SOCIOLOGICAL RESEARCH

TITLE

Internet (Non)use by People with Disabilities: Extent and Barriers to 
Internet Access

 Sofia V. Korzhuk, Aleksandra Ya. Burdyak

Размер файла645-656
Размер файла  2.828 MB Размер файла Full text

 

INDEX

RAR (Research Article Report)

JEL D63
https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2024_20_4_12_645_656

AUTHORS

Sofia V. Korzhuk

The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, Institute of Applied Economic Research, Moscow, 
Russia

e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8914-0138

SPIN-code: 9604-0340

RSCI Author ID: 896620

Scopus Author ID: 5719449371

Aleksandra Ya. Burdyak

The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, Institute of Applied Economic Research, Moscow, 
Russia

e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1134-8550

SPIN-code: 8576-6888

RSCI Author ID: 694422

Scopus Author ID: 57194382944

For citation

Korzhuk S.V., Burdyak A.Ya. Internet (Non)use by People with Disabilities: Extent and Barriers to Internet Access. Uroven' zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii=Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2024;20(4):645–656. https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2024_20_4_12_645_656 
(In Russ.)

Abstract

This article examines the involvement of the population in Internet use and the barriers they face in access to the net with a particular focus on people with disabilities, one of the most vulnerable groups. Providing basic access to the Internet for socially vulnerable groups of the population is a pressing task in the context of reducing digital inequality. The object of the study is digital inequality, the subject is the factors of digital inequality. The purpose is to study the contribution of disability, other characteristics of the individual, including place of residence, to digital inequality. The analysis is based on two Rosstat surveys data for 2022 with the sample of 153 thousand respondents. The proportion of Internet users within the general population and among people with disabilities is described, highlighting age-related differences. The study assesses barriers to Internet use controlling for age, education level, family size, type of settlement, employment status, and regional standard of living using logistic regression models. Age appears to be the most powerful predictor of Internet (non)use, older individuals are less likely to use the Internet. Education and employment status are significant factors too, affecting not only the likelihood of Internet use but also the motivation to use it and the availability of relevant skills. The digital integration of people with disabilities is significantly less than that of their peers without disabilities. All else being equal, disability reduces the likelihood of Internet use by 1.7 times. Regions with high standard of living are associated with greater digital inclusion of the population, which means that support for digitalization processes should be targeted on regions with medium or low standard of living. Lack of motivation and lack of skills are the two main barriers to overcome; both are higher for people with disabilities all else being equal.

 

Keywords

disability, people with disabilities, digitalization, digital inequality, barriers to Internet access, assistive technologies, internet accessibility, factors of digital inequality

Acknowledgments

the article was written on the basis of the RANEPA state assignment research programme

AUTHOR'S BIOGRAFY

Sofia V. Korzhuk – Candidate of Sociological Sciences, Senior Researcher, Center «Institute of Social Analysis and Prediction» IAER RANEPA

Aleksandra Ya. Burdyak – Senior Researcher, Center «Institute of Social Analysis and Prediction» IAER RANEPA

References

  1. Kalabikhina I.E. Demographic Reflections on the Digital Economy. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta =Moscow University Economic Bulletin. 2019;6:147–166 (In Russ.)
  2. Kalabikhina I., Kolotusha A. Is the Internet a health-preserving factor in Russia? Demograficheskoe obozrenie=Demographic Review. 2020;7(3):150–182. https://doi.org/10.17323/demreview.v7i3.11641 (In Russ.)
  3. Grishina E., Tsatsura E. The Effect of Caring for Older and Disabled Relatives on The Employment, Health And Economic Status Of Caregivers. Demograficheskoe obozrenie=Demographic Review. 2020;7(2):152–171. https://doi.org/10.17323/demreview.v7i2.11142 (In Russ.)
  4. Sinyavskaya O., Gorvat E. Long-Term Care for The Elderly and Disabled People: Motivations for Turning to Various Care Providers. Demographic Review. 2021;8(4):60–80. https://doi.org/10.17323/demreview.v8i4.13876 (In Russ.)
  5. Van Dijk J.A. The Deepening Divide: Inequality in the Information Society. SAGE Publications; 2005. 224 p.
  6. Korzhuk S.V., Skachkova G.S. Disability. Scientific and educational portal "Great Russian Encyclopedia". 2023; 10. https://doi.org/10.54972/00000001_2023_10_30
  7. Dimaggio P., Hargittai E., Celeste C., et al. Digital Inequality: From Unequal Access to Differentiated Use. Social Inequality. Russell Sage Foundation; 2004. 355–400.
  8. Goggin G. Disability and Digital Inequalities. Rethinking Digital Divides with Disability Theory. Theorizing Digital Divides. London: Routledge; 2017. 63–75.
  9. Wilson E.J. The Information Revolution and Developing Countries. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press; 2004. 456 p.
  10. Ragnedda M. The Third Digital Divide: A Weberian Approach to Digital Inequalities. NY: Routledge; 2017. 127 p.
  11. Jaeger P.T. Assessing Section 508 Compliance on Federal E-Government Web Sites: A Multi-Method, User-Centered Evaluation of Accessibility for Persons with Disabilities. Government Information Quarterly. 2006;23(2):169–190.
  12. Tsatsou P. Is Digital Inclusion Fighting Disability Stigma? Opportunities, Barriers, And Recommendations. Disability & Society. 2020;36(5):702–729. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2020.1749563
  13.  Vicente M.R., López A.J. Multidimensional Analysis of the Disability Digital Divide: Some Evidence for Internet Use. The Information Society. 2010:26(1):48–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/01615440903423245
  14. Dobransky K., Hargittai E. Unrealized Potential: Exploring the Digital Disability Divide. Poetics. 2016;(58):18–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2016.08.003
  15. Kolybashkina N., Sukhova A., Ustinova M., et al. Barriers and Opportunities to Employment for Persons with Disabilities in the Russian Federation. World Bank Group; 2021. 180 p. URL: https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099335011302129130/pdf/P175164082c1900f10b0d300c9326d7e3c8.pdf (access date: 25.03.2024) (In Russ.)
  16. . Tsatsou P. Digital Inclusion of People with Disabilities: A Qualitative Study of Intra-Disability Diversity in The Digital Realm. Behaviour & Information Technology. 2019;39(5):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2019.1636136
  17.  Scanlan M. Reassessing the Disability Divide: Unequal Access as The World Is Pushed Online. Universal Access in the Information Society. 2022;(21):725–735. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-021-00803-5
  18. Disability And the Social Status of Disabled People in Russia. Ed. by T. M. Maleva. Moscow: Publishing House Delo RANEPA; 2017. 256 p. ISBN 978-5-7749-1213-1 (In Russ.)
  19. Korzhuk S.V. The Social Exclusion of People with Disabilities: The Reproduction of Imparity. Monitoring Obshchestvennogo Mneniya: Ekonomicheskie I Sotsial'nye Peremeny=Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes. 2016;(3):134–146. https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2016.3.07 (In Russ.)

