DEMOGRAPHIC RESEARCH

TITLE

 Demographic Trends in Rural Areas of the Russian Federation

Mehdehgma Ts. Budazhanaeva 

612-628

2.828 MB

Full text

INDEX

RAR (Research Article Report)

JEL J11
https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2024_20_4_10_612_628

AUTHOR

Mehdehgma Ts. Budazhanaeva 

Federal Research Center of Agrarian Economy and Social Development of Rural Areas - All-Russian Research Institute of Agricultural Economics, Moscow, Russia

e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0700-586X

SPIN-code: 7480-9266

RCSI Author ID: 775884

For citation

Medegma B.Ts. Demographic Trends in Rural Areas of the Russian Federation. Uroven' zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii=Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2024;20(4):612–628. https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2024_20_4_10_612_628 (In Russ.)

Annotation

The state policy of rural development of the Russian Federation is aimed at maintaining the rural population. The rural population is characterized by negative natural growth, which is partially offset by population growth as a result of administrative and territorial transformations and migration. Since 2019, there has been an acceleration in the decline in the rural population as a result of migration and natural processes. The long outflow and high mortality of the rural population led to the deformation of its age structure. The purpose of this work is to identify the prevailing demographic trends in rural areas, including taking into account the spatial heterogeneity of the age structure of the population and demographic processes. The methodological basis of the study was based on methods of demographic analysis and forecasting, cartographic method, statistical grouping, scenario approach. The information basis of the study was the information published by Rosstat as part of the official statistical accounting of the number and movement of the population by gender, age and subjects of the Russian Federation. The subjects of the Russian Federation differ in age structure and type of reproduction of the rural population. The subjects of the Russian Federation are heterogeneous in terms of the level and structure of mortality of the rural population for various reasons. The high mortality rate of the rural population is due to demographic aging, the socio-economic well-being of the territory, and the availability of medical care. There is a migration outflow of the female population of reproductive age. The combination of demographic processes has led to a significant deformation of the age structure of the rural population of the subjects of the Russian Federation. To quantify the degree of deformation of the age structure, the deviation of the median age from the average age is calculated.

Keywords

demographic processes, rural areas, rural population, fertility, mortality, demographic forecast, migration, age structure deformation

AUTHOR'S BIOGRAFY

Medegma Ts. Budazhanaeva – PhD in Economics, Leading Researcher, Federal Research Center for Agrarian Economics and Social Development of Rural Territories - All-Russian Research Institute of Agricultural Economics

References

1. Bondarenko L.V., Arkhangel'skii V.N. Demographic situation in rural areas: assessment and prospects. Ehkonomika, trud, upravlenie v sel'skom khozyaistve. 2023;10(104):164-176. https://doi.org/10.33938/2310-164 (In Russ.)
2. Vishnevskii A.G. Demograficheskaya situatsiya v Rossii: dolgovremennye tendentsii. Conference Proceeding; October 22-24, 2020; Voronezh, Russia. Voronezh: Tsifrovaya poligrafiya. 2020:29-36. (In Russ.)
3. Rybakovskii O.L., Fadeeva T.A. Structural Demographic Waves of Russian Regions: Preliminary Analysiss. Uroven' zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii=Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2022;18(4):425-438. https://doi.org/10.19181/lsprr.2022.18.4.1 (In Russ.)
4. Rybakovskii L.L., Fadeeva T.A. Regional Dynamics of the Birth Rate of the Russian Population in the Second Fifteen Years of the 21st Century. Uroven' zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii=Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2024;20(2):271-281. https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2024_20_2_10_271_281 (In Russ.)
5. Pruel N.A., Lipatova L.N., Gradusova V.N. Migration in Modern Russia: Scope, Main Directions and Problems. Regionology=Russian Journal of Regional Studies. 2020;28(1):133-158. https://doi.org/10.15507/2413-1407.110.028.202001.133-158 (In Russ.)
6. Belozerov V.S., Shchitova N.A., Solov'ev I.A. Demographic Situation in the North Caucasian Federal District. Innovatsii. Tekhnologii. 2021;4:77-97. https://doi.org/10.37493/2308-4758.2021.4.5 EDN YCPWKL (In Russ.)
7. Skinner M., Winterton R., Walsh K. (е). Rural Gerontology: Towards Critical Perspectives on Rural Ageing. London: Routledge; 2020. 394 р. ISBN 9781003019435; https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003019435
8. Clark S., Brooks M.M., Helou A., et al. Are Rural Areas Holdouts in the Second Demographic Transition? Evidence From Canada and the United States. 2024;61(2):541–568. https://doi.org/10.1215/00703370-11237867
9. Choudhury S., Majumdar S.K. Examining the Socio-Economic and Demographic differentials in Rural Out-Migration and Employment Status of Migrant Workers in India. Demography India. 2024;53(1):12-30.
10. Zhen L., Liu S., Haoran J., et al. Rural population change in China: Spatial differences, driving forces and policy implication. Journal of Rural Studies. 2017;51(7):189-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.02.006
11. Vandeskrik K. Demograficheskii analiz. Moscow: Akademicheskii proekt; 2005. 241 p. ISBN 5-8291-0500-4 (In Russ.)
12. Mkrtchyan N.V. Migration in rural areas of Russia: territorial differences. Population and Economics. 2019;3(1):39-51. https://doi.org/10.3897/popecon.3.e34780
13. Sekitski-Pavlenko О.О. Typology of the Transformation of the Age Structure in Russian Regions. Ekonomika regiona=Economy of Regions. 2023;19(3):813-827. https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2023-3-15 (In Russ.)
14. Mkrtchyan N.V. Problems in the Statistics of Internal Russian Migration Caused by the Changes in Accounting Methods in 2011. Demograficheskoe obozrenie=Demographic Review. 2020;7(1):83-99. EDN ZLDEXI (In Russ.)
15. Rybakovsky O.L. The age structure of the population of the regions of Russia at the beginning of the 21st century: components of the formation. Narodonaselenie=Population. 2023;26(1):4-15. https://doi.org/10.19181/population.2023.26.1.1 (In Russ.)
16. Meister M., Peters J.C., Rossen A. Welcome back! The impact of ‘return initiatives’ on return migration to rural regions. Journal of Economic Geography. 2024;24(5):759-784. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbae028
17. Ryazantsev S.V., Bragin A.D. Migration in rural areas of ethnonational regions of the Russian Federation: trends and consequences. Urbanistika= 2023;(4):62-77. DOI: 10.7256/2310-8673.2023.4.69059 (In Russ.)

