ECONOMIC RESEARCH
TITLE
Creative Class and Creative Work: Interrelation, Exploitation and Contradictions of Development
Tamara D. Stepanova
 183–195 |
 2 MB |
 Full text |
INDEX
RAR (Research Article Report)
https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2024_20_2_4_183_195
EDN FNVGYT
AUTHOR
Tamara D. Stepanova
Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
e-mail:
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0000-6212-2132
SPIN-код: 3177-7714
РИНЦ Author ID: 388518277
FOR CITATION
Stepanova T.D. Creative Class and Creative Work: Interrelation, Exploitation and Contradictions of Development. Uroven' zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii=Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2024;20(2):183–195. https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2024_20_2_4_183_195 (In Russ.)
ABSTRACT
The development of the creative economy has been one of the most popular areas of economic theory and economic policy for three decades. Despite the constant growth of the creative class and government measures to support the creative sector, the size of the creative economy remains at 3% on average worldwide. The purpose of this article is to show the contradictions and limiting factors in the development of the creative class. The argumentation and conclusions of the article are based primarily on a political economy approach. The main information sources of the study are the following statistical databases: Russian statistical base (Rosstat), ILOSTAT (employment by occupational groups). The theoretical and empirical conclusions presented in the work prove that the quantitative growth of the creative class is not identical to its qualitative development; that the statistical measurement of the creative class through employment in creative industries significantly distorts the original meaning of the category of creative labor and several times underestimates the real number of creative professionals; that the uneven development of the creative class among countries is due, on the one hand, to inequality in economic development and intellectual migration from peripheral states to the center, on the other; that the association of creative professionals into a class has no economic basis due to the incompleteness of the formation of socio-economic stratification; that the creative content of labor under the capitalist mode of production does not eliminate the alienation of surplus value, and the exploitation of creative labor takes on a new form – the alienation of intellectual property rights and subsequent intellectual rent.
KEYWORDS
creative class, creative labor, creative economy, creative industries, labor exploitation, economic development, intellectual
property, intellectual rent
AUTHORS BIOGRAFY
Tamara D. Stepanova
PhD in Economics, Senior Researcher, Sector of Employment Policy and Social and Labor Relations, Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences
REFERENCES
1. Currid-Halkett E., Stolarick K. Baptism by Fire: Did the Creative Class Generate Economic Growth during the Crisis? Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society. 2013;6(1):55-69. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rss021
2. Florida R., Mellander C., Stolarick K. Inside the Black Box of Regional Development—Human Capital, the Creative Class and
Tolerance. Journal of economic geography. 2008;8(5):615-649. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbn023
3. Łuczaj K., Leonowicz-Bukała I., Kurek-Ochmańska O. Creative Class in the Borderlands? The Case of Commuting Scholars in
Poland. Creativity Studies. 2022;15(1):246–262. https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2022.12289
4. Stolarick K., Currid-Halkett E. Creativity and the Crisis: the Impact of Creative Workers on Regional Unemployment. Cities.
2013;33:5-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2012.05.017
5. Lazzarato M. Enterprise and Neomonadology. Logos. 2007;(4(61):168-197. (In Russ.)
6. Grigorova Y.V. Novye formy otchuzhdeniya tvorcheskogo truda v postindustrial'nom obshchestve. Al'ternativy. 2012;(1):
162-168. (In Russ.)
7. Buzgalin A.V., Kolganov A.I. Transformations of the Social Structure of Late Capitalism: from the Proletariat and Bourgeoisie to
the Precariat and the Creative Class? Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya=Sociological Studies. 2019;(1):18-28. https://doi.org/10.31857/
S013216250003744-1 (In Russ.)
8. Khabibullina Z.R. Creative Labor: Distinctive Aspects, Dynamics of Development and Characteristics of System Transformation. Ehkonomicheskaya nauka sovremennoi Rossii=Economics of Contemporary Russia. 2020;(1(88)):32-40. https://doi.
org/10.33293/1609-1442-2020-1(88)-32-40 (In Russ.)
9. Ikegaya M., Debbage K. The Geography of the Super Creative Class in the Greater Tokyo Area: Place of Work and Place of
Residence. City, Culture and Society. 2023;33(100516). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccs.2023.100516
10. Liang S., Wang Q. Cultural and Creative Industries and Urban (re)development in China. Journal of Planning Literature.
2020;35(1):54-70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412219898290
11. Cattivelli V., Stawinoga A. E. Localisation and Determinants of the Creative Class in the Peri-urban Areas. The Case of Northern Italy. City, Culture and Society. 2023;33(100517).
12. Florida R. Creative Class: People Who Change the Future. Trans. from English A. Konstantinov. Moscow: AST; 2011. 430 p.
ISBN 978-5-905102-17-2 (In Russ.)
13. Martin R., Florida R., Pogue M., et al. Creativity, Clusters and the Competitive Advantage of Cities. Competitiveness Review.
2015;25(5):482-496. https://doi.org/10.1108/CR-07-2015-0069
14. Shedyakov V.E. Tvorcheskij trud – sredstvo preodoleniya otchuzhdeniya. In: Sagatovskij V.N. (ed.) Deyatel'nost': filosofskii i
psikhologicheskii aspekty; 1988. P. 64-66. (In Russ.)
15. Goldthorpe J.H., Llewellyn C., Clive P. Social Mobility and Class Structure in Modern Britain. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon
Press; 1987. 398 p. ISBN 9780198272854
16. Wright E.O. Classes. London: Verso; 1985. 360 p. ISBN 978-1-78168-921-9
17. Esping-Andersen G. (ed.). Welfare States in Transition: National Adaptations in Global Economies. London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 1996. 288 p. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446216941
18. Savage M., Devine F., Cunningham N., et al. A New Model of Social Class? Findings from BBC’S Great British Class Survey
Experiment. Sociology. 2013;(47(2)):219–250. https://doi.org/10.1177/00380385134811282013
19. Standing G. Precariat: a New Dangerous Class. Moscow: Ad Marginem Press; 2014. 328 p. ISBN 978-5-91103-209-8 (In Russ.)
20. Toshchenko Zh.T. Precariat – a New Social Class. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya=Sociological Studies. 2015;(6):3-13. (In Russ.)
21. Wilson D., Keil R. The Real Creative Class. Social and Cultural Geography. 2008;9(8):841-847. https://doi.org/
10.1080/14649360802441473
22. Bourdieu P. Distinction: Social Criticism of Judgment. Ehkonomicheskaya sotsiologiya=Economic sociology. 2005;6(3):25-48.
(In Russ.)
23. Inozemtsev V.L. The Concept of Creativity in Modern Economic Theory. POLIS. Politicheskie issledovaniya=Polis. Political
Studies. 1992;(1-2):178-186. (In Russ.)
24. Grigorova Y.V. Transformation of Labor and New Forms of Exploitation of Creative Activity. Lichnost'. Kul'tura. Obshchestvo.
2012;14(3):204-208. (In Russ.)
25. Slobodskaia A.V. The precariat and the creative class: a comparative analysis of the social structure patterns of a post-industrial
society. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya=Tomsk State University Journal of
Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2018;(42):51-59. (In Russ.)
26. Boix-Domenech R., Soler-Marco V. Creative Service Industries and Regional Productivity. Papers in Regional Science. 2015;
96(2):261–279. https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12187
27. Stepanova T.D. Creative Class during the Coronavirus Crisis. Innovatsii i investitsii. 2021;(8):26-30. (In Russ.)
The article was submitted 16.03.2024; approved after reviewing 18.04.2024; accepted for publication 09.06.2024