CHIEF EDITOR’S COLUMN

TITLE

Chief Editor's column

Vyacheslav N. Bobkov

Размер файла
Размер файла  2.828 MB Размер файла Full text

INDEX

EDI (Editorial article)

EDN DLUZQB

AUTHOR

Vyacheslav N. Bobkov

Editor-in-chief of the scientific and practical journal “Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia”, Moscow, Russia

e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

ORCID : https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7364-5297

SPIN-code:  5639-0410

RSCI Author ID:275902

ReseacherID: U-6527-2019

Scopus Author ID:  55960509800

AUTHOR BIOGRAFY

Vyacheslav N. Bobkov

Doctor of Economics, Professor, Honoured Science Worker of the Russian Federation, Chief Research Worker, Head of the Department of Socioeconomic Research of Living Standards and Quality of Live at the Centre of Development of Human Potential at the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences

SCIENTIFIC LIFE

TITLE

De-Standardisation of Employment: from Practice to Theory and vice versa. Results of the Round Table at the IX St. Petersburg International Labor Forum

Olesya V. Veredyuk

Размер файла000
Размер файла  2.828 MB Размер файла Full text

INDEX

CNF (Conference proceedings)

JEL J01

https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2025_21_3_11_480_490 

AUTHOR

Olesya V. Veredyuk

St. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, Russia

e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9862-633X

RSCI Author ID: 287329

Researcher ID: K-7044-2013

FOR CITATION

Veredyuk O.V. De-Standardisation of Employment: from Practice to Theory and vice versa. Results of the Round Table at the IX St. Petersburg International Labor Forum. Uroven' Zhizni Naseleniya Regionov Rossii=Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2025;21(3):480–490. https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2025_21_3_11_480_490 (In Russ.)

Abstract

The article reviews current views of academic economists and practicing economists on the de-standardization of employment. The data for the article was obtained by the author from speakers who presented at the round table «Destandardization of Employment: From Practice to Theory and Vice Versa» on April 3, 2025, as part of the IX St. Petersburg International Labor Forum. Academic economists from nine scientific and scientific-educational organizations and practitioners from three companies of different sectors of the economy discussed the de-standardization of employment from the perspective of the general issues of employment transformation in the context of the digitalization of the economy, labor shortages, and the search for new models of regulation, employee support, and solutions for business. Various forms of employment were considered: from temporary and self-employment to platform-based employment, with a focus on their impact on worker well-being, employment stability, and quality of working life. This years’ experience of jointly participating in the event was rated as successful by representatives of academic economists and practicing economists, and they jointly decided to continue it at next year's anniversary Labor Forum.

Keywords

employment, employment de-standardisation, employment quality, precarious employment, labour forum, economic theory, practice