DEMOGRAPHIC RESEARCH

TITLE

The Eurasian Path of Demographic Development in Russia as a Challenge to the Global Liberal Model of Demographic Transition

Vladimir A. Iontsev, Yuliya A. Uzkaya

597-611

2.828 MB

Full text

INDEX

RAR (Research Article Report)

JEL J11
https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2024_20_4_9_597_611

AUTHORS

Vladimir A. Iontsev

Higher School of Modern Social Sciences Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia

e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9461-3542

SPIN-code: 3115-0697

RSCI Author ID: 72295

Yuliya A. Uzkaya

Higher School of Modern Social Sciences Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia

ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0001-5473-1197

SPIN-code: 5056-0800

RSCI Author ID: 718355

For citation

Iontsev V.A., Uzkaya Yu.A. The Eurasian Path of Demographic Development in Russia as a Challenge to the Global Liberal Model of Demographic Transition.  Uroven' zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii=Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2024;20(4):597–611. https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2024_20_4_9_597_611 (In Russ.)

Abstract

The article deals with one of the most important issues of the demographic future of Russia. Russia is facing an acute issue of choosing the path of demographic development. And considering that for more than thirty years Russia has actually been following the modern Western path of demographic development, the basic model of which is the globally liberal model of demographic transition, the question arises: to what extent does this path take into account Russia's national interests? In our opinion, this path of demographic development leads to a dead end, leads, in fact, to the disappearance of the Russian population. And how can it be otherwise if the main model of a family is a family with one child, or without one at all. This model is well described in the concept of the second demographic transition. Based on the latter, the idea of the Eurasian path of demographic development appeared. The article reveals in sufficient detail the ideas of Eurasianism, modern neo-Eurasianism, while, according to some Russian scientists, the idea of a new Eurasianism can be considered as a national idea that would contribute to the unity and rise of sovereign Russia in "conditions of harsh cultural and civilizational expansion of the West." The paper proves that only by following the Eurasian path of demographic development, Russia will be able to successfully get out of a difficult demographic situation, which is characterized by the concept of "demographic crisis", a characteristic and significant feature of which are negative qualitative demographic changes. Especially such kind of tendencies we can observe among young people. The article briefly reveals the role of international migration, which can contribute to overcoming a difficult demographic situation, provided that a competent migration policy is carried out. This policy should take into account not only the interests of big capital, but also the interests of the Russian population and the regional interests of Russia. Among the migrants arriving in Russia, the most significant group, both demographically and economically, may be Old Believers living mainly in the far abroad. And in the conclusion of the article, proposals are made to improve the current demographic situation in Russia. The results of the study can be used in the process of improving demographic and migration policies conducted in Russia.

