34 (In Russ.)
23. Cazes S., Falco P., Menyhért В. Job Quality in Emerging Economies through the Lens of the OECD Job Quality Framework. In: Warhurst C., Mathieu C., Dwyer R.E. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Job Quality. UK: Oxford Handbooks; 2022. Р. 389–412. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198749790.013.18
24. Weller S., Barnes T., Kimberley N. Geographies of Job Quality. In: Warhurst C., Mathieu C., Dwyer R.E. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Job Quality. UK: Oxford Handbooks; 2022. Р. 203-219. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198749790.013.10
25. Kalleberg A.L., Fuller S., Pullman А. Job Quality in the United States and Canada. In: Warhurst C., Mathieu C., Dwyer R.E. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Job Quality. UK: Oxford Handbooks; 2022. Р. 339-362. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198749790.013.16
26. Vandenbrande T., Vandekerckhove S., Vendramin P., et al. Quality of Work and Employment in Belgium. Dublin, Ireland: Eurofound. 2013. 164 p.
27. Vets C., De Witte H., Notelaers G. Werkkenmerken en het Welzijn van Belgische Werknemers Gedurende het Laatste Decennium. Brussels: Labor and Social Dialogue; 2009. 35 p
28. Ritter J.A., Anker R. Good Jobs, Bad Jobs: Workers’ Evaluations in Five Countries. International Labour Review. 2002;141(4):331–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1564-913X.2002.tb00244.x 28
29. Leschke J., Watt A., Finn M. Putting a Number on Job Quality? Constructing a European Job Quality Index. Brussels: ETUI-REHS aisbl; 2008. 23 p. ISSN 1994-4446
30. De Bustillo R.M., Fernandez-Macias E., Antón J.I., et al. Measuring More than Money: the Social Economics of Job Quality. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing; 2011. 288 p. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849805919
31. Cazes S., Hijzen A., Saint-Martin A. Measuring and Assessing Job Quality: The OECD Job Quality Framework. OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers No. 174. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2015. 52 p. https://doi.org/10.1787/5jrp02kjw1mr-en
32. Employment and Social Policy: A Framework for Investing in Quality. European Commission. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Brussels; 2001. 313 p.
33. UNICE Position Paper on the Commission Communication Employment and Social Policies: A Framework for Investing in Quality. Union of Industrials and Employers’ Confederations of Europe (UNICE); 2001. 3 p. URL: https://www.businesseurope.eu/sites/buseur/files/media/imported/2002-03849-E.pdf (date of access: 15.12.2024).
34. Decent Work Indicators: Guidelines for Producers and Users of Statistical and Legal Framework Indicators. International Labour Office. Geneva: ILO; 2013. 257 p. ISBN 9789221280187
35. Quality of Employment Conditions and Employment Relations in Europe. Eurofound. Dublin; 2013. 66 p. 
36. Handbook on Measuring Quality of Employment: a Statistical Framework. United Nations. New York-Geneva; 2015. 320 p.

ARTICLE OF THE ISSUE

TITLE

What Demographic Policy Does Russia Need

 Yurii A. Avdeev

2.828 MB

Full text

INDEX

RAR (Research Article Report)

JEL J11, J18, P51, R23, R58

https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2025_21_1_1_12_27

AUTHOR

Yurii A. Avdeev

e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0379-9914

SPIN-code: 7481-4302

RSCI Author ID: 718435

ReseacherID: K-5937-2018

For citation

Avdeev Yu.A. What Demographic Policy Does Russia Need. Uroven' zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii=Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2025;21(1):12-27. https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2025_21_1_1_12_27 (In Russ.)

Acknowledgements

the article was prepared as part of the research work of the state assignment of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation on the topic: "Geographical and Geopolitical Factors of the Sustainable Development of Territorial Structures of the Economy and Population at Regional and Local Levels of Pacific Russia" No. 125022102815-5.