AUTHOR'S BIOGRAFY

Olesya V. Veredyuk

PhD in Economics, Associate Professor, St. Petersburg State University

References

  1. Yakovleva N.G., Shafranskaya A.M. Training of Qualified Personnel to Ensure Technological Sovereignty of the Russian Economy: Priority Measures. Uroven' zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii=Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2024;20(4):515–529. https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2024_20_4_3_515_529 (In Russ.)
  2. Lebedev O.V., Yanovskaya A.A. Analytical View on the Development of the Labor Market and Education System in the Russian Federation. Sotsial'no-trudovye issledovaniya=Social and Labor Research. 2024;(2(55)):15-24. https://doi.org/34022/2658-3712-2024-55-2-15-24 (in Russ.)
  3. Bobkov V.N., Odintsova E.V., Ivanova T.V., Chashchina T.V. Significant Indicators of Precarious Employment and Their Priority. Uroven' zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii=Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2022;18(4):502–520. https://doi.org/19181/lsprr.2022.18.4.7 (In Russ.)
  4. Odintsova Е. Assessment of Precarious Employment in the Russian Formal Sector: From the Level of Workers to the Level of Households. Obshchestvo i ehkonomika=Society and Economy. 2025;(8):18-32. https://doi.org/31857/S0207367625080022 (in Russ.)
  5. Chernykh E.A. Dynamics and Determinants of Job Satisfaction of Russians in the Characteristics of the Human Potential. Uroven' zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii=Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2023;19(2):199–215. https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2023_19_2_4_199_215 (In Russ.)
  6. Soboleva I. Employment Quality and Work-Related Well-Being: Approaches to Measurement. Vestnik Instituta Ekonomiki Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk=The Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2024;(3):7–25. https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2024_3_7_25 (in Russ.)
  7. Soh M., Zarola A., Palaiou K., Furnham A. Work-Related Well- Health Psychology Open. 2016;(1):1-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2055102916628380
  8. Berestova L., Chernukha O. The Concept and Features of the Activities of Self-Employed Citizens in Russia. Municipal'naya akademiya=Municipal Academy. 2023;(4):151-155. https://doi.org/52176/2304831X_2023_04_151 (in Russ.)
  9. Razumova T.O., Kirsanova N.M. Self-Employment and Freelance: Employees Adapting to the Modern Labor Market. Sotsial'no-trudovye issledovaniya=Social and Labor Research. 2022;(2(47)):56-68. https://doi.org/34022/2658-3712-2022-47-2-56-68 (in Russ.)
  10. Acemoglu D., Restrepo P. Robots and Jobs: Evidence from US Labor Markets. Journal of Political Economy. 2020;128(6):2188-2244. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2940245
  11. Bughin J. Artificial Intelligence, Its Corporate Use and How It will Affect the Future of Work. In: Paganetto L. (ed.) Capitalism, Global Change and Sustainable Development. Springer International Publishing; 2020. P. 239-260. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46143-0_14
  12. Babina T., Fedyk A., He A. X., et al. Firm Investments in Artificial Intelligence Technologies and Changes in Workforce Composition. Working Paper No. 31325. National Bureau of Economic Research. England: Cambridge; 2023 June. 16 p.
  13. Kapeliushnikov R.I., Zinchenko D.I. Digital Forms of Employment in the Russian Labor Part I. Distant Employment. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ehkonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny=Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes. 2024;(6(184));157–181. https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2024.6.2654 (In Russ.)
  14. Kapeliushnikov R.I., Zinchenko D.I. Digital Forms of Employment in the Russian Labor Market. Part II. Platform Employment. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ehkonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny=Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes. 2025;(1(185)):107-129. https://doi.org/14515/monitoring.2025.1.2782 (In Russ.)
  15. Atkinson J., Rick J., Morris S., et al. Temporary Work and the Labour Market. Report No. 311. The Institute for employment England: IES; 1996. 99 p.
  16. Bobkov O.N., Veredyuk O.V. De-Standardisation of Employment: Сhallenge or Solution? Uroven' zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii=Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2024;20(2):196–210. https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2024_20_2_5_196_210 (In Russ.)

 

SCIENTIFIC LIFE

TITLE

Human Development in Russia: Status, Prospects, Solutions (Review of the Thematic Session of the Scientific Conference «Transformation of the Russian Economy in New Conditions. By the 95th Anniversary of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences»)

Tat'yana V. Chashchina

Размер файла000
Размер файла  2.828 MB Размер файла Full text

INDEX

CNF (Conference proceedings)

JEL O15, J10

https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2025_21_3_10_474_479

AUTHOR

Tat'yana V. Chashchina

Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia 

e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3384-3413

SPIN-code: 1770-4231

RSCI Author ID: 591597

ResearcherID: GQH-0078-2022

FOR CITATION

Chashchina T.V. Human Development in Russia: Status, Prospects, Solutions (Review of the Thematic Session of the Scientific Conference «Transformation of the Russian Economy in New Conditions. By the 95th Anniversary of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences»). Uroven' zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii=Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2025;21(3):474–479. https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2025_21_3_10_474_479 (In Russ.)

Abstract

The review is dedicated to the results of the fifth section «Development of human potential in Russia: status, prospects, solutions» of the anniversary scientific conference «Transformation of the Russian economy in new conditions. On the 95th anniversary of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences», which was held at the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences on June 23-25, 2025. The section featured reports on the status, prospects and ways to solve problems of human potential development: factors of life expectancy in the context of preserving Russia's human potential, the health care crisis and prospects for transforming health care, inequality of living standards in the modern new conditions of Russia's development, labor potential in Russia and its gender components, theoretical and methodological approaches to measuring and assessing well-being in the labor sphere are considered, and the results of a study on measuring and assessing well-being associated with work are presented using the example of the Vologda region.