Keywords

Eurasianism, neo-Eurasianism, the Eurasian way of demographic development, the globally liberal model of demographic transition, the concept of the second demographic transition, demographic crisis, depopulation, traditional demographic values, international migration

AUTHORS BIOGRAFY

Vladimir A. Iontsev - Doctor of Economics, emeritus professor of Lomonosov Moscow State University, Head of the Department of Demography, Higher School of Modern Social Sciences Lomonosov Moscow State University

Yuliya A. Uzkaya – PhD in Economics, Associate Professor of the Department of Demography, Deputy Director for Academic Affairs, Higher School of Modern Social Sciences Lomonosov Moscow State University

References

1. Klupt M.A. Teoriya Demograficheskogo Razvitiya. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost'=Social Sciences and Contemporary World. 2005;(2):139-149. (In Russ.)
2. Rostovskaya T.K., Sitkovskii A.M. Demographic development resources: On the unification of concepts in demographic research. Ekonomicheskie i social'nye peremeny: fakty, tendencii, prognoz=Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast. 2024;17(1):178–200. https://doi.org/10.15838/esc.2024.1.91.10 (In Russ.)
3. Averin A.N. Gosudarstvennoe Regulirovanie Demograficheskih i Migracionnyh Processov v Rossijskoj Federacii. Moscow: Prospekt. 2022. 128 p. ISBN 978-5-392-36591-3 (In Russ.)
4. Uzkaya Y.A. Mezhdunarodnaya Migraciya Naseleniya v Teorii i Koncepciyah Demograficheskogo Perekhoda. Moscow: MAKS Press. 2018. 288 p. ISBN 978-5-317-06004-6 (In Russ.)
5. Vishnevskii A.G. Demograficheskij Krizis v Rossii. June 2009. IFRI. Centr Rossiya-NNG. 31 p. (In Russ.)
6. Vishnevskii A.G. Serp i Rubl': Konservativnaya Modernizaciya v SSSR. Moscow: Izdatel'skii dom Vysshei shkoly ehkonomiki. 2010. 430 p. ISBN 978-5-7598-0760-5 (In Russ.)
7. Iontsev V.A., Aleshkovskii I.A. Demograficheskij Faktor v Razvitii Sovremennoj Rossii. In Demograficheskie perspektivy Rossii; Ed. by G.V. Osipov, S.V. Ryazantsev. Moscow: Ekon-Inform. 2008. 906 p. (In Russ.)
8. Demograficheskij Enciklopedicheskij Slovar'. Ed. by D.I. Valentei. Moscow: Sovetskaya ehntsiklopediya. 1985. 608 p. (In Russ.)
9. Sovremennaya Demografiya. Ed. by A.Ya. Kvashi, V.A. Iontseva. Moscow: Izdatel'stvo Moskovskogo universiteta. 1995. 246 p. (In Russ.)
10. Ryazantsev S.V. (ex. ed.), Rostovskaya T.K., et al. Demographic well-being of Russia. National demographic report. FNISC RAS. Moscow: ITD Perspektiva. 2022. 108 p. ISBN 978-5-88045-557-7 https://doi.org/10.19181/monogr.978-5-88045-557-7.2022 (In Russ.)
11. Rybal'chenko S.I. (ex. ed.), Korotaev A.V., Efremov I.A., et al. Demografiya 2030. Kak Obespechit' Ustojchivyj Rost Naseleniya Rossijskoj Federacii. Special'nyj Doklad Obshchestvennoj Palaty Rossijskoj Federacii. OPRF. Moscow: Pacholi Konsalting, 2023. 86 ISBN 978-5-6050462-0-2 (In Russ.)
12. Gosudarstvennaya Politika Vyvoda Rossii iz Demograficheskogo Krizisa. Ed. by S.S. Sulakshina. Iss. 2. Moscow: Ehkonomika. 2007. 888 p. ISBN 978-5-91290-007-5 (In Russ.)
13. Demograficheskaya Enciklopediya. Ed. by A.A. Tkachenko. Moscow: Enciklopediya. 2013. 944 p. ISBN 978-5-94802-051-8 (In Russ.)
14. Korolenko A.V. Investigation of the modern demographic crisis in Russia: approaches and estimates. Voprosy territorial'nogo razvitiya=Territorial development issues. 2014;(10(20)):1-14. (In Russ.)
15. RBK. Moscow: Izdatel'skii dom RBK. 2020;(1-2). (In Russ.)
16. Coleman D. Immigration and ethnic change in low-fertility countries: a third demographic transition. Population and Development Review. 2006;32(3);401-446
17. Vishnevsky A. Herbert Spencer: the unrecognized father of the theory of demographic transition Demograficheskoe obozrenie=Demographic Review. 2019;6(1):6-31. https://doi.org/10.17323/demreview.v6i1.9110 (In Russ.)
18. Notestein F.W. Population – the long In Food for the World; Ed. by T. Schultz. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 1945:37-57.
19. Vishnevsky A.G. Demographic revolution changes the reproductive change of the Homo sapiens species. Demograficheskoe obozrenie=Demographic Review. 2014;1(1):6-33. (In Russ.)
20. Lesthaeghe R., Kaa D. J. van de. Twee Demografische Transities? In Bevolking Groei en Krimp. Deventer. 1986:9-24.
21. Van de Kaa D.J. Europe’s Second Demographic Transition. Population Bulletin. Washington: The Population Reference Bureau. 1987;42(1):1-59.
22. Lesthaeghe R. The Second Demographic Transition in Western Countries: An Interpretation. In K. Oppenheim Mason et A-M. Jensen, Editors, Gender and Family Change in Industrialized Countries. Oxford, 1995: Clarendon.
23. B'yukenen P. Smert' Zapada. Moscow: AST, Terra Fantastica. 2004. 444 p. (In Russ.)
24. Strugatskii A.N., Strugatskii B.N. Hishchnye Veshchi Veka: [Fantasticheskii Roman]. Moscow: AST, 2016. 224 p. (In Russ.)
25. Demin V.N. Tainy Evrazii. Seriya: Slavyane i Rus. Moscow: Veche. 2012. 368 p. ISBN 978-5-9533-6006-7 (In Russ.)
26. Gumilev L.N. Ritmy Evrazii: Epohi i Civilizacii. Moscow: Progress: Firma Pangeya. 1993. 575 p. ISBN 5-88621-004-0 (In Russ.)
27. Orlik I.I. Evrazijskaya Ideya: Vozniknovenie i Evolyuciya. Vestnik RUDN. Seriya: Vseobshchaya istoriya= RUDN JOURNAL OF WORLD HISTORY. 2010;(4). (In Russ.)
28. Gumilev L.N. Tri Glavnyh Proizvedeniya o Evrazii: Ot Rusi k Rossii. Drevnie tyurki. Tysyacheletie Vokrug Kaspiya. Moscow: Eksmo. 2024. 992 p. ISBN 978-5-04-173333-9 (In Russ.)
29. Petrovskii V., Titarenko M. O neoevraziiskoi identichnosti Rossii. Mezhdunarodnaya zhizn'=International Affairs. 2016;(4). (In Russ.)
30. Lomonosov M.V. O Sohranenii i Razmnozhenii Rossijskogo Naroda. In Izbrannye proizvedeniya v 2 t. Vol. 2. Istoriya. Filologiya. Poehziya. Moscow: Nauka. 1986:130-144. (In Russ.)
31. Kuzyk B.N., Titarenko M.L. Kitai – Rossiya 2050: Strategiya Sorazvitiya. Moscow: Institute of Economic Strategies. 2006. 656 с. ISBN 5-93618-095-6 (In Russ.)
32. Iontsev V., Prokhorova Y. To the issue of international migration and nuptiality within the concept of the fourth demographic transition. In Scientific Series International Migration of Population: Russia and the Contemporary World; Ed. by V. Iontsev. 2014;28:78-85.
33. Iontsev V.A. Evraziiskii put' demograficheskogo razvitiya Rossii i ee regionov kak odin iz global'nykh vyzovov. In III Mezhdunarodnyi demograficheskii forum Demografiya i global'nye vyzovy. Tom 1. Plenarnoe zasedanie. Sektsiya 1; Ed. by N.V. Yakovenko. Voronezh: Tsifrovaya poligrafiya. 2024:97-107. (In Russ.)
34. Rybakovskii L.L., Fadeeva T.A. Regional Dynamics of the Birth Rate of the Russian Population in the Second Fifteen Years of the 21st Century. Uroven' zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii=Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2024;20(2):271-281. https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2024_20_2_10_271_281 (In Russ.)
35. Berdyaev N.A. Russkaya Ideya. Moscow: Eksmo. 2024. 384 p. ISBN 978-5-04-182101-2 (In Russ.)
36. Vishnevskii A.G. Demograficheskaya Revolyuciya. Moscow: Statistika. 1977. 240 p. (In Russ.)
37. World Population Prospects 2022. United Nations. 52 p. ISBN 9789210014380 https://doi.org/10.18356/9789210014380