SOCIOLOGICAL RESEARCH

TITLE

Social Well-being of Residents of Russian Regions 
as a Factor in the Migration Potential of the Local Population

 Rim M. Valiakhmetov, Marsel' S. Turakayev

Размер файла629-644
Размер файла  2.828 MB Размер файла Full text

 

INDEX

RAR (Research Article Report)

JEL R23
https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2024_20_4_11_629_644

AUTHORS

Rim M. Valiakhmetov

Ufa University of Science and Technology, Ufa, Russia

e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8875-5197

SPIN-code: 1540-7293

RSCI Author ID: 573596

ReseacherID: P-1733-2017

Scopus Author ID: 55488425100

Marsel' S. Turakayev

Ufa University of Science and Technology, Ufa, Russia

Institute of Sociology – Branch of the Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, 
Russia

e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2449-6605

SPIN-код: 3532-1314

РИНЦ Author ID: 1014366

ReseacherID: AAU-9402-2020

Scopus Author ID: 57567724000

For citation

Valiakhmetov R.M., Turakayev M.S. Social Well-being of Residents of Russian Regions as a Factor in the Migration Potential of the 
Local Population. Uroven' zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii=Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2024;20(4):629–644. 
https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2024_20_4_11_629_644 (In Russ.)

Abstract

This article examines the impact of a set of indicators of social well-being of the population of the Republic of Bashkortostan, Sverdlovsk oblast, Kursk oblast, Vologda oblast and Tyumen oblast on the migration potential of residents of these Russian regions. The data from a Russian study (late 2023 - early 2024) in the above-mentioned regions of the Russian Federation, carried out within the framework of the "Sociocultural Portraits of Russian Regions" program. The Bashkortostan part of the field study was conducted by the authors of this article. Based on the analysis of the data obtained, it was confirmed that both objective and subjective factors influence the migration attitudes of the population. The infrastructural and institutional features of the development of the social space of the region, are expressed in the presence or absence of high-quality jobs, the degree of development of social services, public transport, educational and medical institutions, landscaping, the state of the environment, etc. Subjective factors are manifested in the respondents' assessments and their attitude not only to the region of their residence, but also to the place of their current work, the conditions and opportunities for realizing their claims to "new" employment, professional self-realization and a decent level of wages. The thesis that respondents who want to earn "well" and "a lot" have a relatively high migration potential was confirmed. It was found that representatives of the not very mobile but low-income group of the population are also inclined to change their region of residence, especially those families whose financial situation has worsened over the past year. It was also revealed that social capital, i.e. the level of trust in people, as well as state and public institutions, is equally important for the population, regardless of their place of residence and work.

 

Keywords

social space of the region, socio-cultural portrait of the region, sociocultural diversity, social well-being, standard of living, migration potential, social capital, confidence in the future

AUTHORS BIOGRAFY

Rim M. Valiakhmetov – PhD in Sociology, Head of the Scientific Laboratory of Social and Demographic Research, Professor of the Department of Sociology and Youth Work, Ufa University of Science and Technology

 

Marcel’ S. Turakaev – PhD in Sociology, Senior Lecturer of the Department of Sociology and Youth Work, Сhief Specialist of the Scientific Laboratory of Social and Demographic Research, Ufa University of Science and Technology; Senior Researcher, Laboratory for Regional Studies of Quality of Life of the Centre of Russian Regions Research, Institute of Sociology – Branch of the Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences

References

  1. Lapin N.I., Belyaeva L.A. Program and Standard Toolkit “Sociocultural portrait of a region of Russia” (Modification – 2010); Russian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Philosophy. Moscow: IFRAS; 2010. 111 p. (In Russ.)
  2. Lapin N.I. (ed.), Belyaeva L. A. (ed.), et al. Problems of socio-cultural modernization of regions of Russia: [monograph]. Russian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Center for the Study of Socio-Cultural Changes. Moscow: Academia; 2013. 415 p. (In Russ.)
  3. Lapin N.I. (ed.), Belyaeva L.A., Boyko I.I., et al. Atlas of modernization of Russia and its regions: Socioeconomic and sociocultural trends and problems: monograph. Moscow: LLC Publishing House "Ves Mir"; 2016. 360 p. ISBN 978-5-7777-0664-5 (In Russ.)
  4. Belyaeva L.A. Social Distances as A Feature of The Contemporary Russian Social Space. Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Sotsiologiya=RUDN Journal of Sociology. 2018;18(1):58–72. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2272-2018-18-1-58-72 (In Russ.)
  5. Andrianova E.V., Belyaeva L.A., Davydenko V.A., etc. Sociocultural evolution of Russia: 30 years of research. Moscow: LLC Publishing House "Ves Mir"; 2022. 190 p. ISBN 978-5-7777-0876-2 (In Russ.)
  6. Shabunova A.A. Social and Cultural Portrait of The Region in The Context of Changes During 2008–2010. Ekonomicheskiye i sotsial'nyye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz=Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast. 2012;(1(19)):65–75 (In Russ.)
  7. Andrianova E.V., Davydenko V.A., Danilova E.P., et al. Sociocultural portrait of the Tyumen region: Collective monograph. Tyumen: Tyumen State University; 2011. 356 p. ISBN 978-5-400-00542-8 (In Russ.)
  8. Kogai E.A., Pasovets Yu.M., Kogai A.A., Yatskova D.S. Kursk region on the sociocultural map of Russia. Kursk: MUP "Kursk City printing house"; 2015. 236 p. ISBN 978-5-8386-0227-5 (In Russ.)
  9. Valiakhmetov R.M., Khilazheva G.F., Allayarov A.M., et al. Sociocultural portrait of the Republic of Bashkortostan. Ufa: Publishing House "Gilem"; 2013. 228 p. ISBN 978-5-88185-135-4 (In Russ.)
  10. Anufrieva E.V., Dulina N.V., Efimov E.G., et al. Sociocultural portrait of the region. Volgograd: Volgograd State Technical University; 2013. 159 p. ISBN 978-5-9948-1255-6 (In Russ.)
  11. Kargapolova E.V., Aryasova A.Yu., Grechkina T.Yu., et al. Sociocultural portrait of the Astrakhan region: an experience of sociological, economic and political analysis: monograph. Ministry of Education and Science of the Astrakhan Region, Astrakhan Civil Engineering Institute. Volgograd: LLC "Volgograd Scientific Publishing House"; 2010. 306 p. ISBN 978-5-98461-813-7 (In Russ.)
  12. Plotnikova E.B., Markova Yu.S. Social construction of the life worlds of the population of municipalities in a risky socio-cultural environment. Sociocultural evolution of Russia: 30 years of research. Moscow: LLC Publishing House "Ves Mir"; 2022: 69–88. 190 p. ISBN 978-5-7777-0876-2 (In Russ.)
  13. Gruzdeva M.A. Socio-cultural perspective of regional development: Experience of long-term observations. Sotsial'noye prostranstvo=Social Area. 2022;8(2). https://doi.org/10.15838/sa.2022.2.34.7 (In Russ.)
  14. Gorshkov M.K., Petukhov V.V., Andreev A.L., et al. Twenty-Five Years of Russian Transformations: Experience of Sociologicalanalysi. Moscow: LLC Publishing House "Ves Mir"; 2018. 384 p. ISBN 978-5-7777-0722-2 (In Russ.)
  15. Epikhina Yu.B., Chernysh M.F., Sushko P.E., Shilova V.A., Lysukho A.S. Subjective and objective well-being in modern Russian society: results of an empirical study. Information and analytical bulletin of the Institute of Sociology of the Federal Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2020. No. 1. 95 p. https://doi.org/10.19181/INAB.2020.1 (In Russ.)
  16. Rodionov E.A., Shulgina L.V., Krupko A.E. Economic security and economic well-being: Correspondence of categories. FES: Finansy. Ekonomika. Strategiya=FES: Finance. Economy. Strategy. 2023;20(5):38–43. (In Russ.)
  17. Kitieva M.I., Merzhoyeva L.I. Competitiveness of The Country as A Factor of Economic Well-Being. Colloquium-Journal. 2019;(18-6(42)):64–65. (In Russ.)
  18. Hashchenko V.A. The Structure of The Subjective Economic Wellbeing Depending on Its Level. Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal=Psychological Journal. 2008;29(6):26–38. (In Russ.)
  19. Radaev V.V. Millennials Compared to Previous Generations: An Empirical Analysis. Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya=Sociological Research. 2018;(3(407)):15–33. https://doi.org/7868/S0132162518030029 (In Russ.)
  20. Avdeev E.A., Allardt E., Belyaeva L.A., et al. Sotsiologicheskie Podkhody K Izucheniyu Sotsial'nogo Blagopoluchiya. Moscow: Federal Research Sociological Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences; 2021. 431 p. ISBN 978-5-89697-377-5 https://doi.org/10.19181/monogr.978-5-89697-377-5.2021 (In Russ.)
  21. Rybakovskiy L.L. Background of the Theory of Three Stages of the Migration Process. Uroven' zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii= Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2018;(2(208)):86–94. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/124411/1999-9836-2018-10018
  22. Ryazantsev S.V., Pismennaya E.E., Khramova M.N. Formation of The Migration Potential of Compatriots in The Countries of Central Asia. Narodonaseleniye=Population. 2015;(4(70)):58–67. (In Russ.)
  23. Denisenko M.B., Mukomel V.I. Labor Migration in Russia During the Coronavirus Pandemic. Demograficheskoye obozreniye=Demographic Review. 2020;7(3):84–107. https://doi.org/10.17323/demreview.v7i3.11637 (In Russ.)
  24. Waite L.J. Social well-being and health in the older population: Moving beyond social relationships. Future Directions for the Demography of Aging: Proceedings of a Workshop. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2018:99–130. https://doi.org/17226/25064
  25. Moliner L., Alegre F., Cabedo-Mas A., Chiva-Bartoll O. Social well-being at school: Development and validation of a scale for primary education students. Frontiers in Education. 2021;(6):1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.800248
  26. Valiakhmetov R.M., Turakayev M.S. Migration Potential of The Population of The Republic. Nauchnyy rezul'tat. Sotsiologiya i upravleniye=Research Result. Sociology and Management. 2020;6(4):69–86. https://doi.org/10.18413/2408-9338-2020-6-4-0-5 (In Russ.)
  27. Turakayev M.S. The Level of Education and Cultural Capital as Migration Factors (Based on People Living in the Republic of Bashkortostan). Sotsiologicheskaya nauka i sotsial'naya praktika=The Journal Sociological Science and Social Practice. 2019;7(4(28)):119–127. https://doi.org/10.19181/snsp.2019.7.4.6805 (In Russ.)
  28. Rybakovsky L.L. Migration Potential: Criteria of Assessment and Present-Day Size. Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya=Sociological Research. 2011;(4(324)):24–34. (In Russ.)
  29. Zamyatina N.Yu., Yashunsky A.D. Migration from The North: Social Networks and Mental "Proximity". Non-Economic factors of spatial development: Collection of articles, Pushkin (Tsarskoe Selo), June 4–8, 2014. Institute of Geography of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Pushkin (Tsarskoe Selo): Individual Entrepreneur Matushkina I.I.; 2015: 147–173. (In Russ.)

