ECONOMIC RESEARCH
TITLE
Applied Labor Economics in Conditions of Double Personnel Shortage: Revival and New Challenges. Part 1
Ruslan A. Dolzhenko, Svetlana B. Dolzhenko, Vladimir S. Polovinko
163–171 | 2.88 MB | Full text |
INDEX
RAR (Research Article Report)
https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2024_20_2_2_163_171
EDN DBRIAR
AUTHORS
Ruslan A. Dolzhenko
Ural State University of Economics
e-mail:
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3524-3005
SPIN-код: 8576-4140
РИНЦ Author ID: 617562
ResearcherID: J-2847-2015
Svetlana B. Dolzhenko
Ural State University of Economics
e-mail:
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2575-9588
SPIN-код: 8557-7373
РИНЦ Author ID: 148831
ResearcherID: B-5311-2018
Vladimir S. Polovinko
Dostoevsky Omsk State University, Omsk, Russia
e-mail:
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6858-045X
SPIN-код: 8454-2897
РИНЦ Author ID: 155877
ResearcherID: A-4317-2017
FOR CITATION
Dolzhenko R.A., Dolzhenko S.B., Polovinko V.S. Applied Labor Economics in Conditions of Double Personnel Shortage: Revival and
New Challenges.Part 1. Uroven' zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii=Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2024;20(2):163–171.
https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2024_20_2_2_163_171 (In Russ.)
ABSTRACT
Modern applied economics is in conditions of a systemic crisis, which, on the one hand, is constrained by government policy, and on the
other, by the actions of business. The accumulation of contradictions between subjects, organizational goals and opportunities to achieve them continues. To find the necessary resources, as well as search for reserves of labor productivity, effective tools are needed, primarily related to the use of developments in the field of applied economics and scientific organization of labor. The purpose of the study is, based on an analysis of unfolding trends, an assessment of the current situation in the use of tools of applied labor economics at enterprises, to determine the prospects for the development of domestic approaches, the accumulation of the best experience of the country's companies in these areas. Research methods: expert interviews with scientists (9 interviews were conducted with scientists with experience in scientific and applied research in the field of labor economics), as well as heads of departments at industrial enterprises (7 interviews were conducted with HR directors, heads of occupational safety and health departments and centers for improving organizational efficiency), analysis of documents and experience of the country's largest enterprises (the experience of 11 enterprises was studied). The results of the study showed that it is necessary to develop and transmit an up-to-date methodology for increasing organizational efficiency and labor productivity through the development of areas of labor economics in enterprises. The project “Labor Productivity and Employment” requires clarification of goals and approaches to achieving them. It is necessary to consolidate the expert community in the field of labor economics and assemble a universal methodology for the scientific organization of labor 2.0, its testing, taking into account modifications for different sectors of the economy. The results of the analysis can be useful to scientists in the field of personnel management, labor economics and organizational effectiveness to
update the research agenda, as well as to enterprises that are interested in increasing labor productivity and personnel efficiency.
KEYWORDS
labor economics, applied labor economics, labor efficiency, labor productivity, trends, business development, personnel management
AUTHORS BIOGRAFY
Ruslan A. Dolzhenko
Doctor of Economics, Professor of the Department of Labor Economics and Personnel Management, Ural State
University of Economics
Svetlana B. Dolzhenko
PhD in Economics, Head of the Department of Labor Economics and Personnel Management, Ural State
University of Economics
Vladimir S. Polovinko
Doctor of Economics, Head of the Department of Regional Economics and Human Resource Management,
Dostoevsky Omsk State University
REFERENCES
1. Strumilin S.G. Problemy ehkonomiki truda. Moscow: Publishing House «Nauka»; 1982. 377 p. (In Russ.)
2. Gastev A.K. Kak nado rabotat'. Prakticheskoe vvedenie v nauku organizatsii truda. 2nd ed. Moscow: Publishing House «Ehkonomika»; 1972. 478 p. (In Russ.)
3. Odegov Yu.G., Rudenko G.G., Babynina L.S. Ehkonomika truda. Textbook. In 2 Vol. Vol. 1. Moscow: Publishing House «Al'faPress»; 2007. 760 p. ISBN 5-94280-242-4 (In Russ.)
4. Ehrenberg R., Smith R. Modern Labor Economics: Theory and Public Policy. Moscow: MSU; 1996. 800 p. ISBN 0-673-46787-2,
5-211-03607-7 (In Russ.)
5. Borjas G.J. Labor Economics. 3d ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2005. 576 p. ISBN 978-0-07-352320-0
6. Altonji J.G., Shakotko R. Do Wages Rise with Job Seniority? Review of Economic Studies. 1987;54(3):437-459. https://doi.
org/10.2307/2297568
7. Dickens W.T., Lang К. Labor Market Segmentation Theory: Reconsidering the Evidence. NBER Working Paper. 1992;(4087).
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2938-1_6
8. Gronau R.L. Home Production and Work – The Theory of the Allocation of Time Revisited. Journal of Political Economy.
1977;85(6):1099-1123. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/260629
9. Lazear E.P. Personnel Economics: Past Lessons and Future Directions. Journal of Labor Economics. 1998;17(2):199-236. https://
doi.org/10.1086/209918
10. Kolosnitsyna M.G. Ehkonomika truda. Textbook for undergraduate students of economic universities. Moscow: ICHP Publishing House «MagistR»; 1998. 240 p. ISBN 5-89317-072-5 (In Russ.)
11. Roshchin S.Yu., Razumova T.O. Ehkonomika truda (ehkonomicheskaya teoriya truda). Textbook. Moscow: Publishing House
«INFRA-M»; 2000. 400 p. ISBN 5-16-000146-8 (In Russ.)
12. Asaliev A.M., Bobkov V.N., Bychin V.B., et al. Ehkonomika Truda. Textbook. Moscow: Publishing House «INFRA-M»; 2014.
336 p. ISBN 978-5-16-009415-1 (In Russ.)
13. Ohno T. Toyota Production System: Beyond Large-Scale Production. Moscow: Institute for Complex Strategic Studies; 2005.
192 p. ISBN 5-902677-04-1 (In Russ.)
14. Turovets O.G., Rodionova V.N. The genesis of lean production: Russian origins. Organizator proizvodstva=Organizer of Production. 2015;(2(65)):5-12. (In Russ.)
15. Avdeev M.YU. A theoretical review of modern approaches to labor productivity management. Teoriya i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiya=Theory and Practice of Social Development. 2019;5(135):38-41. https://doi.org/10.24158/tipor.2019.5.5 (In Russ.)
16. Lochner B., Schulz B. Firm Productivity, Wages, and Sorting. Journal of Labor Economics. 2024;42(1):85–119. https://doi.
org/10.1086/722564
17. Dong X., Hyslop D., Kawaguchi D. Skill, Productivity, and Wages: Direct Evidence from a Temporary Help Agency. Journal of
Labor Economics. 2024;42:133–181. https://doi.org/10.1086/728809
18. Alikhanov R., Bakatina D., Vladimirov V. et al. Ehffektivnaya Rossiya: proizvoditel'nost' kak fundament rosta. Rossiiskii zhurnal menedzhmenta=Russian Management Journal. 2009;7(4):109–168. (In Russ.)
19. Krasnopevtseva I.V. The analysis of macro-, meso- and micro-level factors determining the dynamics of labor productivity at
the production enterprises. Vektor nauki Tol'yattinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Ehkonomika i upravlenie=Science
Vector of Togliatti State University. Series: Economics and Management. 2019;(1(36)):12-18. https://doi.org/10.18323/2221-5689-
2019-1-12-18 (In Russ.)
20. Golovanov A.I. Labor productivity as the base of economical growth of Russia. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo
universiteta=Tomsk State University Journal. Ehkonomika. 2011;(4(16)):89-96. (In Russ.)
21. Kuznetsova M.N. Productivity as an organizational factor in increasing the efficiency of industrial enterprises. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta=Bulletin of Voronezh State Technical University. 2014;10(5-1):148-150.
(In Russ.)
22. Kuchina E.V., Tashchev A.K. Methodological approaches to the estimation of labor productivity at the micro level. Vestnik
Yuzhno-Ural'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Ehkonomika i menedzhment=Bulletin of the South Ural state university.
Series: “Economics and Management». 2017;11(2):42–47. https://doi.org/10.14529/em170206 (In Russ.)
23. Dolzhenko R.A., Plutova M.I., Dolzhenko S.B., et al. Standartizatsiya i razvitie chelovecheskikh resursov v usloviyakh mobilizatsionnoi ehkonomiki. Kazan: Buk LLC; 2023. 272 p. ISBN 978-5-907753-61-7 (In Russ.)
24. Dolzhenko E.R. Artificial intelligence and neural networks in HR management. Upravlenie razvitiem personala. 2023;(3):
170-178. https://doi.org/10.36627/2619-144X-2023-3-3-170-178 (In Russ.)
25. Dolzhenko R.A., Dolzhenko S.B. HR management regulatory model of the company (рart 1). Kadrovik=HR Manager.
2022;(11):64-73 (In Russ.)
26. Dolzhenko R.A., Malyshev D.S. Problems on the way of digital transformation at Russian industrial enterprises. Vestnik
NGUEHU=Vestnik NSUEM. 2022;(1):31-51. https://doi.org/10.34020/2073-6495-2022-1-031-051 (In Russ.)
27. Glaz'ev S.Yu. Economic mobilization conditions and strategy in the Russian statehood reproduction system. Menedzhment i
biznes-administrirovanie=Management and Business Administration. 2018;(2):40-78. (In Russ.)
28. Prokhorov A.P. Russian administration model: compromise between system and population. Voprosy filosofii. 2003;(2):42-52.
(In Russ.)
29. Malyshev D.S. Labor efficiency of the personnel: essence, actuality, approaches to evaluation. Kazanskaya nauka=Kazan Science. 2017;(12):39-41. (In Russ.)
The article was submitted 22.12.2023; approved after reviewing 13.05.2024; accepted for publication 09.06.2024