ECONOMICAL RESEARCH

TITLE

Regional Instruments for Program-Based Management in the Social Sphere in the Context of Poverty Reduction

 Ol'ga V. Selivanova, Vladimir M. Smirnov, Tamara R. Novikova

585-596

2.828 MB

Full text

INDEX

RAR (Research Article Report)

JEL I32, I38
https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2024_20_4_8_585_596

AUTHORS

Ol'ga V. Selivanova

All-Russian Research Institute of Labor of the Ministry of Labor and Social Protection of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia

e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9628-409X

SPIN-code: 1935-0274

RSCI Author ID: 1084111

ResearcherID: AID-4501-2022

Vladimir M. Smirnov

Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia 

e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

ORCID: http:orcid.org/0000-0002-5587-3495

SPIN-code: 9981-8404

RSCI Author ID: 638489

Tamara R. Novikova

Scientific and Research Financial Institute, Moscow, Russia 

e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

SPIN-code: 2002-1367

RSCI Author ID: 729349

For citation

Selivanova O.V., Smirnov V.M., Novikova T.R. Regional Instruments for Program-Based Management in the Social Sphere in the Context 
of Poverty Reduction. Uroven' zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii=Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2024;20(4):585–596. https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2024_20_4_8_585_596 (In Russ.) 

Abstract

The article explores the theoretical, methodological, and methodical aspects of evaluating program-based instruments of public administration within the constituent entities of the Russian Federation. Various approaches to determining the effectiveness of public administration and its mechanisms in a historical context are analyzed.  The purpose of the study is to analyze the experience with program-based management in the social sector in terms of implementing regional programs to reduce poverty in the regions of Russia. The focus of the research is on regional poverty reduction programs and their implementation. During the monitoring of 42 regional poverty reduction programs that have been approved, based on data from the Federal State Statistics Service (Rosstat) and other relevant sources, a structural assessment of the programs was conducted, and the most prevalent challenges associated with their implementation were identified. Measures that have had the greatest impact on reducing absolute poverty in regions of the Russian Federation have been identified. Recommendations for improving regional programs have been proposed, including measures aimed at enhancing the incomes of working populations, such as increasing wages for public sector employees who are not “covered” by presidential decrees, and assisting vulnerable workers in improving their professional skills to promote wage growth. In order to enhance the current social assistance system, it is proposed that the criteria for the provision of regional maternity capital be reviewed, and the scope of financial assistance measures for families at risk of poverty be expanded. Particular attention should be paid to the principle of customer-centeredness in the provision of public services by employment agencies.

Keywords

poverty, effectiveness evaluation, regional programs, program-target management, social assistance, social policy, poor families, effective employment, monitoring

AUTHORS BIOGRAFY

Olga V.Selivanova – PhD in Economics, Senior Researcher at the Center for Social Policy Research of the All-Russian Research Institute of Labor of the Ministry of Labor and Social Protection of the Russian Federation, Russia, Moscow

Vladimir M. Smirnov – Doctor of Economics, Professor, Department of Economic Security and Risk Management, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Russia, Moscow

Tamara R. Novikova – Researcher at the Center for Accounting Methodology of the Scientific Research Financial Institute of the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation, Russia, Moscow