 

DEMOGRAPHIC RESEARCH

TITLE

 Demographic Trends in Rural Areas of the Russian Federation

Mehdehgma Ts. Budazhanaeva 

Размер файла612-628
Размер файла  2.828 MB Размер файла Full text

 

INDEX

RAR (Research Article Report)

JEL J11
https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2024_20_4_10_612_628

AUTHOR

Mehdehgma Ts. Budazhanaeva 

Federal Research Center of Agrarian Economy and Social Development of Rural Areas - All-Russian Research Institute of Agricultural Economics, Moscow, Russia

e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0700-586X

SPIN-code: 7480-9266

RCSI Author ID: 775884

For citation

Medegma B.Ts. Demographic Trends in Rural Areas of the Russian Federation. Uroven' zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii=Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2024;20(4):612–628. https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2024_20_4_10_612_628 (In Russ.)

Annotation

The state policy of rural development of the Russian Federation is aimed at maintaining the rural population. The rural population is characterized by negative natural growth, which is partially offset by population growth as a result of administrative and territorial transformations and migration. Since 2019, there has been an acceleration in the decline in the rural population as a result of migration and natural processes. The long outflow and high mortality of the rural population led to the deformation of its age structure. The purpose of this work is to identify the prevailing demographic trends in rural areas, including taking into account the spatial heterogeneity of the age structure of the population and demographic processes. The methodological basis of the study was based on methods of demographic analysis and forecasting, cartographic method, statistical grouping, scenario approach. The information basis of the study was the information published by Rosstat as part of the official statistical accounting of the number and movement of the population by gender, age and subjects of the Russian Federation. The subjects of the Russian Federation differ in age structure and type of reproduction of the rural population. The subjects of the Russian Federation are heterogeneous in terms of the level and structure of mortality of the rural population for various reasons. The high mortality rate of the rural population is due to demographic aging, the socio-economic well-being of the territory, and the availability of medical care. There is a migration outflow of the female population of reproductive age. The combination of demographic processes has led to a significant deformation of the age structure of the rural population of the subjects of the Russian Federation. To quantify the degree of deformation of the age structure, the deviation of the median age from the average age is calculated.

 

Keywords

demographic processes, rural areas, rural population, fertility, mortality, demographic forecast, migration, age structure deformation

AUTHOR'S BIOGRAFY

Medegma Ts. Budazhanaeva – PhD in Economics, Leading Researcher, Federal Research Center for Agrarian Economics and Social Development of Rural Territories - All-Russian Research Institute of Agricultural Economics

References

 

  1. Bondarenko L.V., Arkhangel'skii V.N. Demographic situation in rural areas: assessment and prospects. Ehkonomika, trud, upravlenie v sel'skom khozyaistve. 2023;10(104):164-176. https://doi.org/10.33938/2310-164 (In Russ.)
  2. Vishnevskii A.G. Demograficheskaya situatsiya v Rossii: dolgovremennye tendentsii. Conference Proceeding; October 22-24, 2020; Voronezh, Russia. Voronezh: Tsifrovaya poligrafiya. 2020:29-36. (In Russ.)
  3. Rybakovskii O.L., Fadeeva T.A. Structural Demographic Waves of Russian Regions: Preliminary Analysiss. Uroven' zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii=Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2022;18(4):425-438. https://doi.org/10.19181/lsprr.2022.18.4.1 (In Russ.)
  4. Rybakovskii L.L., Fadeeva T.A. Regional Dynamics of the Birth Rate of the Russian Population in the Second Fifteen Years of the 21st Century. Uroven' zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii=Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2024;20(2):271-281. https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2024_20_2_10_271_281 (In Russ.)
  5. Pruel N.A., Lipatova L.N., Gradusova V.N. Migration in Modern Russia: Scope, Main Directions and Problems. Regionology=Russian Journal of Regional Studies. 2020;28(1):133-158. https://doi.org/10.15507/2413-1407.110.028.202001.133-158 (In Russ.)
  6. Belozerov V.S., Shchitova N.A., Solov'ev I.A. Demographic Situation in the North Caucasian Federal District. Innovatsii. Tekhnologii. 2021;4:77-97. https://doi.org/10.37493/2308-4758.2021.4.5 EDN YCPWKL (In Russ.)
  7. Skinner M., Winterton R., Walsh K. (е). Rural Gerontology: Towards Critical Perspectives on Rural Ageing. London: Routledge; 2020. 394 р. ISBN 9781003019435; https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003019435
  8. Clark S., Brooks M.M., Helou A., et al. Are Rural Areas Holdouts in the Second Demographic Transition? Evidence From Canada and the United States. 2024;61(2):541–568. https://doi.org/10.1215/00703370-11237867
  9. Choudhury S., Majumdar S.K. Examining the Socio-Economic and Demographic differentials in Rural Out-Migration and Employment Status of Migrant Workers in India. Demography India. 2024;53(1):12-30.
  10. Zhen L., Liu S., Haoran J., et al. Rural population change in China: Spatial differences, driving forces and policy implication. Journal of Rural Studies. 2017;51(7):189-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.02.006
  11. Vandeskrik K. Demograficheskii analiz. Moscow: Akademicheskii proekt; 2005. 241 p. ISBN 5-8291-0500-4 (In Russ.)
  12. Mkrtchyan N.V. Migration in rural areas of Russia: territorial differences. Population and Economics. 2019;3(1):39-51. https://doi.org/10.3897/popecon.3.e34780
  13. Sekitski-Pavlenko О.О. Typology of the Transformation of the Age Structure in Russian Regions. Ekonomika regiona=Economy of Regions. 2023;19(3):813-827. https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2023-3-15 (In Russ.)
  14. Mkrtchyan N.V. Problems in the Statistics of Internal Russian Migration Caused by the Changes in Accounting Methods in 2011. Demograficheskoe obozrenie=Demographic Review. 2020;7(1):83-99. EDN ZLDEXI (In Russ.)
  15. Rybakovsky O.L. The age structure of the population of the regions of Russia at the beginning of the 21st century: components of the formation. Narodonaselenie=Population. 2023;26(1):4-15. https://doi.org/10.19181/population.2023.26.1.1 (In Russ.)
  16. Meister M., Peters J.C., Rossen A. Welcome back! The impact of ‘return initiatives’ on return migration to rural regions. Journal of Economic Geography. 2024;24(5):759-784. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbae028
  17. Ryazantsev S.V., Bragin A.D. Migration in rural areas of ethnonational regions of the Russian Federation: trends and consequences. Urbanistika= 2023;(4):62-77. DOI: 10.7256/2310-8673.2023.4.69059 (In Russ.)