Keywords

human potential, life expectancy, health care, inequality, standard of living, wages, labor potential, employee well-being

AUTHOR'S BIOGRAFY

Tat'yana V. Chashchina

PhD in Economics, Senior Research Worker of the Department of Socioeconomic Research of Living Standards and Quality of Live at the Centre of Development of Human Potential at the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences

References

  1. Rostovskaya T.K., Shabunova A.A., Arkhangel'skii V.N., et al. Demograficheskoe Samochuvstvie Regionov Rossii. National Demographic Report 2024. Moscow, Vologda: Vologda Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences; 2025. 385 p. ISBN 978-5-93299-621-8 (In Russ.)
  2. Moskovskaya А.А. Social Innovation in Medical Care: Forms, Mechanisms and Transformative Potential. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ehkonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny=Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes. 2025;(3):270-293. https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2025.3.2818 (In Russ.)
  3. Bobkov V.N., Gulyugina A.A. (ex. eds.), Odintsova E.V., et al. Monitoring of Incomes and Living Standarts of The Russian Population – 2024. Yearbook. 2024. Issue 3(204). Moscow: IE RAS; 2025. 170 p. ISBN 978-5-9940-0792-1 (In Russ.)
  4. Brimbetova N.Zh., Chulanova Z.K. Optimization of Wage Structure and Limits of Abovetariff Payments in Kazakhstan. Statistika, uchet i audit=Statistics, accounting and audit. 2024;(3(94)):141-152. https://doi.org/10.51579/1563-2415.2024.-3.11(In Russ.)
  5. Baskakova M.E. Gendernye Razlichiya v Oplate Truda v Rossii - Rol' Otraslevoi Segregatsii (Istoriya Voprosa). Income, Expenses and Savings of the Population of Russia: Trends and Prospects X International Scientific and Practical Conference Proceedings; November 29, 2025; Moscow, Russia. Moscow: Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2025:32-36. (In Russ.)
  6. Soboleva I.V. Employment Quality and Work-Related Well-Being: Approaches to Measurement. Vestnik Instituta Ekonomiki Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk=The Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2024;(3):7-25. https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2024_3_7_25 (In Russ.)

 

DEMOGRAPHIC RESEARCH

TITLE

Resource Potential of the EAEU Labor Market and Migration Processes in Russia

Gleb L. Podvoiskii

Размер файла000
Размер файла  2.828 MB Размер файла Full text

INDEX

RAR (Research Article Report)

JEL O15

https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2025_21_3_9_461_473

AUTHOR

Gleb L. Podvoiskii

Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia

e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8698-7496

SPIN-code: 5905-7218

RSCI Author ID: 841446

FOR CITATION

Podvoiskii G.L. Resource Potential of the EAEU Labor Market and Migration Processes in Russia Uroven' Zhizni Naseleniya Regionov Rossii=Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2025;21(3):461–473. https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2025_21_3_9_461_473 (In Russ.)

Abstract

Integration processes formed and developing within the framework of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) have a significant impact on the national markets of the member countries of this association, therefore, the process of evolution of the national labour markets of the EAEU member countries requires comprehensive detailed consideration and expert and analytical support, taking into account the dynamics and structure of the single labour market of the EAEU. The resource potential, qualitative and quantitative characteristics of the EAEU single labour market, its dynamics and development structure determine the sustainability of national labour markets, including the Russian one. The theoretical and methodological basis of the study are the works of Russian and foreign researchers, containing assessments of the resource potential and dynamics of the EAEU single labour market and the Russian labour market in the relationship with the integration processes initiated within the framework of this association, as well as with the problems and possible ways to reduce destabilizing factors. The information sources of the study are statistical and expert-analytical materials of statistical services of the Russian Federation and the Eurasian Economic Commission (EEC). The main results of the study are the conclusions about the need to assess the effectiveness of migration processes within the EAEU for the Russian labour market, taking into account the differences in the volume of markets of EAEU member states, sectoral needs and qualification characteristics of migrating labour resources, as well as the tasks of spatial development of the Russian Federation and the factors of external influence on the development of the Russian economy under sanctions pressure. The aim of the study is to describe, based on statistical data and expert assessments, the resource potential and dynamics of development of the common labour market of the EAEU and the Russian labour market. To achieve the goal of the study, the author sets the task to structure qualitative and quantitative characteristics of the common EAEU labour market on the basis of available statistical data, assess the dynamics of its development and determine the parameters of the impact of integration processes on the sustainability of the EAEU RT as a whole and the Russian labour market.