References

1. Khachaturov T.S. Ehffektivnost' kapital'nykh vlozhenii. Moscow: Ehkonomika; 1979. 335 p. (In Russ.)
2. Rastvorceva S. N. (ex. ed.), et al. Sotsial'no-ehkonomicheskaya ehffektivnost' regional'nogo razvitiya. Moscow: Ekon-Inform, 2011. 131 p. ISBN 978-5-9506-0691-5 (In Russ.)
3. 3. Atamanchuk G.V. Teoriya gosudarstvennogo upravleniya: lecture course. Moscow: Omega-L, 2009. 579 p. (In Russ.)
4. Anikina I.D., Bukhantsev YU.A., Kuz'mina EH.V. Analiz napravlenii razvitiya kontrolya i otsenki ehffektivnosti realizatsii gosprogramm i natsproektov. Fundamental'nye issledovaniya. 2022;(10-1);7-13. https://doi.org/10.17513/fr.43335 (In Russ.)
5. Belanova N.N. Otsenka ehffektivnosti gosudarstvennykh programm: klyuchevye indikatory i pokazateli. Ehkonomika, predprinimatel'stvo i pravo. 2020;10(3);487-502 (In Russ.)
6. Ul'yanov A.YU. Problemy otsenki ehffektivnosti strategicheskogo planirovaniya v Rossiiskoi Federatsii. Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2023;(6);12-20 (In Russ.)
7. Andreeva E.I., Bychkov D.G., Feoktistova O.A. Regional'nyi reiting ehffektivnosti sotsial'noi podderzhki nuzhdayushchikhsya. Problemy prognozirovaniya. 2022;(1(190));55-64 (In Russ.)
8. Bobkov V.N., Gulyugina A.A., Odintsova E.V. O riskakh v sfere urovnya zhizni naseleniya Rossii, vozmozhnostyakh i resheniyakh po ikh snizheniyu. Living Standards of The Population in The Regions of Russia. 2024;20(1);59-75. https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2024_20_1_6_59_75 (In Russ.)
9. Razumov A.A., Selivanova O.V. Vliyanie detskikh posobii i kompensatsionnykh vyplat na snizhenie urovnya bednosti v regionakh RF. Sotsial'no-trudovye issledovaniya. 2023;(1(50);83-93 (In Russ.)
10. Kheine P. Ehkonomicheskii obraz myshleniya. Moscow: Delo; 1993. 704 p. (In Russ.)
11. Alkin M. C., Vo A. T., Christie C. A. Evaluation essentials: From A to Z. – Guilford Publications, 2024. 334 p.
12.  Artem'eva S.S., Buyanova E.A. Programmno-tselevoe byudzhetirovanie v sub"ektakh Rossiiskoi Federatsii. Vektor ehkonomiki. 2020;(3(45));31 (In Russ.)
13. Yuzvovich L.I., L'vova M.I. Problemy finansirovaniya sotsial'no orientirovannykh programm na urovne regiona. Ehkonomika, predprinimatel'stvo i pravo. 2022;12(11);2985-3006. (In Russ.)
14. Smirnov V.M., Selivanova O.V. Sovershenstvovanie otsenki regional'nykh programm bor'by s bednost'yu. Samoupravlenie. 2021;(2(124));481-487 (In Russ.)
15. Masterov A.I., Mikhina E.V. Problemy i puti sovershenstvovaniya otsenki ehffektivnosti gosudarstvennykh programm v rossiiskikh regionakh. Sotsial'nye i ehkonomicheskie sistemy. 2023;(1-1(39));254-265 (In Russ.)
16. White J. Playing the Wrong PART: The Program Assessment Rating Tool and the Functions of the President's Budget. Public Administration Review. 2011;(72):112-121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02484.x
17. Moynihan D. P., Lavertu S. Does Involvement in Performance Management Routines Encourage Performance Information Use? Evaluating GPRA and PART. Public Administration Review. 2012;(72):592–602. URL: http://faculty.cbpp.uaa.alaska.edu/afgjp/PADM628%20Spring%202013/Evaluating%20GPRA%20and%20PART.pdf (access 11/09/2024).
18. Kasdin S., McCann A. What Drives Program Terminations for the Federal Government? Public Budgeting & Finance. 2021;(42). https://doi.org/10.1111/pbaf.12288
19. Shmigol' N.S. Povyshenie ehffektivnosti programmnogo byudzhetirovaniya s uchetom luchshikh zarubezhnykh praktik. Ehkonomika. Nalogi. Pravo. 2017;10(5);114-125 (In Russ.)
20. Weiss C.H. Theory‐based evaluation: Past, present, and future. New directions for evaluation. 1997;(76);41-55.
21. King J. Expanding theory-based evaluation: Incorporating value creation in a theory of change. Evaluation and Program Planning. 2021;89;101963. ISSN 0149-7189, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2021.101963
22. Sergeeva S.A. Povyshenie ehffektivnosti strategicheskogo planirovaniya: primenenie kontseptsii «teorii izmenenii». Ehkonomika: vchera, segodnya, zavtra=Economics: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow. 2022;12(5A);383-390. https://doi.org/10.34670/AR.2022.86.84.033 (In Russ.)
23. Vashalomidze E.V., Chalenko I.A. Innovatsionnye mekhanizmy sotsial'noi zashchity naseleniya na osnove povysheniya ehffektivnosti vzaimodeistviya organov publichnoi vlasti i biznesa. Moscow: Direkt-media, 2023. 144 p. ISBN 978-5-4499-3665-3 (In Russ.)
24. Grishina E.E. Material'noe polozhenie mnogodetnykh semei i faktory rosta ikh dokhodov. Finansovyi zhurnal. 2024;16(1);45-60 (In Russ.)
25. Ovchinnikov V.N. Nobelevskaya premiya po ehkonomike 2019 goda: bor'ba s bednost'yu i ehksperimenty v ehkonomike razvitiya. FinansovyĬ zhurnal. 2020;12(2);120–131. (In Russ.)
26. Stroev P.V., Pivovarova O.V., Sheozhev KH.V. et al. Regiony s nizkoi finansovoi ustoichivost'yu: analiz i aktivizatsiya razvitiya. Finansovyj zhurnal. 2023. T. 15, № 1. P. 26-44 (In Russ.)
27. Platygin D.N., Smirnov V.M., Novikov P.N. Teoretiko-metodologicheskie aspekty organizatsii i provedeniya monitoringov v sotsial'no-ehkonomicheskoi sfere. Sotsial'no-trudovye issledovaniya. 2022;(3(48));8-17 (In Russ.)

ECONOMICAL RESEARCH

TITLE

Patient Dissatisfaction in Public and Private Healthcare Organizations: the Influence of Individual Characteristics

 Ol'ga A. Kislitsyna

571-584

2.828 MB

Full text

INDEX

RAR (Research Article Report)

JEL I10, I11
https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2024_20_4_7_571_584

AUTHOR

Ol'ga A. Kislitsyna

Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia

e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4144-237X
SPIN-code: 7120-4122
RSCI Author ID: 76704
ResearcherID: E-3767-2012
Scopus Author ID: 8852460000 15

For citation

Kislitsyna O.A. Social Patient Dissatisfaction in Public and Private Healthcare Organizations: the Influence of Individual Characteristics.  Uroven' zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii=Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2024;20(4):571–584. https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2024_20_4_7_571_584 (In Russ.)

Abstract

Consumer satisfaction/dissatisfaction is becoming a key indicator of the quality of medical services and the effectiveness of health systems. The purpose of this study was to examine the level of dissatisfaction with received medical care and the individual factors associated with it among patients in public and private health care institutions.

The information base of the study was a Sample observation of the health status of the population conducted by Rosstat in 2023 and covered a total of just over 120 thousand respondents, of which participants over 18 years of age who used health services during the past 12 months (about 90 thousand) were selected for further analysis. Patient dissatisfaction was considered as a dependent variable in multivariate logistic regressions. Socio-demographical and economical characteristics of the survey participants, their health characteristics and place of residence were used as independent variables.

It was found that a significant proportion of patients were satisfied with the medical care they received, while the level of dissatisfaction was higher in public health organizations (21.8%) than in private ones (7.6%). Women, older respondents, those who were married and/or had children under 18, who have received secondary or higher education, were employed in the private sector of the economy or had their own business, had poor health and complains about poor financial situation, lived in the city and in such Federal Districts as Siberian, Far Eastern, Southern, Northwestern, Volga, were more likely to express dissatisfaction with the medical care received in public health organizations. While dissatisfaction with services in private institutions was associated with only five factors: age, health, financial situation, type of settlement and district of residence. The reasons for dissatisfaction with medical services in public and private health organizations were compared. Population groups dissatisfied with medical care for specific reasons were identified.

Keywords 

satisfaction, public opinion, medical services, medical healthcare, determining factors, public health organizations, private health organizations, Sample observation of the health status of the population

AUTHOR'S BIOGRAFY

Kislitsyna A. Ol'ga – D-r of Econ., Principle investigator of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences

References

1. Bleich S.N., Özaltin E., Murray C.J.L. How does satisfaction with healthcare system relate to patient experience? Bull World Health Organ. 2009;87(4):271– https://doi.org/10.2471/blt.07.050401
2. Blendon R.J., Leitman R., Morrison I., et al. Satisfaction with health systems in ten nations. Health Aff (Millwood). 1990;9(2):185–192. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.9.2.185
3. Kang L., Zhang T., Xian B., et al. Public satisfaction with health system after healthcare reform in China. Health Res Policy Syst. 2023;21(2):128. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-023-01067-6
4. Hekkert K.D., Cihangir S., Kleefstra S.M., et al. Patient satisfaction revisited: a multilevel approach. Soc Sci Med. 2009;69(1):68–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.04.016
5. Hall J.A., Milburn M.A., Epstein A.M. A causal model of health status and satisfaction with medical care. Med Care. 1993;31(1):84–94. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-199301000-00007
6. Sadovoy M.A., Kobyakova O.S., Deev I.A., et al. Satisfaction with the quality of medical care: “you can’t please everyone” or “the patient is always right”? Byulleten' sibirskoj mediciny=Bulletin of Siberian Medicine. 2017;16(1):152–161. https://doi.org/10.20538/1682-0363-2017-1-152-161 (In Russ.)
7. Kharitonov S.V., Lyamina N.P., Zaitsev V.P. Factors in the formation of patient satisfaction with medical care. Klinicheskaya medicina=Clinical medicine. 2020;98(2):98–105 (In Russ.)
8. Tyufilin D.S., Chigrina V.P., Medvedev V.A., et al. Satisfaction with medical care in the Russian Federation: factors influencing the assessment. Menedzher zdravoohraneniya=Healthcare manager. 2023;8:68–80. (In Russ.)
9. Menshikova L.I., Dyachkova M.G., Vyazmin A.M., et al. Satisfaction of patients of the Arkhangelsk region with primary health care. Social'nye aspekty zdorov'ya naseleniya=Social aspects of population health. 2013;33(5):5. (In Russ.)
10. Sitzia J. How valid and reliable are patient satisfaction data? An analysis of 195 studies. Int J Qual Health Care. 1999;11(4):319–328. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/11.4.319
11. Deshpande S.P., Deshpande S.S. Factors influencing consumer satisfaction with health care. Health Care Manag (Frederick). 2014;33(3):261–26 https://doi.org/10.1097/HCM.0000000000000024
12. Hanson K., Gilson L., Goodman C., et al. Is private health care the answer to the health problems of the world’s poor? PLoS Med. 2008;5(11): https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0050233
13. Borsa A., Bejarano G., Ellen M., et al. Evaluating trends in private equity ownership and impacts on health outcomes, costs, and quality: systematic review. 2023;382:e075244. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2023-075244
14. Kaabi S., Varughese B., Singh R. Public and Private Healthcare System in Terms of both Quality and Cost: A Review. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2022;16(8):1–8. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/55387.16742
15. Berendes S., Heywood P., Oliver S., et al. Quality of private and public ambulatory health care in low and middle income countries: systematic review of comparative studies. PLoS Med. 2011;8(4):e1000433. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000433
16. Kalaja R. Determinants of Patient Satisfaction with Health Care: A Literature Review. 2022;6(1):43–54. https://doi.org/10.2478/ejnsm-2023-0005
17. Farahani M.F., Shamsikhani S., Hezaveh M.S. Patient satisfaction with nursing and medical care in hospitals affiliated to arak university of medical sciences in 2009. Nursing and Midwifery Studies. 2014;3(3):e14022. https://doi.org/17795/nmsjournal14022
18. Tam J. Linking quality improvement with patient satisfaction: a study of a health service center. Marketing Intelligence & Planning. 2007;25(7):732–745 https://doi.org/1108/02634500710834197
19. Akthar N., Nayak S., Pai P.Y. Determinants of patient satisfaction in Asia: Evidence from systematic review of literature. Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health. 2023;23(4):101393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cegh.2023.101393
20. Batbaatar E., Dorjdagva J., Luvsannyam A., et al. Determinants of patient satisfaction: a systematic review. Perspect Public Health. 2017;137(2):89–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/1757913916634136
21. Tateke T., Woldie M., Ololo S. Determinants of patient satisfaction with outpatient health services at public and private hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2012;4(1):384. https://doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v4i1.384
22. Anbori A., Ghani S.N., Yadav H., et al. Patient satisfaction and loyalty to the private hospitals in Sana’a, Yemen. Int J Qual Health C. 2010;22(4):310–315. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzq029
23. Hoxha R., Kosevska E., Berisha M., et al. Predictive factors for patient satisfaction in public and private hospitals in Kosovo (Original research). 2019;12. https://doi.org/10.56801/seejph.vi.144
24. Akbar F., Rivai F., Awang A. The differences of patient satisfaction level in public and private hospitals in Makassar, Indonesia. Enfermería Clínica. 2020;30:165–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enfcli.2020.06.038
25. Ghazanfar A., Idress I.N., Zia Z., et al. Comparison of patient’s satisfaction levels in public and private tertiary care centres. J Pak Med Assoc. 2017;67(8):1305–1308
26. Sheshi I., Issa Y., Aderibigbe S., et al. Comparative Study of Enrollee Satisfaction with Private and Public Health Care Providers of Community Based Health Insurance Scheme in Edu LGA, Kwara State. Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology. 2020;39(32):77–84. https://doi.org/10.9734/cjast/2020/v39i3231003
27. Zarei A., Arab M., Froushani A.R., et al. Service quality of private hospitals: the Iranian Patients’ perspective. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-31
28. Goodair B., Reeves A. The effect of health-care privatisation on the quality of care. Lancet Public Health. 2024;9(3):e199-e206. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(24)00003-3
29. Hollingsworth B., Dawson P.J., Maniadakis N. Efficiency measurement of health care: A review of nonparametric methods and applications. 1999;2(3):161–172. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1019087828488
30. Hollingsworth B. Non-parametric and parametric applications measuring efficiency in health care. Health Care Management Science. 2003;6(4):203–2 https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1026255523228
31. Hollingsworth B. The measurement of efficiency and productivity of health care delivery. Health Economics. 2008;17(10):1107–11 https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.1391
32. Lee K., Yang S., Choi M. The association between hospital ownership and technical efficiency in a managed care environment. J Med Syst. 2009;33(4):307–315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-008-9192-2
33. Nguyen Thi P.L, Briançon S., Empereur F., et al. Factors determining inpatient satisfaction with care. Soc Sci Med. 2002;54(4):493–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0277-9536(01)00045-4
34. Jaipaul C.K., Rosenthal G.E. Are older patients more satisfied with hospital care than younger patients? J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18(1):23–30. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.20114.x
35. Xiao H., Barber J.P. The effect of perceived health status on patient satisfaction. Value Health J Int Soc Pharmacoeconomics Outcomes Res. 2008;11(4):719–725. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00294.x
36. Dayasiri M.B., Lekamge E.L. Predictors of patient satisfaction with the quality of healthcare in Asian Hospitals. Australas Med J. 2010;3:739–744. https://doi.org/10.4066/AMJ.2010.375
37. Jawaid A., Ahmed N., Alam S.N., et al. Patient's experiences and satisfaction from surgical outpatient department of a tertiary care teaching hospital. Pak J Med Sci. 2009;25(3):439–442
38. Akbar F.H., Ayuandyka U. Gender and age differences in patient satisfaction with dental care in the urban and rural areas of Indonesia: Pilot pathfinder survey. Pesqui Bras Odontopediatria Clin Integr. 2018;18(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.4034/PBOCI.2018.181.80
39. Yuan Y. Public satisfaction with health care system in 30 countries: The effects of individual characteristics and social contexts. Health Policy. 2021;125(10):1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.08.005
40. Becker G., Newsom E. Socioeconomic status and dis-satisfaction with healthcare among chronically ill African Americans. Am J Public Health. 2003;93(5):742–74 https://doi.org/ 10.2105/ajph.93.5.742
41. Danish K., Khan U., Chaudhry T., et al. Patient satisfaction; An experience at IIMC-T Railway Hospital. Rawal Med J. 2008;33(2):245-248.
42. Kislitsyna O.A., Chubarova T.V. Assessment of the health care system in Russia: experience of constructing a regional rating. Vestnik Instituta ekonomiki Rossijskoj akademii nauk=Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2021;3:35–71. https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2021_3_35_71 (In Russ.)
43. Ulumbekova G.E., Ginoyan A.B. Rating of the effectiveness of healthcare systems in the regions of the Russian Federation in 2019. ORGZDRAV: novosti, mneniya, obuchenie. Vestnik VSHOUZ=ORGZDRAV: news, opinions, training. VSHOUZ Bulletin. 2021;7(1):4–16. https://doi.org/10.33029/2411-8621-2021-7-1-4-16 (In Russ.)