 

DEMOGRAPHIC RESEARCH

TITLE

The Eurasian Path of Demographic Development in Russia as a Challenge to the Global Liberal Model of Demographic Transition

Vladimir A. Iontsev, Yuliya A. Uzkaya

Размер файла597-611
Размер файла  2.828 MB Размер файла Full text

 

INDEX

RAR (Research Article Report)

JEL J11
https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2024_20_4_9_597_611

AUTHORS

Vladimir A. Iontsev

Higher School of Modern Social Sciences Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia

e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9461-3542

SPIN-code: 3115-0697

RSCI Author ID: 72295

Yuliya A. Uzkaya

Higher School of Modern Social Sciences Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia

ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0001-5473-1197

SPIN-code: 5056-0800

RSCI Author ID: 718355

For citation

Iontsev V.A., Uzkaya Yu.A. The Eurasian Path of Demographic Development in Russia as a Challenge to the Global Liberal Model of Demographic Transition.  Uroven' zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii=Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2024;20(4):597–611. https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2024_20_4_9_597_611 (In Russ.)

Abstract

The article deals with one of the most important issues of the demographic future of Russia. Russia is facing an acute issue of choosing the path of demographic development. And considering that for more than thirty years Russia has actually been following the modern Western path of demographic development, the basic model of which is the globally liberal model of demographic transition, the question arises: to what extent does this path take into account Russia's national interests? In our opinion, this path of demographic development leads to a dead end, leads, in fact, to the disappearance of the Russian population. And how can it be otherwise if the main model of a family is a family with one child, or without one at all. This model is well described in the concept of the second demographic transition. Based on the latter, the idea of the Eurasian path of demographic development appeared. The article reveals in sufficient detail the ideas of Eurasianism, modern neo-Eurasianism, while, according to some Russian scientists, the idea of a new Eurasianism can be considered as a national idea that would contribute to the unity and rise of sovereign Russia in "conditions of harsh cultural and civilizational expansion of the West." The paper proves that only by following the Eurasian path of demographic development, Russia will be able to successfully get out of a difficult demographic situation, which is characterized by the concept of "demographic crisis", a characteristic and significant feature of which are negative qualitative demographic changes. Especially such kind of tendencies we can observe among young people. The article briefly reveals the role of international migration, which can contribute to overcoming a difficult demographic situation, provided that a competent migration policy is carried out. This policy should take into account not only the interests of big capital, but also the interests of the Russian population and the regional interests of Russia. Among the migrants arriving in Russia, the most significant group, both demographically and economically, may be Old Believers living mainly in the far abroad. And in the conclusion of the article, proposals are made to improve the current demographic situation in Russia. The results of the study can be used in the process of improving demographic and migration policies conducted in Russia.

 

Keywords

Eurasianism, neo-Eurasianism, the Eurasian way of demographic development, the globally liberal model of demographic transition, the concept of the second demographic transition, demographic crisis, depopulation, traditional demographic values, international migration

AUTHORS BIOGRAFY

Vladimir A. Iontsev - Doctor of Economics, emeritus professor of Lomonosov Moscow State University, Head of the Department of Demography, Higher School of Modern Social Sciences Lomonosov Moscow State University

Yuliya A. Uzkaya – PhD in Economics, Associate Professor of the Department of Demography, Deputy Director for Academic Affairs, Higher School of Modern Social Sciences Lomonosov Moscow State University

References

  1. Klupt M.A. Teoriya Demograficheskogo Razvitiya. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost'=Social Sciences and Contemporary World. 2005;(2):139-149. (In Russ.)
  2. Rostovskaya T.K., Sitkovskii A.M. Demographic development resources: On the unification of concepts in demographic research. Ekonomicheskie i social'nye peremeny: fakty, tendencii, prognoz=Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast. 2024;17(1):178–200. https://doi.org/10.15838/esc.2024.1.91.10 (In Russ.)
  3. Averin A.N. Gosudarstvennoe Regulirovanie Demograficheskih i Migracionnyh Processov v Rossijskoj Federacii. Moscow: Prospekt. 2022. 128 p. ISBN 978-5-392-36591-3 (In Russ.)
  4. Uzkaya Y.A. Mezhdunarodnaya Migraciya Naseleniya v Teorii i Koncepciyah Demograficheskogo Perekhoda. Moscow: MAKS Press. 2018. 288 p. ISBN 978-5-317-06004-6 (In Russ.)
  5. Vishnevskii A.G. Demograficheskij Krizis v Rossii. June 2009. IFRI. Centr Rossiya-NNG. 31 p. (In Russ.)
  6. Vishnevskii A.G. Serp i Rubl': Konservativnaya Modernizaciya v SSSR. Moscow: Izdatel'skii dom Vysshei shkoly ehkonomiki. 2010. 430 p. ISBN 978-5-7598-0760-5 (In Russ.)
  7. Iontsev V.A., Aleshkovskii I.A. Demograficheskij Faktor v Razvitii Sovremennoj Rossii. In Demograficheskie perspektivy Rossii; Ed. by G.V. Osipov, S.V. Ryazantsev. Moscow: Ekon-Inform. 2008. 906 p. (In Russ.)
  8. Demograficheskij Enciklopedicheskij Slovar'. Ed. by D.I. Valentei. Moscow: Sovetskaya ehntsiklopediya. 1985. 608 p. (In Russ.)
  9. Sovremennaya Demografiya. Ed. by A.Ya. Kvashi, V.A. Iontseva. Moscow: Izdatel'stvo Moskovskogo universiteta. 1995. 246 p. (In Russ.)
  10. Ryazantsev S.V. (ex. ed.), Rostovskaya T.K., et al. Demographic well-being of Russia. National demographic report. FNISC RAS. Moscow: ITD Perspektiva. 2022. 108 p. ISBN 978-5-88045-557-7 https://doi.org/10.19181/monogr.978-5-88045-557-7.2022 (In Russ.)
  11. Rybal'chenko S.I. (ex. ed.), Korotaev A.V., Efremov I.A., et al. Demografiya 2030. Kak Obespechit' Ustojchivyj Rost Naseleniya Rossijskoj Federacii. Special'nyj Doklad Obshchestvennoj Palaty Rossijskoj Federacii. OPRF. Moscow: Pacholi Konsalting, 2023. 86 ISBN 978-5-6050462-0-2 (In Russ.)
  12. Gosudarstvennaya Politika Vyvoda Rossii iz Demograficheskogo Krizisa. Ed. by S.S. Sulakshina. Iss. 2. Moscow: Ehkonomika. 2007. 888 p. ISBN 978-5-91290-007-5 (In Russ.)
  13. Demograficheskaya Enciklopediya. Ed. by A.A. Tkachenko. Moscow: Enciklopediya. 2013. 944 p. ISBN 978-5-94802-051-8 (In Russ.)
  14. Korolenko A.V. Investigation of the modern demographic crisis in Russia: approaches and estimates. Voprosy territorial'nogo razvitiya=Territorial development issues. 2014;(10(20)):1-14. (In Russ.)
  15. RBK. Moscow: Izdatel'skii dom RBK. 2020;(1-2). (In Russ.)
  16. Coleman D. Immigration and ethnic change in low-fertility countries: a third demographic transition. Population and Development Review. 2006;32(3);401-446
  17. Vishnevsky A. Herbert Spencer: the unrecognized father of the theory of demographic transition Demograficheskoe obozrenie=Demographic Review. 2019;6(1):6-31. https://doi.org/10.17323/demreview.v6i1.9110 (In Russ.)
  18. Notestein F.W. Population – the long In Food for the World; Ed. by T. Schultz. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 1945:37-57.
  19. Vishnevsky A.G. Demographic revolution changes the reproductive change of the Homo sapiens species. Demograficheskoe obozrenie=Demographic Review. 2014;1(1):6-33. (In Russ.)
  20. Lesthaeghe R., Kaa D. J. van de. Twee Demografische Transities? In Bevolking Groei en Krimp. Deventer. 1986:9-24.
  21. Van de Kaa D.J. Europe’s Second Demographic Transition. Population Bulletin. Washington: The Population Reference Bureau. 1987;42(1):1-59.
  22. Lesthaeghe R. The Second Demographic Transition in Western Countries: An Interpretation. In K. Oppenheim Mason et A-M. Jensen, Editors, Gender and Family Change in Industrialized Countries. Oxford, 1995: Clarendon.
  23. B'yukenen P. Smert' Zapada. Moscow: AST, Terra Fantastica. 2004. 444 p. (In Russ.)
  24. Strugatskii A.N., Strugatskii B.N. Hishchnye Veshchi Veka: [Fantasticheskii Roman]. Moscow: AST, 2016. 224 p. (In Russ.)
  25. Demin V.N. Tainy Evrazii. Seriya: Slavyane i Rus. Moscow: Veche. 2012. 368 p. ISBN 978-5-9533-6006-7 (In Russ.)
  26. Gumilev L.N. Ritmy Evrazii: Epohi i Civilizacii. Moscow: Progress: Firma Pangeya. 1993. 575 p. ISBN 5-88621-004-0 (In Russ.)
  27. Orlik I.I. Evrazijskaya Ideya: Vozniknovenie i Evolyuciya. Vestnik RUDN. Seriya: Vseobshchaya istoriya= RUDN JOURNAL OF WORLD HISTORY. 2010;(4). (In Russ.)
  28. Gumilev L.N. Tri Glavnyh Proizvedeniya o Evrazii: Ot Rusi k Rossii. Drevnie tyurki. Tysyacheletie Vokrug Kaspiya. Moscow: Eksmo. 2024. 992 p. ISBN 978-5-04-173333-9 (In Russ.)
  29. Petrovskii V., Titarenko M. O neoevraziiskoi identichnosti Rossii. Mezhdunarodnaya zhizn'=International Affairs. 2016;(4). (In Russ.)
  30. Lomonosov M.V. O Sohranenii i Razmnozhenii Rossijskogo Naroda. In Izbrannye proizvedeniya v 2 t. Vol. 2. Istoriya. Filologiya. Poehziya. Moscow: Nauka. 1986:130-144. (In Russ.)
  31. Kuzyk B.N., Titarenko M.L. Kitai – Rossiya 2050: Strategiya Sorazvitiya. Moscow: Institute of Economic Strategies. 2006. 656 с. ISBN 5-93618-095-6 (In Russ.)
  32. Iontsev V., Prokhorova Y. To the issue of international migration and nuptiality within the concept of the fourth demographic transition. In Scientific Series International Migration of Population: Russia and the Contemporary World; Ed. by V. Iontsev. 2014;28:78-85.
  33. Iontsev V.A. Evraziiskii put' demograficheskogo razvitiya Rossii i ee regionov kak odin iz global'nykh vyzovov. In III Mezhdunarodnyi demograficheskii forum Demografiya i global'nye vyzovy. Tom 1. Plenarnoe zasedanie. Sektsiya 1; Ed. by N.V. Yakovenko. Voronezh: Tsifrovaya poligrafiya. 2024:97-107. (In Russ.)
  34. Rybakovskii L.L., Fadeeva T.A. Regional Dynamics of the Birth Rate of the Russian Population in the Second Fifteen Years of the 21st Century. Uroven' zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii=Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2024;20(2):271-281. https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2024_20_2_10_271_281 (In Russ.)
  35. Berdyaev N.A. Russkaya Ideya. Moscow: Eksmo. 2024. 384 p. ISBN 978-5-04-182101-2 (In Russ.)
  36. Vishnevskii A.G. Demograficheskaya Revolyuciya. Moscow: Statistika. 1977. 240 p. (In Russ.)
  37. World Population Prospects 2022. United Nations. 52 p. ISBN 9789210014380 https://doi.org/10.18356/9789210014380

ECONOMICAL RESEARCH

TITLE

Regional Instruments for Program-Based Management in the Social Sphere in the Context of Poverty Reduction

 Ol'ga V. Selivanova, Vladimir M. Smirnov, Tamara R. Novikova

Размер файла585-596
Размер файла  2.828 MB Размер файла Full text

 

INDEX

RAR (Research Article Report)

JEL I32, I38
https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2024_20_4_8_585_596

AUTHORS

Ol'ga V. Selivanova

All-Russian Research Institute of Labor of the Ministry of Labor and Social Protection of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia

e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9628-409X

SPIN-code: 1935-0274

RSCI Author ID: 1084111

ResearcherID: AID-4501-2022

Vladimir M. Smirnov

Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia 

e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

ORCID: http:orcid.org/0000-0002-5587-3495

SPIN-code: 9981-8404

RSCI Author ID: 638489

Tamara R. Novikova

Scientific and Research Financial Institute, Moscow, Russia 

e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

SPIN-code: 2002-1367

RSCI Author ID: 729349

For citation

Selivanova O.V., Smirnov V.M., Novikova T.R. Regional Instruments for Program-Based Management in the Social Sphere in the Context 
of Poverty Reduction. Uroven' zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii=Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2024;20(4):585–596. https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2024_20_4_8_585_596 (In Russ.) 

Abstract

The article explores the theoretical, methodological, and methodical aspects of evaluating program-based instruments of public administration within the constituent entities of the Russian Federation. Various approaches to determining the effectiveness of public administration and its mechanisms in a historical context are analyzed.  The purpose of the study is to analyze the experience with program-based management in the social sector in terms of implementing regional programs to reduce poverty in the regions of Russia. The focus of the research is on regional poverty reduction programs and their implementation. During the monitoring of 42 regional poverty reduction programs that have been approved, based on data from the Federal State Statistics Service (Rosstat) and other relevant sources, a structural assessment of the programs was conducted, and the most prevalent challenges associated with their implementation were identified. Measures that have had the greatest impact on reducing absolute poverty in regions of the Russian Federation have been identified. Recommendations for improving regional programs have been proposed, including measures aimed at enhancing the incomes of working populations, such as increasing wages for public sector employees who are not “covered” by presidential decrees, and assisting vulnerable workers in improving their professional skills to promote wage growth. In order to enhance the current social assistance system, it is proposed that the criteria for the provision of regional maternity capital be reviewed, and the scope of financial assistance measures for families at risk of poverty be expanded. Particular attention should be paid to the principle of customer-centeredness in the provision of public services by employment agencies.

Keywords

poverty, effectiveness evaluation, regional programs, program-target management, social assistance, social policy, poor families, effective employment, monitoring

AUTHORS BIOGRAFY

Olga V.Selivanova – PhD in Economics, Senior Researcher at the Center for Social Policy Research of the All-Russian Research Institute of Labor of the Ministry of Labor and Social Protection of the Russian Federation, Russia, Moscow

Vladimir M. Smirnov – Doctor of Economics, Professor, Department of Economic Security and Risk Management, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Russia, Moscow

Tamara R. Novikova – Researcher at the Center for Accounting Methodology of the Scientific Research Financial Institute of the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation, Russia, Moscow

 

References

  1. Khachaturov T.S. Ehffektivnost' kapital'nykh vlozhenii. Moscow: Ehkonomika; 1979. 335 p. (In Russ.)
  2. Rastvorceva S. N. (ex. ed.), et al. Sotsial'no-ehkonomicheskaya ehffektivnost' regional'nogo razvitiya. Moscow: Ekon-Inform, 2011. 131 p. ISBN 978-5-9506-0691-5 (In Russ.)
  3. 3. Atamanchuk G.V. Teoriya gosudarstvennogo upravleniya: lecture course. Moscow: Omega-L, 2009. 579 p. (In Russ.)
  4. Anikina I.D., Bukhantsev YU.A., Kuz'mina EH.V. Analiz napravlenii razvitiya kontrolya i otsenki ehffektivnosti realizatsii gosprogramm i natsproektov. Fundamental'nye issledovaniya. 2022;(10-1);7-13. https://doi.org/10.17513/fr.43335 (In Russ.)
  5. Belanova N.N. Otsenka ehffektivnosti gosudarstvennykh programm: klyuchevye indikatory i pokazateli. Ehkonomika, predprinimatel'stvo i pravo. 2020;10(3);487-502 (In Russ.)
  6. Ul'yanov A.YU. Problemy otsenki ehffektivnosti strategicheskogo planirovaniya v Rossiiskoi Federatsii. Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2023;(6);12-20 (In Russ.)
  7. Andreeva E.I., Bychkov D.G., Feoktistova O.A. Regional'nyi reiting ehffektivnosti sotsial'noi podderzhki nuzhdayushchikhsya. Problemy prognozirovaniya. 2022;(1(190));55-64 (In Russ.)
  8. Bobkov V.N., Gulyugina A.A., Odintsova E.V. O riskakh v sfere urovnya zhizni naseleniya Rossii, vozmozhnostyakh i resheniyakh po ikh snizheniyu. Living Standards of The Population in The Regions of Russia. 2024;20(1);59-75. https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2024_20_1_6_59_75 (In Russ.)
  9. Razumov A.A., Selivanova O.V. Vliyanie detskikh posobii i kompensatsionnykh vyplat na snizhenie urovnya bednosti v regionakh RF. Sotsial'no-trudovye issledovaniya. 2023;(1(50);83-93 (In Russ.)
  10. Kheine P. Ehkonomicheskii obraz myshleniya. Moscow: Delo; 1993. 704 p. (In Russ.)
  11. Alkin M. C., Vo A. T., Christie C. A. Evaluation essentials: From A to Z. – Guilford Publications, 2024. 334 p.
  12.  Artem'eva S.S., Buyanova E.A. Programmno-tselevoe byudzhetirovanie v sub"ektakh Rossiiskoi Federatsii. Vektor ehkonomiki. 2020;(3(45));31 (In Russ.)
  13. Yuzvovich L.I., L'vova M.I. Problemy finansirovaniya sotsial'no orientirovannykh programm na urovne regiona. Ehkonomika, predprinimatel'stvo i pravo. 2022;12(11);2985-3006. (In Russ.)
  14. Smirnov V.M., Selivanova O.V. Sovershenstvovanie otsenki regional'nykh programm bor'by s bednost'yu. Samoupravlenie. 2021;(2(124));481-487 (In Russ.)
  15. Masterov A.I., Mikhina E.V. Problemy i puti sovershenstvovaniya otsenki ehffektivnosti gosudarstvennykh programm v rossiiskikh regionakh. Sotsial'nye i ehkonomicheskie sistemy. 2023;(1-1(39));254-265 (In Russ.)
  16. White J. Playing the Wrong PART: The Program Assessment Rating Tool and the Functions of the President's Budget. Public Administration Review. 2011;(72):112-121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02484.x
  17. Moynihan D. P., Lavertu S. Does Involvement in Performance Management Routines Encourage Performance Information Use? Evaluating GPRA and PART. Public Administration Review. 2012;(72):592–602. URL: http://faculty.cbpp.uaa.alaska.edu/afgjp/PADM628%20Spring%202013/Evaluating%20GPRA%20and%20PART.pdf (access 11/09/2024).
  18. Kasdin S., McCann A. What Drives Program Terminations for the Federal Government? Public Budgeting & Finance. 2021;(42). https://doi.org/10.1111/pbaf.12288
  19. Shmigol' N.S. Povyshenie ehffektivnosti programmnogo byudzhetirovaniya s uchetom luchshikh zarubezhnykh praktik. Ehkonomika. Nalogi. Pravo. 2017;10(5);114-125 (In Russ.)
  20. Weiss C.H. Theory‐based evaluation: Past, present, and future. New directions for evaluation. 1997;(76);41-55.
  21. King J. Expanding theory-based evaluation: Incorporating value creation in a theory of change. Evaluation and Program Planning. 2021;89;101963. ISSN 0149-7189, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2021.101963
  22. Sergeeva S.A. Povyshenie ehffektivnosti strategicheskogo planirovaniya: primenenie kontseptsii «teorii izmenenii». Ehkonomika: vchera, segodnya, zavtra=Economics: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow. 2022;12(5A);383-390. https://doi.org/10.34670/AR.2022.86.84.033 (In Russ.)
  23. Vashalomidze E.V., Chalenko I.A. Innovatsionnye mekhanizmy sotsial'noi zashchity naseleniya na osnove povysheniya ehffektivnosti vzaimodeistviya organov publichnoi vlasti i biznesa. Moscow: Direkt-media, 2023. 144 p. ISBN 978-5-4499-3665-3 (In Russ.)
  24. Grishina E.E. Material'noe polozhenie mnogodetnykh semei i faktory rosta ikh dokhodov. Finansovyi zhurnal. 2024;16(1);45-60 (In Russ.)
  25. Ovchinnikov V.N. Nobelevskaya premiya po ehkonomike 2019 goda: bor'ba s bednost'yu i ehksperimenty v ehkonomike razvitiya. FinansovyĬ zhurnal. 2020;12(2);120–131. (In Russ.)
  26. Stroev P.V., Pivovarova O.V., Sheozhev KH.V. et al. Regiony s nizkoi finansovoi ustoichivost'yu: analiz i aktivizatsiya razvitiya. Finansovyj zhurnal. 2023. T. 15, № 1. P. 26-44 (In Russ.)
  27. Platygin D.N., Smirnov V.M., Novikov P.N. Teoretiko-metodologicheskie aspekty organizatsii i provedeniya monitoringov v sotsial'no-ehkonomicheskoi sfere. Sotsial'no-trudovye issledovaniya. 2022;(3(48));8-17 (In Russ.)