Keywords

single labor market of the EAEU, Russian labor market, free movement of labor, stability of the labor market, dynamics of labor market development, structure of the labor market, labor migration

AUTHOR BIOGRAFY

Gleb L. Podvoiskii

PhD in Economics, Leading Research Worker, Centre of Development of Human Potential, Institute of Economics of the RAS

References

  1. Gimpelson V.E., Zudina A.A., Kapeliushnikov R.I. Non-Cognitive Components of Human Capital: Evidence from Russian Data. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2020;(11):5-31. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2020-11-5-31 (In Russ.)
  2. Kapelyushnikov R.I. Struktura Rossiiskoi Rabochei Sily: Osobennosti i Dinamika. Moscow: The HSE Publishing House; 2006. 59 p. (in Russ.)
  3. Konings J., Lermann H. Marshall and Labor Demand in Russia: Going Back to Basics. Journal of Comparative Economics. 2002;30(1):134-159. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcec.2001.1759
  4. Layard R., Ashenfelter O. Handbook of Labor Economics. North-Holland: Elsevier; 1987. 510 p. ISBN 0444878572
  5. Mosler Vidal E. Leveraging Human Mobility to Rescue the 2030 Agenda. IOM Flagship Report for the SDG Summit. Geneva: IOM; 2023. 66 p. ISBN 978-92-9268-729-8
  6. World Development Report 2023: Migrants, Refugees, and Societies. Washington: World Bank; 348 p. ISBN 978-1-4648-1942-1 https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1941-4
  7. Kapeliushnikov R. The Russian Labor Market: a Statistical Portrait on the Crises Background. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2023;(8):5-37. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2023-8-5-37 (in Russ.)
  8. Aranzhin V.V. The Conditions for Solving the Problem of a Shortage of Highly Qualified Employees in Innovative Organizations. Vestnik YUURGU. Seriya «Ehkonomika i menedzhment»=Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Ser. Economics and Management. 2017;11(2):71–74. https://doi.org/10.14529/em170210 (in Russ.)
  9. Kolesnikova O.A., Maslova E.V., Okolelykh I.V. Personnel Shortage in the Current Russian Labor Market: Manifestations, Causes, Trends, Measures to Overcome it. Sotsial'no-trudovye issledovaniya=Social and Labor Research. 2023;(4(53)):179-189. https://doi.org/10.34022/2658–3712–2023–53–4–179–189 (in Russ.)
  10. Kamari D.M. The Problem of Informal Employment in Russia and the EAEU. Sotsial'no-trudovye issledovaniya=Social and Labor Research. 2024;(2(55)):54-61. https://doi.org/10.34022/2658-3712-2024-55-2-54-61 (in Russ.)
  11. Platygin D. N., Popkov S. Yu., Smirnov V. M., et al. System of Monitoring, Analysis and Expertise of Labour Relations. Sotsial'no-trudovye issledovaniya=Social and Labor Research. 2020;(4(41)):27-39. https://doi.org/10.34022/2658-3712-2020-41-4-27-39 (in Russ.)
  12. Voloshina I.A., Dzhuma V.I., Mukhina I.I. Demand for Workforce and Professions in 2021-2022: Job Analysis Results. Sotsial'no-trudovye issledovaniya=Social and Labor Research. 2022;48(3):118-130. https://doi.org/10.34022/2658-3712-2022-48-3-118-130 (in Russ.)
  13. Orlova L.N., Smirnov V.M. Minimizing State’s Risks from Illegal Migrants’ Labour. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 6. Ehkonomika=Moscow University Economics Bulletin. 2024;59(2):153-176. https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU0130-0105-6-59-2-8 (in Russ.)
  14. Toksanbaeva M.S., Popova R.I. Labor Resources as a Characteristic of Labor Potential and their Structure. Narodonaselenie=Population. 2022;25(4):151-162. https://doi.org/10.19181/population.2022.25.4.13 (in Russ.)
  15. Trifonova K.V. International Legal Regulation of Labor Migration: a System Analysis. Uchenye zapiski Krymskogo federal'nogo universiteta imeni V.I. Vernadskogo. Yuridicheskie nauki=Scientific Notes of V. I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University. Juridical science. 2023;9(2):247-252. (in Russ.)
  16. Karimova A.A. Population Migration: Essence and Statistical Indicators. Ekonomika i predprinimatel'stvo=Economics and Entrepreneurship. 2019;(11(112)):231-234. (in Russ.)
ECONOMIC RESEARCH

TITLE

The Problem of the Digital Inequality of the Population in the Regions of the Russian Federation

Natalia Yu. Sorokina

Размер файла000
Размер файла  2.828 MB Размер файла Full text

INDEX

RAR (Research Article Report)

JEL R1, R50

https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2025_21_3_8_447_460   

AUTHOR

Natalia Yu. Sorokina

Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia

e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

ORCID : https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5180-3389

SPIN-code: 9611-0513

RSCI Author ID: 625147

Scopus Author ID:  57205168159

FOR CITATION

Sorokina N.Yu. The Problem of the Digital Inequality of the Population in the Regions of the Russian Federation. Uroven' Zhizni Naseleniya Regionov Rossii=Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2025;21(3):447–460. https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2025_21_3_8_447_460 (In Russ.)

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to study the problem of digital inequality of the population in the spatial aspect and identify the specifics of its manifestation at the level of federal districts and regions of the Russian Federation. Research objectives: to substantiate the composition of indicators for assessing the digital inequality of the population of Russian regions; to study indicators of the digital inequality of the Russian population by federal districts; to propose a classification of Russian regions depending on the direction and sustainability of changes in indicators of digital inequality. The methodological basis of the study is a two-level approach to the diagnosis of digital inequality of the population, according to which digital inequality of the first order is distinguished, consisting in unequal conditions in access / use of information technologies; and digital inequality of the second order, determined by differences in the specifics of the use of information technologies by groups of the population. The composition of indicators for assessing the availability of digital information resources and the skills of using information and communication technologies by the population is substantiated. It is proved that, firstly, the scale of digital inequality in access to the Internet in the spatial aspect has significantly decreased; secondly, the inequality caused by differences in the specifics of the use of information technologies is significantly higher than the inequality in public access to the Internet; thirdly, the level of Internet use for public and municipal services higher than for ordering other goods and services. It is concluded that in the context of the active digitalization of the processes of providing state and municipal services, the identified "gaps" indicate the existence of inequality in the availability of these services for residents of various territories of the Russian Federation. The study confirmed the differentiation of the Russian population in terms of the possibilities of obtaining (purchasing) a wide range of goods and services provided through the use of digital government and commercial services. The results of the study can be used to improve the state policy of the Russian Federation in the field of digital transformation in the direction of its greater focus on solving the problem of digital inequality in the regions.

Keywords

digital inequality of the population, Russian regions, spatial development, national development goals, digital economy, digital transformation, strategic planning

AUTHOR BIOGRAFY

Natalia Yu. Sorokina

PhD in Economics, Associate Professor, Senior Researcher, Center for Federal Relations and Regional Development, Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences

References

  1. Nureev R.M., Karapaev O.V. Digital Economy as an Economic Institute. Journal of Economic Regulation. 2019;10(2):6-27. https://doi.org/17835/2078-5429.2019.10.2.006-027 (In Russ.)
  2. Rudnik P.B. (head of auth.), Abdrakhmanova G.I., Vasil'kovskii S.A., et al. Tsifrovaya transformatsiya: ozhidaniya i real'nost'. Report for the XXIII Yasinsky (April) International Scientific Conference on Problems of Economic and Social Development; 2022; Moscow, Russia. Moscow: Publishing House of the Higher School of Economics; 2022. 221 p. ISBN 978-5-7598-2658-3
  3. Abramov V.I., Andreev V.D. Analysis of Strategies for Digital Transformation of Russian Regions in The Context of Achieving National Goals. Voprosy gosudarstvennogo i munitsipal'nogo upravleniya=Public Administration Issues. 2023;(1):89–119. https://doi.org/:10.17323/1999-5431-2023-0-1-89-119 (In Russ.)
  4. Sorokina N.Yu. Osobennosti tsifrovizatsii v staropromyshlennykh regionakh Rossii. In: Tsifrovaya transformatsiya promyshlennosti: tendentsii, upravlenie, strategii. Collection of scientific articles. Yekaterinburg: Institute of Economics - Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences; 2023. P. 113-123. https://doi.org /10.17059/dti-2023-10 (In Russ.)
  5. Jung J. Y., Qiu J. L., Kim Y. C. Internet Connectedness and Inequality Beyond The «Divide». Communication Research. 2001;28(4):507-535. https://doi.org/1177/009365001028004006
  6. Torres P., Augusto M. Digitalisation, Social Entrepreneurship and National Well-Being. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2020;(161),120279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.1202792020
  7. Twizeyimana J.D, Andersson A. The Public Value of E-Government - a Literature Review. Government Information Quarterly. 2019;36(2):167-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.01.001
  8. Pirannejad A., Ingrams A. Open Government Maturity Models: A Global Comparison. Social Science Computer Review. 2023;41(4):1140–1165. https://doi.org/10.1177/08944393211063107
  9. Yuzhakov V.N., Pokida A.N., Zybunovskaya N.V., et al. Monitoring Tsifrovizatsii Gosudarstvennogo Upravleniya (Dinamika Otsenok Grazhdan v 2022-20024 gg.). Moscow: Publishing house «Delo» RANEPA; 2025. 264 p. ISBN 978-5-85006-650-5
  10. Van Dijk J. A.G.M. The Evolution of The Digital Divide: The Digital Divide Turns to Inequality of Skills and Usage. In: Bus J., Crompton M., Hildebrandt M. (eds), et al. Digital enlightenment yearbook. Amsterdam: IOS Press Ebooks; Р. 57-75. ISBN 978-1-61499-056-7
  11. Hilbert М. Digital Gender Divide or Technologically Empowered Women in Developing Countries? A Typical Case of Lies, Damned Lies, and Statistics. Women’s Studies International Forum. 2011;34(6):479-489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2011.07.001
  12. Attewell P. Comment: The First and Second Digital Divides, Sociology of Education. 2001;74(3):252-259. https://doi.org/10.2307/2673277
  13. Ragnedda M., Muschert G.W. The Digital Divide: The Internet and Social Inequality in International Perspective. England: Routledge; 2013. 344 p.
  14. Zemtsov S.P., Demidova K.V., Kichaev D.Yu. Internet Spread and Interregional Digital Inequality in Russia: Trends, Factors, and Impact of the Pandemic. Baltijskij region=Baltic Region. 2022;14(4):57-78. https://doi.org/10.5922/2079-8555-2022-4-4 (In Russ.)
  15. Popov E.V., Semyachkov K.A., Simonova V.L. Assessment of the Impact of Information and Communication Technologies on Innovative Activity of Regions. Finansy i kredit=Finance and Credit. 2016;(46(718)):46–60. (In Russ.)
  16. Yudina M.A. The Impact of Digitalization on Social Inequality. Uroven' zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii=Standard of Living of the Population of Russian Regions. 2020;16(1):97−108. https://doi.org/10.19181/lsprr.2020.16.1.10 (In Russ.)
  17. Groshev I.V., Krasnoslobodcev A.A. Digitalization and Creativity of Russian Regions. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya=Sociological Studies. 2020;(5):66-78. https://doi.org/10.31857/S013216250009390-2 (In Russ.)
  18. Dudin M.N., Shkodinsky S.V., Usmanov D.I. Assessing of the Digital Inequality Impact on of Socio-Economic Development of the Regions of the Russian Federation. Voprosy innovatsionnoi ehkonomiki=Russian Journal of Innovation Economics. 2021;11(3):961-984. https://doi.org/10.18334/vinec.11.3.113452 (In Russ.)
  19. Bobkov V.N., Bobkova T.E., Vershinina M.A. Uroven' i Kachestvo Zhizni Naseleniya Rossii: ot Real'nosti k Proektirovaniyu Budushchego. Monograph. FCTAS RAS. Moscow: FCTAS RAS; 2022. 274 p. ISBN 978-5-89697-388-1 https://doi.org/10.19181/monogr.978-5-89697-388-1.2022 (In Russ.)
  20. Mitrofanova I.V., Bisakaeva M.A., Gukasova N.R., Orlyanskaya A.A. Digital Transformation of Peripheral Regions of the South of Russia (on the Example of the Chechen Republic). Ehkonomika: vchera, segodnya, zavtra=Economics: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow. 2018;8(10A):117-131. (In Russ.)
  21. Prokhorov Y.N., Karashchuk O.S. Etail Internet Trade in Russia: Standing, Trends and Further Development. Vestnik Rossiiskogo ehkonomicheskogo universiteta imeni G.V. Plekhanova=Vestnik of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics. 2020;17(5(113)):196-206. (In Russ.)
  22. Trofimova I.N. Availability and Use of the Internet Network by the Population in the Regions. Rossiya reformiruyushchayasya. 2023;(21):384-406. https://doi.org/10.19181/ezheg.2023.1 (In Russ.)