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to reveal the reasons that have prevented the sustainable demographic development of the country, and the extension of the current policy leads to a decrease in the population, and to offer an option, in case of successful implementation, to recommend for other regions. The total fertility rate for the future until 2036 does not bring to the level of simple reproduction, and the population will continue to decline. The continuation of the trend is a real threat to national security, and the shortage of labor resources hinders the development of the country's economic potential. Among the reasons are an inadequate assessment of the demographic situation, the wrong choice of priorities, and a limited set of tools for influencing the demographic behavior of the population. The object of this research is the demographic policy pursued in Russia since 2007. The subject of the analysis is the documents that determine the content of this policy, as well as the conceptual approaches underlying it. An alternative position (2005) is considered: the demographic situation of the 90s is close to disaster, and a program of decisive action is needed. The article discusses the main directions of the new demographic policy, the basis of which is the worldview position based on the laws of socio-economic development. Success will be determined by the transition from the setting of "saving" the population to its increase; recognition of the state as the main beneficiary of population growth; the consolidation by law of a provision recognizing the work of a woman in raising her children as socially useful; understanding of housing as an effective lever of demographic policy; transition to a new level of industrial development of the country, with a high level of income of the employed; changes in the spatial organization of the population's life, focused on creating conditions for population reproduction; With the understanding of migration not only as a way to overcome the shortage of labor resources, but also as a source of growth in demographic potential, the conditions for expanded reproduction. The information base of the study was publicly available statistical data from the Federal State Statistics Service (Rosstat), as well as data from published materials in various publications.

Keywords

demographic policy, total fertility rate, population growth, women's labor, housing, living space, migration, systemic approach

AUTHOR'S BIOGRAFY

Yurii A. Avdeev – PhD in Economics, Leading Researcher, Laboratory Social and Medical Geography, Pacific Geographical Institute of the Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences

References

1. Osipov G.V., Ryazantsev S.V., Levashov V.K., Rostovskaya T.K. (eds.), et al. Strategiya Proryva i Tsifrovaya Real'nost' Rossii. Sotsial'no-politicheskoe Polozhenie i Demograficheskaya Situatsiya v 2019 Godu. Monograph. Moscow: Publishing House Perspektiva; 2019. 786 p. ISBN 978-5-905790-44-7 (in Russ.)
2. Vishnevskii A.G. Izbrannye Demograficheskie Trudy in 2 vol. Vol. 1. Demograficheskaya Teoriya i Demograficheskaya Istoriya. Moscow: Publishing House Nauka; 2005. 214 p. ISBN 5-02-033776-5 (in Russ.)
3. Klupt M.A. Demographic Behavior as a Subject of Content-Analysis. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya=Sociological Studies. 2003;(12(236)):108-117. (in Russ.)
4. Ryazantsev S.V. (ed.), Arkhangelsky V.N., Bardakova L.I., et al. Demographic Development of Post-Soviet Countries (1991–2021): Trends, Demographic Policy, Prospects. Analytical Report. FCTAS RAS. Moscow: Publishing House Perspektiva; 2021. 200 p. ISBN 978-5-89697-379-9 https://doi.org/10.19181/monogr.978-5-89697-379-9.2021 (in Russ.)
5. Rybakovsky O.L., Fadeeva T.A. Depopulation in the Regions of Russia by the Beginning of 2020. Narodonaselenie=Population. 2020;23(3):119-129. https://doi.org/10.19181/population.2020.23.3.11 (in Russ.)
6. Rybakovskiy L.L., Rybakovskii O.L. Depopulation in Russia: Results for 1992–2022, Components and Compensation by Migration at the Regional Level. Sotsial'no-trudovye Issledovaniya=Social and Labor Research. 2023;2(51):16-26. https://doi.org/10.34022/2658-3712-2023-51-2-16-26 (in Russ.)
7. Rybakovsky O.L. Russian Population Reproduction: Challenges, Trends, Factors and Possible Results by 2024. Narodonaselenie=Population. 2020;23(1):53-66. https://doi.org/10.19181/population.2020.23.1.5 (in Russ.)
8. Ryazantsev S.V. (ed.), Arkhangelskiy V.N., Vorobyova O.D., et al. Demographic Situation in Russia: New Challenges and Ways of Optimization. National Demographic Report. Moscow: Publishing House Ehkon-Inform; 2019. 79 p. ISBN 978-5-907057-98-2 (in Russ.)
9. Mendeleev D.I. K Poznaniyu Rossii. Sankt-Peterburg: Publishing House A.S. Suvorin; 1906. 156 p. (in Russ.)
10. Mogilevskii K.I., Solov'ev K.A. P.A. Stolypin: Lichnost' i Reformy. 2^nd ed. revised. and add. Moscow: Publishing House ROSSPEHN; 2011. 143 p. ISBN 978-5-8243-1467-0 (in Russ.)
11. Karelova G.N., Rybakovskii L.L. (eds.) Stabilizatsiya Chislennosti Naseleniya Rossii (Vozmozhnosti i Napravleniya Demograficheskoi Politiki). Moscow: Center for Social Forecasting and Marketing; 2001. 262 p. (in Russ.)
12. Friеdman G. The Next 100 Years: A Forecast for the 21th Century. Transl. from Engl. by A. Kalinina, V. Naritsa, M. Matskovskaya. Moscow: Publishing House Ehksmo; 2010. 336 p. ISBN 978-5-699-41208-2
13. Sadovnichy V.A., Akayev A.A., Ilyin I.V., et al. Hoping for the Future: Our View of Problems, Limits and Opportunities. Istoriya i Sovremennost'. 2022;(2):109-123. https://doi.org/10.30884/iis/2022.02.05 (in Russ.)
14. Sadovnichii V.A. (ed.), et al. Preodolevaya Predely Rosta. Osnovnye Polozheniya Doklada dlya Rimskogo Kluba. Monograf. Moscow: Moscow University Press; 2023. 99 p. ISBN 978-5-19-011875-9 (in Russ.)
15. Eagleton T. Why Marx Was Right. Transl. from Engl. by P. Norvillo. Moscow: Kar'er Press. 2013. 302 p. ISBN 978-5-904946-77-7
16. Dyomina V., Tolokina Ye. Working and Free Time as Categories of Economic Theory. Vestnik MGOU. Seriya «EhkonomikA»=Bulletin of the State University of Education. Series: Economics. 2012;(4):5-8. (in Russ.)
17. Bodrunov S.D. Obshchaya Teoriya Noonomiki. Moscow: Publishing House Kul'turnaya revolyutsiya; 2019. 504 p. ISBN 978-5-00020-061-2 (in Russ.)
18. Chernykh E.A. Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences for 2023 for Having Advanced Our Understanding of Women’s Labour Market Outcomes. Uroven' Zhizni Naseleniya Regionov Rossii=Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2023;19(4):645–647. https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2023_19_4_14_645_647 (in Russ.)
19. Arkhangel’skiy V.N., Elizarov V.V., Dzhanayeva N.G. Children or Material Support: the Determination of Choice. Uroven' Zhizni Naseleniya Regionov Rossii=Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2021;17(1):102-120. https://doi.org/10.19181/lsprr.2021.17.1.8 (in Russ.)
20. Aganbegyan A.G. Predlozheniya po Sotsial'no-Ehkonomicheskomu Razvitiyu v Sovremennoi Krizisnoi Obstanovke. In: Buzgalina A.V., Kolganova A.I. (eds.), et al. Na Puti k Noonomike: Chelovek, Tekhnologii i Obshchestvo v Prostranstve Assotsiirovannogo Proizvodstva i Potrebleniya. Moscow: Institute of New Industrial Development n. a. S.Y. Vitte; 2020. P. 32-49. (in Russ.)
21. Klark G, Munen T. Global'nye Goroda i Natsional'nye Gosudarstva: Novyi Kurs na Partnerstvo v 21 Veke. Moscow: Moskovskii Urbanisticheskii Forum; 2014. 106 p. (in Russ.)
22. Avdeev Yu.A. Vladivostok Agglomeration: Problems and Options for its Development. Tikhookeanskaya Geografiya=Pacific Geography Journal. 2021;(1(5)):21-30. https://doi.org/10.35735/tig.2021.5.1.002 (in Russ.)
23. Avdeev A.Yu., Ushakova V.L. Demographic Challenges or Why the Demographic Policy of the Far East does not Lead to the Desired Result. Uroven' Zhizni Naseleniya Regionov Rossii=Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2023;19(1):9–24. https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2023_19_1_1_9_24 (in Russ.)

CHIEF EDITOR’S COLUMN

TITLE

Chief Editor's column

Vyacheslav N. Bobkov

2.828 MB

Full text

INDEX

EDI (Editorial article)

EDN LPBSZB

AUTHOR

Vyacheslav N. Bobkov

Editor-in-chief of the scientific and practical journal “Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia”, Moscow, Russia

e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

ORCID : https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7364-5297

SPIN-code:  5639-0410

RSCI Author ID:275902

ReseacherID: U-6527-2019

Scopus Author ID:  55960509800

AUTHOR BIOGRAFY

Vyacheslav N. Bobkov

Doctor of Economics, Professor, Honoured Science Worker of the Russian Federation, Chief Research Worker, Head of the Department of Socioeconomic Research of Living Standards and Quality of Live at the Centre of Development of Human Potential at the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences